Department of Agriculture

Tell us what to change or add.

Your name (optional)Your roleReview date

Continue a saved review

1. Check a decision

Open a decision below. Check the area, period, inputs, result and proposed next step.

2. Try the inputs

Use Example input to change a sample. Use Source input to check the fields and source details. The land-use change decision has its own comparison views.

Record your corrections below, then download your answers or print them.

3. Check each decision

1. Plan seed support around observed rice-category uptake 2. Target crop production costs requiring intervention 3. Prepare crop-stage irrigation recommendations 4. Adjust sowing guidance using observed planting progress 5. Compare varieties against local agronomic constraints 6. Choose what to handle first: locations with low comparable crop productivity 7. Choose what to handle first: field investigation of unusual pest incidence 8. Refer crop disease cases for diagnosis and control advice 9. Choose what to handle first: seed lots awaiting required tests 10. Plan seed procurement against seasonal demand 11. Refer soil-test-based nutrient requirements for review 12. Review proposed pesticide use against current conditions 13. Target extension services to unmet farmer needs 14. Select crop stages needing loss-reduction measures 15. Compare machinery service options for crop operations 16. Compare crop enterprises under resource constraints 17. Find crop enterprises with weak gross margins 18. Check yield change following documented weather events 19. Follow up farmers who received technical guidance 20. Select crop technologies for further validation

1. Plan seed support around observed rice-category uptakeDEC-DP03-001 · Seed adoption · Suggested priority: Medium

Try this decision

Plan seed support around observed rice-category uptake.

Validation required

Method. Plot share =100 × distinct eligible plots in category / eligible plots in all categories. Sown-area shares use a separate hectare denominator; grouped inputs do not verify plot identity.

Next step. Review evidence. Investigate material differences and redirect planning or field verification where justified.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Distinct eligible original plots [plots]; Sown area recorded separately [ha]

Other required evidence. Rice category; sown hectares; district; season; register coverage.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Bg 300 · Laggala Pallegama reporting frame

Input or result	Value	Unit
Distinct eligible original plots	107	plots
Sown area recorded separately	115	ha
Plot count	107	plots
Share of eligible plots	18.259	%
Share of recorded sown area	14.303	%

Categories must be mutually exclusive and cover the stated frame. Do not mix values, quantities, plots or hectares, or treat an HHI competition threshold as an institutional policy.

Proposed checking role. Crop specialist, extension officer and agricultural statistician.

After the action. Change in the approved composition indicator with coverage disclosed.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

Department of Agriculture publications and regulations — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Agro-climatology and climate change division — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
FAO crop evapotranspiration 56 — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

2. Target crop production costs requiring interventionDEC-DP03-002 · Production costs · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Target crop production costs requiring intervention.

Validation required

Method. Sum non-overlapping costs, then divide by the matching verified quantity for the same currency and accounting period.

Next step. Review evidence. Investigate cost drivers, compare suppliers/practices, or revise the budget proposal.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Labour cost [LKR]; Material/input cost [LKR]; Other non-overlapping cost [LKR]; Verified matching hectares [ha]

Other required evidence. Crop; season; fertilizer cost; labour cost; machinery cost; harvested hectares.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — production costs · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Labour cost	180,000	LKR
Material/input cost	255,000	LKR
Other non-overlapping cost	62,000	LKR
Verified matching hectares	5.4	ha
Cost per matching unit	92,037.037	LKR/ha
Total cost	497,000	LKR

An absent or zero denominator has no unit-cost result. Keep fixed, variable and opportunity costs identifiable.

Proposed checking role. Crop specialist, extension officer and agricultural statistician.

After the action. Actual comparable unit cost and service/output quality.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

Department of Agriculture publications and regulations — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Agro-climatology and climate change division — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
FAO crop evapotranspiration 56 — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

3. Prepare crop-stage irrigation recommendationsDEC-DP03-003 · Irrigation advice · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Prepare crop-stage irrigation recommendations.

Verified published component · Crop evapotranspiration ETc component

Method. ETc = ETo × Kc. Net = max(0, ETc + percolation + desired storage increase − rainfall after runoff − capillary contribution). Gross = net × hectares ×10 / application efficiency.

Next step. Review evidence. Propose crop demand, scheduling or allocation alternatives for authorized review.

Inputs, example and sources

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations · FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56 Crop Evapotranspiration
Institution publication · Chapter 5, Crop coefficient approach, equation 56

This verifies the ETc component only. Local water-balance allowances, coefficients and operating decisions still need confirmation.

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Irrigated crop area [ha]; Reference evapotranspiration [mm/day]; Crop coefficient [ratio]; Rainfall reaching the field after runoff [mm/day]; Deep percolation and paddy allowance [mm/day]; Capillary contribution [mm/day]; Desired change in stored soil water [mm/day]; Field application efficiency [fraction]

Other required evidence. Weather; reference evapotranspiration; crop coefficient; soil storage; effective rainfall; hectares.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — irrigation advice · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Irrigated crop area	85	ha
Reference evapotranspiration	4.5	mm/day
Crop coefficient	1.1	ratio
Rainfall reaching the field after runoff	1.6	mm/day
Deep percolation and paddy allowance	2	mm/day
Capillary contribution	0	mm/day
Desired change in stored soil water	0	mm/day
Field application efficiency	0.68	fraction
Gross daily irrigation requirement	6,687.5	m³/day
Net field requirement	5.35	mm/day

The full local balance, rooting depth, stress, crop stage and operating constraints still matter. The paddy allowance is explicit and must be zero where inapplicable. This is not an authorized reservoir release.

Proposed checking role. Crop specialist, extension officer and agricultural statistician.

After the action. Delivered water, crop stress, unmet demand and downstream conditions.

FAO 56: crop evapotranspiration — Institution publication. FAO 56 Chapter 5 equation 56; ETc = Kc × ETo. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
FAO56 root-zone water balance — Institution publication. Chapter8 equation85 and ETc = Kc ETo. Daily water balance components; local coefficients and operating assumptions still need review.
FAO Irrigation Water Management Training Manual 3 — Institution publication. Chapter 4.4 Irrigation water need of rice; steps 1 to 8. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

Department of Agriculture publications and regulations — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Agro-climatology and climate change division — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
FAO crop evapotranspiration 56 — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

4. Adjust sowing guidance using observed planting progressDEC-DP03-004 · Planting guidance · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Adjust sowing guidance using observed planting progress.

Validation required

Method. Observed date minus planned date in calendar days. Missing actual dates are pending, not zero delay. Approved working-day rules require a defined calendar.

Next step. Review evidence. Investigate a material deviation, assign correction, or propose a target revision.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Planned milestone/sowing date; Observed completion/sowing date

Other required evidence. Crop; intended sowing date; actual sowing date; forecast; season; hectares.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — planting guidance · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Planned milestone/sowing date	2025-06-01
Observed completion/sowing date	2025-06-09
Calendar date difference	8	days

Proposed checking role. Crop specialist, extension officer and agricultural statistician.

After the action. Subsequent variance with original and revised targets retained.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

Department of Agriculture publications and regulations — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Agro-climatology and climate change division — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
FAO crop evapotranspiration 56 — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

5. Compare varieties against local agronomic constraintsDEC-DP03-005 · Variety selection · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Compare varieties against local agronomic constraints.

Validation required

Method. Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.

Next step. Complete the evidence. Shortlist technically feasible alternatives, reject exclusions, or request site evidence.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Variety traits; Variety traits evidence reference; soil; soil evidence reference; rainfall; rainfall evidence reference; temperature; temperature evidence reference; pest pressure; pest pressure evidence reference; water availability; water availability evidence reference

Other required evidence. Variety traits; soil; rainfall; temperature; pest pressure; water availability.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — variety selection · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Variety traits	Missing
Variety traits evidence reference
soil	Documented
soil evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
rainfall	Documented
rainfall evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
temperature	Documented
temperature evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
pest pressure	Documented
pest pressure evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
water availability	Documented
water availability evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
Evidence gaps	1	items

Evidence completeness alone cannot establish suitability, eligibility, safety, permission or method validity.

Proposed checking role. Crop specialist, extension officer and agricultural statistician.

After the action. Field-verified limiting factors and observed performance.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

Department of Agriculture publications and regulations — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Agro-climatology and climate change division — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
FAO crop evapotranspiration 56 — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

6. Choose what to handle first: locations with low comparable crop productivityDEC-DP03-006 · Yield gaps · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Prioritize locations with low comparable crop productivity.

Validation required

Method. Harvested crop output / Matching harvested crop area, for the same product, process and period.

Next step. Review evidence. Investigate low productivity, compare practices, or improve the input/output measurements.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Harvested crop output [kg]; Matching harvested crop area [ha]

Other required evidence. Crop variety; harvest kg; harvested hectares; management system; season.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — yield gaps · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Harvested crop output	19,780	kg
Matching harvested crop area	5.4	ha
Crop yield	3,662.963	kg/ha

Published district paddy yields

Government publication — Department of Census and Statistics Sri Lanka. Average yield per net hectare all irrigation schemes (kg/net ha).

District	2024 Yala	2025 Yala
Kandy	2,859	3,761
Matale	4,500	4,302
Nuwara Eliya	3,905	3,941

District estimates provide context. They are not Knuckles project or divisional results. Net harvested hectares differ from gross harvested or sown hectares. Do not reconstruct the published yield by dividing rounded production and area totals. Seasonal differences do not establish a cause or intervention need.

DCS 2024 Yala · DCS 2025 Yala

Proposed checking role. Crop specialist, extension officer and agricultural statistician.

After the action. Output per relevant input alongside quality and resource impacts.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

Department of Agriculture publications and regulations — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Agro-climatology and climate change division — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
FAO crop evapotranspiration 56 — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

7. Choose what to handle first: field investigation of unusual pest incidenceDEC-DP03-007 · Pest surveillance · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Prioritize field investigation of unusual pest incidence.

Validation required

Method. Later/comparison value minus Comparable reference value. Relative change = 100 × difference / Comparable reference value when the earlier value is positive.

Next step. Review evidence. Verify the observation, refer a confirmed exception, or retain it with explanation.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Comparable reference value [pests per inspected plant]; Later/comparison value [pests per inspected plant]

Other required evidence. Field ID; crop stage; pest counts; survey effort; baseline incidence; date.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — pest surveillance · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Comparable reference value	100	pests per inspected plant
Later/comparison value	90	pests per inspected plant
Difference	-10	pests per inspected plant
Relative change	-10	%

Proposed checking role. Crop specialist, extension officer and agricultural statistician.

After the action. Validated exceptions, response time and resulting outcome.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

Department of Agriculture publications and regulations — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Agro-climatology and climate change division — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
FAO crop evapotranspiration 56 — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

8. Refer crop disease cases for diagnosis and control adviceDEC-DP03-008 · Disease management · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Refer crop disease cases for diagnosis and control advice.

Validation required

Method. Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.

Next step. Complete the evidence. Request correction, refer mandatory failures, or accept the inspected item with conditions.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Symptoms; Symptoms evidence reference; laboratory result; laboratory result evidence reference; crop; crop evidence reference; spread observations; spread observations evidence reference; current control guidance; current control guidance evidence reference

Other required evidence. Symptoms; laboratory result; crop; spread observations; current control guidance.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — disease management · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Symptoms	Missing
Symptoms evidence reference
laboratory result	Documented
laboratory result evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
crop	Documented
crop evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
spread observations	Documented
spread observations evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
current control guidance	Documented
current control guidance evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
Evidence gaps	1	items

Evidence completeness alone cannot establish suitability, eligibility, safety, permission or method validity.

Proposed checking role. Crop specialist, extension officer and agricultural statistician.

After the action. Evidence-backed corrective closure and recurring nonconformances.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

Department of Agriculture publications and regulations — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Agro-climatology and climate change division — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
FAO crop evapotranspiration 56 — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

9. Choose what to handle first: seed lots awaiting required testsDEC-DP03-009 · Seed certification · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Prioritize seed lots awaiting required tests.

Validation required

Method. Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.

Next step. Complete the evidence. Request correction, refer mandatory failures, or accept the inspected item with conditions.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Lot ID; Lot ID evidence reference; germination test; germination test evidence reference; purity test; purity test evidence reference; health test; health test evidence reference; current certification criteria; current certification criteria evidence reference

Other required evidence. Lot ID; germination test; purity test; health test; current certification criteria.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — seed certification · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Lot ID	Missing
Lot ID evidence reference
germination test	Documented
germination test evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
purity test	Documented
purity test evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
health test	Documented
health test evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
current certification criteria	Documented
current certification criteria evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
Evidence gaps	1	items

Evidence completeness alone cannot establish suitability, eligibility, safety, permission or method validity.

Proposed checking role. Crop specialist, extension officer and agricultural statistician.

After the action. Evidence-backed corrective closure and recurring nonconformances.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

Department of Agriculture publications and regulations — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Agro-climatology and climate change division — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
FAO crop evapotranspiration 56 — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

10. Plan seed procurement against seasonal demandDEC-DP03-010 · Seed supply · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Plan seed procurement against seasonal demand.

Validation required

Method. Usable = physical−quarantined−expired (non-overlapping groups). Available = usable−commitments. Additional gap = max(0, new demand−available).

Next step. Review replenishment gap. Reorder approved quantities, redistribute stock, or quarantine affected lots.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Physical stock [kg seed]; Quarantined stock [kg seed]; Expired stock [kg seed]; Committed usable stock [kg seed]; Additional demand [kg seed]; Supplier lead time [days]; Remaining shelf life of usable stock [days]

Other required evidence. Variety; valid stock kg; commitments kg; seed demand kg; lead time; expiry.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — seed supply · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Physical stock	1,200	kg seed
Quarantined stock	100	kg seed
Expired stock	50	kg seed
Committed usable stock	740	kg seed
Additional demand	500	kg seed
Supplier lead time	14	days
Remaining shelf life of usable stock	30	days
Uncommitted usable stock	310	kg seed
Additional demand gap	190	kg seed

Stock must be compatible by item, lot, condition, expiry and delivery window. Do not allocate quarantined/expired stock or silently erase overcommitment.

Proposed checking role. Crop specialist, extension officer and agricultural statistician.

After the action. Stockouts, expiry, losses and verified lot traceability.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

Department of Agriculture publications and regulations — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Agro-climatology and climate change division — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
FAO crop evapotranspiration 56 — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

11. Refer soil-test-based nutrient requirements for reviewDEC-DP03-011 · Fertilizer advice · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Refer soil-test-based nutrient requirements for review.

Validation required

Method. Compare the measured value only with matching parameter, unit, use and averaging period. Retain limit source/version and censored-result status.

Next step. Outside example comparison bounds. Refer a confirmed nonconformance for authorized response, resample, or investigate the method.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Parameter and applicable use; Measured result [mg/kg]; Example lower comparison bound [mg/kg]; Example upper comparison bound [mg/kg]; Original and limit unit; Sampling and analytical method/version; Limit source, version and use; Parameter, unit, use and averaging period match; Result is below a reporting/detection limit; Averaging interval, sampling depth or process basis

Other required evidence. Soil test; crop yield target; previous application; nutrient availability; approved recommendation.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — fertilizer advice · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Parameter and applicable use	Available phosphorus by stated method
Measured result	12	mg/kg
Example lower comparison bound	15	mg/kg
Example upper comparison bound	30	mg/kg
Original and limit unit	mg/kg
Sampling and analytical method/version	Sample laboratory method
Limit source, version and use	Fictional comparison bounds; not a regulatory limit
Parameter, unit, use and averaging period match	Yes
Result is below a reporting/detection limit	No
Averaging interval, sampling depth or process basis	Sample stated sampling/averaging basis
Measured value	12	mg/kg

Example bounds establish no compliance or diagnosis. Ambient, drinking-water, effluent, crop, food, air and noise standards are not interchangeable. A censored result is not an exact zero.

Proposed checking role. Crop specialist, extension officer and agricultural statistician.

After the action. Follow-up compliance, exposure/service condition and corrective closure.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

Department of Agriculture publications and regulations — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Agro-climatology and climate change division — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
FAO crop evapotranspiration 56 — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

12. Review proposed pesticide use against current conditionsDEC-DP03-012 · Pesticide stewardship · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Review proposed pesticide use against current conditions.

Validation required

Method. Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.

Next step. Complete the evidence. Submit a recommendation to the appointed authority, request evidence, or record an appeal.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Product registration; Product registration evidence reference; crop; crop evidence reference; pest; pest evidence reference; label version; label version evidence reference; application record; application record evidence reference; restrictions; restrictions evidence reference

Other required evidence. Product registration; crop; pest; label version; application record; restrictions.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — pesticide stewardship · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Product registration	Missing
Product registration evidence reference
crop	Documented
crop evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
pest	Documented
pest evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
label version	Documented
label version evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
application record	Documented
application record evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
restrictions	Documented
restrictions evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
Evidence gaps	1	items

Evidence completeness alone cannot establish suitability, eligibility, safety, permission or method validity.

Proposed checking role. Crop specialist, extension officer and agricultural statistician.

After the action. Documented determinations, processing time and appeal outcomes.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

Sri Lanka Registrar of Pesticides — Government publication. Current registration lists, restrictions and label guidance. Registration and label evidence; no treatment recommendation or automatic permission.
Department of Agriculture publications and regulations — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Agro-climatology and climate change division — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
FAO crop evapotranspiration 56 — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

13. Target extension services to unmet farmer needsDEC-DP03-013 · Extension delivery · Suggested priority: Medium

Try this decision

Target extension services to unmet farmer needs.

Validation required

Method. 100 × distinct covered eligible units / eligible frame. Known uncovered = frame − covered − unknown.

Next step. Review evidence. Select eligible underserved units for outreach, investigate missing coverage, or revise the verified frame.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Required eligible frame [farmers]; Distinct members of that frame covered [farmers]; Frame members with unknown coverage [farmers]

Other required evidence. Farmer ID; assessed need; extension attendance; practice adoption; service area.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — extension delivery · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Required eligible frame	100	farmers
Distinct members of that frame covered	65	farmers
Frame members with unknown coverage	5	farmers
Verified coverage	65	%
Known uncovered	30	farmers
Unknown coverage	5	farmers

Count each eligible unit once for the selected service and period. Received messages, attendance, adoption and outcomes are separate measures.

Proposed checking role. Crop specialist, extension officer and agricultural statistician.

After the action. Verified eligible units receiving service and remaining unmet need.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

Department of Agriculture publications and regulations — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Agro-climatology and climate change division — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
FAO crop evapotranspiration 56 — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

14. Select crop stages needing loss-reduction measuresDEC-DP03-014 · Post-harvest loss · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Select crop stages needing loss-reduction measures.

Validation required

Method. Unaccounted = input − saleable output − usable by-products − closing stock − transfers out. Share =100 × unaccounted / input.

Next step. Review evidence. Target the loss stage, compare prevention options, or improve missing measurement.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Batch input on stated moisture basis [kg]; Saleable output [kg]; Usable by-product [kg]; Closing stock [kg]; Documented transfers out [kg]

Other required evidence. Batch input kg; saleable output kg; moisture; transfers; rejected quantity; stage.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — post-harvest loss · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Batch input on stated moisture basis	1,200	kg
Saleable output	970	kg
Usable by-product	85	kg
Closing stock	45	kg
Documented transfers out	20	kg
Unaccounted physical share	6.667	%
Unaccounted mass	80	kg

Use a consistent moisture basis and process boundary. Unaccounted mass is not automatically avoidable food loss or spoilage.

Proposed checking role. Crop specialist, extension officer and agricultural statistician.

After the action. Verified physical loss and quality loss on comparable batches.

FAO food loss measurement — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

Department of Agriculture publications and regulations — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Agro-climatology and climate change division — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
FAO crop evapotranspiration 56 — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

15. Compare machinery service options for crop operationsDEC-DP03-015 · Mechanization · Suggested priority: Medium

Try this decision

Compare machinery service options for crop operations.

Validation required

Method. Budget minus option cost. Compare benefits, adverse effects and mandatory constraints separately; no weighted score or automatic best option.

Next step. Compare feasible trade-offs. Choose a feasible alternative with rationale and conditions, commission evidence, or defer.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Option cost [LKR]; Available budget [LKR]; Mandatory constraints; Expected benefit and its evidence; Resource needs and adverse effects

Other required evidence. Operation hours; cultivated hectares; hire cost; labour availability; access constraints.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Targeted extension visits · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Option cost	1,500,000	LKR
Available budget	1,800,000	LKR
Mandatory constraints	Met
Expected benefit and its evidence	Compare machinery service options for crop operations; Operation hours and cultivated hectares evidence needed
Resource needs and adverse effects	Sample water, labour, access and safeguard trade-offs
Budget remaining after option	300,000	LKR

Affordability does not prove feasibility or scientific suitability. A missing mandatory condition keeps an option unresolved.

Proposed checking role. Crop specialist, extension officer and agricultural statistician.

After the action. Verified benefits, costs and adverse effects versus the agreed baseline.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

Department of Agriculture publications and regulations — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Agro-climatology and climate change division — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
FAO crop evapotranspiration 56 — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

16. Compare crop enterprises under resource constraintsDEC-DP03-016 · Crop diversification · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Compare crop enterprises under resource constraints.

Validation required

Method. Budget minus option cost. Compare benefits, adverse effects and mandatory constraints separately; no weighted score or automatic best option.

Next step. Compare feasible trade-offs. Choose a feasible alternative with rationale and conditions, commission evidence, or defer.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Option cost [LKR]; Available budget [LKR]; Mandatory constraints; Expected benefit and its evidence; Resource needs and adverse effects

Other required evidence. Crop alternatives; gross margins; water need; labour days; market access; risk.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Targeted extension visits · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Option cost	1,500,000	LKR
Available budget	1,800,000	LKR
Mandatory constraints	Met
Expected benefit and its evidence	Compare crop enterprises under resource constraints; Crop alternatives and gross margins evidence needed
Resource needs and adverse effects	Sample water, labour, access and safeguard trade-offs
Budget remaining after option	300,000	LKR

Affordability does not prove feasibility or scientific suitability. A missing mandatory condition keeps an option unresolved.

Proposed checking role. Crop specialist, extension officer and agricultural statistician.

After the action. Verified benefits, costs and adverse effects versus the agreed baseline.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

Department of Agriculture publications and regulations — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Agro-climatology and climate change division — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
FAO crop evapotranspiration 56 — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

17. Find crop enterprises with weak gross marginsDEC-DP03-017 · Farm income · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Identify crop enterprises with weak gross margins.

Verified published formula · Enterprise gross margin

Method. Gross margin = saleable output × realized price − variable costs. Divide by matching hectares for margin/ha; variable-cost break-even price = variable costs / output.

Next step. Review evidence. Choose a feasible enterprise option, adjust variable inputs, or review price and yield risk.

Inputs, example and sources

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations · Farm Management for Asia A Systems Approach
Institution publication · Chapter 4, Gross margin and section 4.7.1

Per-hectare and variable-cost break-even outputs are algebraic rearrangements. Local costs, prices and interpretation still need confirmation.

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Saleable output [kg]; Realized price [LKR/kg]; Variable costs [LKR]; Matching crop area [ha]

Other required evidence. Saleable crop kg; realized price LKR per kg; variable costs LKR; hectares.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — farm income · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Saleable output	3,800	kg
Realized price	112	LKR/kg
Variable costs	295,000	LKR
Matching crop area	1	ha
Enterprise gross margin	130,600	LKR
Gross margin per hectare	130,600	LKR/ha
Variable-cost break-even price	77.632	LKR/kg

Keep fixed costs, family-labour opportunity cost, taxes and financing identifiable. Gross margin is not net profit.

Proposed checking role. Crop specialist, extension officer and agricultural statistician.

After the action. Realized gross margin and downside outcomes on the same basis.

FAO enterprise and activity budgeting — Institution publication. Section4 enterprise and activity budgeting. Published enterprise gross margin/revenue and variable-cost distinction.
SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

Department of Agriculture publications and regulations — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Agro-climatology and climate change division — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
FAO crop evapotranspiration 56 — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

18. Check yield change following documented weather eventsDEC-DP03-018 · Weather losses · Suggested priority: Medium

Try this decision

Assess yield change following documented weather events.

Verified published formula · Difference-in-differences arithmetic

Method. (Treatment after−before) − (comparison after−before), using the same outcome definition and periods.

Next step. Supply study-design evidence. Continue, adapt, expand or stop a programme based on defensible outcome evidence.

Inputs, example and sources

World Bank · Impact Evaluation in Practice Second Edition
Institution publication · Chapter 7, table 7.2, printed page 140, PDF page 170

The formula is verified. Causal interpretation still requires a defensible study design, comparison and assumptions.

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Treatment Crop productivity before [kg/ha]; Treatment Crop productivity after [kg/ha]; Comparison Crop productivity before [kg/ha]; Comparison Crop productivity after [kg/ha]; Study design and comparability evidence; Outcome definition, method and reference basis

Other required evidence. Field yields; exposure dates; baseline yields; comparable unexposed plots; management.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — weather losses · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Treatment Crop productivity before	42	kg/ha
Treatment Crop productivity after	59	kg/ha
Comparison Crop productivity before	39	kg/ha
Comparison Crop productivity after	46	kg/ha
Study design and comparability evidence	Missing
Outcome definition, method and reference basis	Crop productivity /example matching definition1
Difference in changes	10	kg/ha

The arithmetic alone does not establish causation. Design, parallel trends, confounding, attrition, uncertainty and adverse effects need appropriate evidence.

Proposed checking role. Crop specialist, extension officer and agricultural statistician.

After the action. Verified outcomes, costs, distributional effects and evidence strength.

World Bank Impact Evaluation in Practice Second Edition — Institution publication. Chapter7 difference-in-differences. Published difference-in-differences estimator and study assumptions; aggregate examples do not establish causation.
SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

Department of Agriculture publications and regulations — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Agro-climatology and climate change division — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
FAO crop evapotranspiration 56 — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

19. Follow up farmers who received technical guidanceDEC-DP03-019 · Advisory effectiveness · Suggested priority: Lower

Try this decision

Follow up farmers who received technical guidance.

Validation required

Method. 100 × verified completed members / original unique cohort. Keep unknown follow-up separate; stages are nested, not independent populations.

Next step. Review evidence. Address stage bottlenecks, follow up dropouts, or revise service delivery.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Unique original cohort entrants [cases]; Entrants reviewed [cases]; Entrants with verified completion [cases]; Entrants with unknown follow-up [cases]

Other required evidence. Advisory cohort; delivery date; acknowledged receipt; verified practice uptake; follow-up date.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — advisory effectiveness · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Unique original cohort entrants	180	cases
Entrants reviewed	132	cases
Entrants with verified completion	96	cases
Entrants with unknown follow-up	12	cases
Verified completion share	53.333	%
Not verified complete	84	cases

Attendance, receipt, adoption, delivered service and outcomes are distinct stages. Repeated visits must not become new people.

Proposed checking role. Crop specialist, extension officer and agricultural statistician.

After the action. Verified progression, waiting times and outcomes for the same cohort.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

Department of Agriculture publications and regulations — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Agro-climatology and climate change division — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
FAO crop evapotranspiration 56 — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

20. Select crop technologies for further validationDEC-DP03-020 · Research trials · Suggested priority: Medium

Try this decision

Select crop technologies for further validation.

Validation required

Method. Reproduced minus expected result, within an explicitly supplied absolute tolerance, using the same exact input/method versions and a separate checker. Retain originals, code, parameters and environment evidence.

Next step. Investigate reproduction difference. Accept reproducible evidence for review, investigate differences, or withhold an unsupported result.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Earlier/source value [kg/ha]; Independently reproduced value [kg/ha]; Original measurement unit; Comparison measurement unit; Compared measure and definition; Documented absolute comparison tolerance [kg/ha]; Expected input/method version; Reproduced input/method version; Original result creator; Independent reproducer

Other required evidence. Trial protocol; treatment outputs; controls; costs; uncertainty; location applicability.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — research trials · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Earlier/source value	100	kg/ha
Independently reproduced value	90	kg/ha
Original measurement unit	Sample matching unit
Comparison measurement unit	Sample matching unit
Compared measure and definition	Sample comparable kg/ha measure; same input scope
Documented absolute comparison tolerance	0.01	kg/ha
Expected input/method version	Sample input1 /method1
Reproduced input/method version	Sample input1 /method1
Original result creator	Preparation officer
Independent reproducer	Independent checking officer
Difference	-10	kg/ha
Relative change	-10	%

Proposed checking role. Crop specialist, extension officer and agricultural statistician.

After the action. Independent reproduction within the approved tolerance.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

Department of Agriculture publications and regulations — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Agro-climatology and climate change division — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
FAO crop evapotranspiration 56 — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

4. Existing data forms for your institution

Check which existing source fields can supply the decision inputs.

Irrigation Offices · Land Suitability

Existing form reference: b5701ed646f0f063

Field	Unit	Required
name	Confirm if needed	No
category	Confirm if needed	No
district_n	Confirm if needed	No

AgroEcological Zones Point · Land Suitability

Existing form reference: cc316b77dd9398f9

Field	Unit	Required
fid_1	Confirm if needed	No
left	Confirm if needed	No
bottom	Confirm if needed	No
right	Confirm if needed	No
top	Confirm if needed	No
x	Confirm if needed	No
y	Confirm if needed	No
fid_2	Confirm if needed	No
join_count	Confirm if needed	No
target_fid	Confirm if needed	No
id	Confirm if needed	No
gridcode	Confirm if needed	No
final_id	Confirm if needed	No
zone	Confirm if needed	No
climatic_z	Confirm if needed	No
agro_eco_z	Confirm if needed	No
agro_eco_r	Confirm if needed	No
terrain	Confirm if needed	No
major_soil	Confirm if needed	No
land_use	Confirm if needed	No
anualrfmm	Confirm if needed	No

ASC Locations · Land Suitability

Existing form reference: a64b0a6754afd4ed

Field	Unit	Required
ASC Number	Confirm if needed	No
ASC Name	Confirm if needed	No
XCOORD	Confirm if needed	No
YCOORD	Confirm if needed	No
Location Code	Confirm if needed	No
Description	Confirm if needed	No

Agro Ecological Zones · Land Suitability

Existing form reference: 592c3b578787edcd

Field	Unit	Required
Zone	Confirm if needed	No
Climatic_Zone	Confirm if needed	No
Agro_Eco_Zone	Confirm if needed	No
Agro_Eco_R	Confirm if needed	No
Final_ID	Confirm if needed	No
Terrain	Confirm if needed	No
Major_Soil	Confirm if needed	No
Land_Use	Confirm if needed	No
AnualRFmm	Confirm if needed	No
st_area(shape)	Confirm if needed	No
st_length(shape)	Confirm if needed	No

Irrigation Schemes · Land Suitability

Existing form reference: 648a6f28a711dfa9

Field	Unit	Required
System Name	Confirm if needed	No
Systems	Confirm if needed	No
ID	Confirm if needed	No
ID_Systems	Confirm if needed	No
MASL_System	Confirm if needed	No
DSD_Name	Confirm if needed	No
Description	Confirm if needed	No
st_area(shape)	Confirm if needed	No
st_length(shape)	Confirm if needed	No

Irrigation Lands · Land Suitability

Existing form reference: e877698582fc591c

Field	Unit	Required
Landuse Type	Confirm if needed	No
Landuse Classification (CropType)	Confirm if needed	No
Creation Method	Confirm if needed	No
Year of Creation	Confirm if needed	No
Revision Method	Confirm if needed	No
Year of Revision	Confirm if needed	No
GFCODE	Confirm if needed	No
Description	Confirm if needed	No
st_area(shape)	Confirm if needed	No
st_length(shape)	Confirm if needed	No

Crops Suitability · Land Suitability

Existing form reference: 54fb1fe96af4f04c

Field	Unit	Required
Province Name	Confirm if needed	No
Province Code	Confirm if needed	No
District Name	Confirm if needed	No
District Code	Confirm if needed	No
DS Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
DS Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
GND Name	Confirm if needed	No
GND Number	Confirm if needed	No
MC UC PS Name	Confirm if needed	No
MC UC PS Code	Confirm if needed	No
Polling Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
Polling Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
id	Confirm if needed	No
Area Hectare	Confirm if needed	No
ASC Name	Confirm if needed	No
Area Sq Km	Confirm if needed	No
Square Km	Confirm if needed	No
Crop Type	Confirm if needed	No
st_area(shape)	Confirm if needed	No
st_length(shape)	Confirm if needed	No

Provinces · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: 34b688f04ba12422

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
name	Confirm if needed	No
code	Confirm if needed	No

Districts · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: f25025b360be4121

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
name	Confirm if needed	No
code	Confirm if needed	No
province DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
province DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
province DTO / code	Confirm if needed	No

Ds divisions · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: b89e70ac83fb5930

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
code	Confirm if needed	No
name	Confirm if needed	No
district DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
district DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
district DTO / code	Confirm if needed	No
created Date	Confirm if needed	No
modified Date	Confirm if needed	No

Gn divisions · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: 8f42b4909736031c

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
name	Confirm if needed	No
code	Confirm if needed	No
created Date	Confirm if needed	No
modified Date	Confirm if needed	No
land Area	Confirm if needed	No
agricultural Land Area	Confirm if needed	No
non Agricultural Land Area	Confirm if needed	No
crop Area	Confirm if needed	No
agro Ecological Zone DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
agro Ecological Zone DTO / ae Zone Id	Confirm if needed	No
agro Ecological Zone DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
agro Ecological Zone DTO / average Rainfall	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / region Id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / asc Region Id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / province Segment Id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / provincial Dd Id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / pro Director Level DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / pro Director Level DTO / pro Director Id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / pro Director Level DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / pro Director Level DTO / city	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / pro Director Level DTO / latitude	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / pro Director Level DTO / longitude	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / city	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / latitude	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / longitude	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / city	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / latitude	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / longitude	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / code	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / district DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / district DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / district DTO / code	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / district DTO / province DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / district DTO / province DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / district DTO / province DTO / code	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / arpa Id	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / id	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / asc Id	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / name	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / district Commissioner Level DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / district Commissioner Level DTO / district Comm Id	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / district Commissioner Level DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / district Commissioner Level DTO / do Agrarian Development DTO	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / district Commissioner Level DTO / created Date	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / district Commissioner Level DTO / modified Date	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / district Commissioner Level DTO / city	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / district Commissioner Level DTO / latitude	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / district Commissioner Level DTO / longitude	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / created Date	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / modified Date	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / city	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / latitude	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / longitude	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / created Date	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / modified Date	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / city	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / latitude	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / longitude	Confirm if needed	No
gn Division Type	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / inter Provincial Ada Segment DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / inter Provincial Ada Segment DTO / segment Id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / inter Provincial Ada Segment DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / inter Provincial Ada Segment DTO / inter Province Deputy Director Level DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / inter Provincial Ada Segment DTO / inter Province Deputy Director Level DTO / dd Id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / inter Provincial Ada Segment DTO / inter Province Deputy Director Level DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / inter Provincial Ada Segment DTO / inter Province Deputy Director Level DTO / director Doa DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / inter Provincial Ada Segment DTO / inter Province Deputy Director Level DTO / director Doa DTO / doa Id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / inter Provincial Ada Segment DTO / inter Province Deputy Director Level DTO / director Doa DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Unit DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Unit DTO / unit Id	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Unit DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / district DTO / province DTO / created Date	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / district DTO / province DTO / modified Date	Confirm if needed	No
scs Sub Region Id	Confirm if needed	No
scs Sub Region Dto / id	Confirm if needed	No
scs Sub Region Dto / code	Confirm if needed	No
scs Sub Region Dto / description	Confirm if needed	No
scs Sub Region Dto / scs Region	Confirm if needed	No

Provincial director divisions · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: 2337b92f31770ba9

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
pro Director Id	Confirm if needed	No
description	Confirm if needed	No
city	Confirm if needed	No
latitude	Confirm if needed	No
longitude	Confirm if needed	No

Provincial deputy director level · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: ca12c4d677b5003c

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
provincial Dd Id	Confirm if needed	No
description	Confirm if needed	No
pro Director Level DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
pro Director Level DTO / pro Director Id	Confirm if needed	No
pro Director Level DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
pro Director Level DTO / city	Confirm if needed	No
pro Director Level DTO / latitude	Confirm if needed	No
pro Director Level DTO / longitude	Confirm if needed	No
city	Confirm if needed	No
latitude	Confirm if needed	No
longitude	Confirm if needed	No

Provincial ada segments · Crop Production

Existing form reference: 2060369005c105d9

Field	Unit	Required

Doa divisions · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: eb2b3109790a85b0

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
doa Id	Confirm if needed	No
description	Confirm if needed	No

Inter-provincial ada divisions · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: 3c4b7ca01eae2c96

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
segment Id	Confirm if needed	No
description	Confirm if needed	No
inter Province Deputy Director Level DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
inter Province Deputy Director Level DTO / dd Id	Confirm if needed	No
inter Province Deputy Director Level DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No

Mahaweli authorities · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: a928ea0c164539db

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
authority Id	Confirm if needed	No
description	Confirm if needed	No
city	Confirm if needed	No
latitude	Confirm if needed	No
longitude	Confirm if needed	No

Mahaweli systems · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: 8e71c080613ac3a4

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
system Id	Confirm if needed	No
description	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Authority DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Authority DTO / authority Id	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Authority DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Authority DTO / city	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Authority DTO / latitude	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Authority DTO / longitude	Confirm if needed	No
city	Confirm if needed	No
latitude	Confirm if needed	No
longitude	Confirm if needed	No

Mahaweli blocks · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: 1b6608ff1b096b55

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
code	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli System DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli System DTO / system Id	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli System DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli System DTO / mahaweli Authority DTO	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli System DTO / city	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli System DTO / latitude	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli System DTO / longitude	Confirm if needed	No
description	Confirm if needed	No
land Area	Confirm if needed	No
cultivated Area	Confirm if needed	No
irrigated Area	Confirm if needed	No
non Irrigated Area	Confirm if needed	No
created Date	Confirm if needed	No
modified Date	Confirm if needed	No
district DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
district DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
district DTO / code	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / code	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / created Date	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / modified Date	Confirm if needed	No

Mahaweli units · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: b2dbe12695570d5c

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
unit Id	Confirm if needed	No
description	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Block DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Block DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Block DTO / land Area	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Block DTO / cultivated Area	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Block DTO / irrigated Area	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Block DTO / non Irrigated Area	Confirm if needed	No

Agrarian development divisions · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: fc991a6c3bc249f6

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
do Agrarian Development Id	Confirm if needed	No
name	Confirm if needed	No
created Date	Confirm if needed	No
modified Date	Confirm if needed	No
city	Confirm if needed	No
latitude	Confirm if needed	No
longitude	Confirm if needed	No

District commissioner divisions · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: 57c890c642eab82c

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
district Comm Id	Confirm if needed	No
name	Confirm if needed	No
do Agrarian Development DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
do Agrarian Development DTO / do Agrarian Development Id	Confirm if needed	No
do Agrarian Development DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
do Agrarian Development DTO / created Date	Confirm if needed	No
do Agrarian Development DTO / modified Date	Confirm if needed	No
do Agrarian Development DTO / city	Confirm if needed	No
do Agrarian Development DTO / latitude	Confirm if needed	No
do Agrarian Development DTO / longitude	Confirm if needed	No
created Date	Confirm if needed	No
modified Date	Confirm if needed	No
city	Confirm if needed	No
latitude	Confirm if needed	No
longitude	Confirm if needed	No

Asc divisions · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: 0bb5ed17e5cdc863

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
asc Id	Confirm if needed	No
name	Confirm if needed	No
district Commissioner Level DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
district Commissioner Level DTO / district Comm Id	Confirm if needed	No
district Commissioner Level DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
district Commissioner Level DTO / do Agrarian Development DTO	Confirm if needed	No
district Commissioner Level DTO / created Date	Confirm if needed	No
district Commissioner Level DTO / modified Date	Confirm if needed	No
district Commissioner Level DTO / city	Confirm if needed	No
district Commissioner Level DTO / latitude	Confirm if needed	No
district Commissioner Level DTO / longitude	Confirm if needed	No
created Date	Confirm if needed	No
modified Date	Confirm if needed	No
city	Confirm if needed	No
latitude	Confirm if needed	No
longitude	Confirm if needed	No

Crop categories · Crop Production

Existing form reference: 816a25e50e472c74

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
category Id	Confirm if needed	No
description	Confirm if needed	No

Crop sub categories · Crop Production

Existing form reference: 9ec496a5e0c6aadf

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
description	Confirm if needed	No
sub Category Id	Confirm if needed	No
crop Category DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
crop Category DTO / category Id	Confirm if needed	No
crop Category DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No

Crops · Crop Production

Existing form reference: f6a51a2d7e2080bc

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
crop Id	Confirm if needed	No
description	Confirm if needed	No
crop Type	Confirm if needed	No
scientific Name	Confirm if needed	No
optimum Temperature	Confirm if needed	No
nursery Establishment Period	Confirm if needed	No
harvesting	Confirm if needed	No
family	Confirm if needed	No
is Multi Pick	Confirm if needed	No
micro Green Available	Confirm if needed	No
crop Sub Category DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
crop Sub Category DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
crop Sub Category DTO / sub Category Id	Confirm if needed	No
crop Sub Category DTO / crop Category DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
crop Sub Category DTO / crop Category DTO / category Id	Confirm if needed	No
crop Sub Category DTO / crop Category DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
soil Type DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
soil Type DTO / soil Type Code	Confirm if needed	No
soil Type DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
soil Type DTO / created Date	Confirm if needed	No
soil Type DTO / modified Date	Confirm if needed	No
is Plantation Crop	Confirm if needed	No
annual Rainfall	Confirm if needed	No
altitude	Confirm if needed	No
suitable Cultivation Areas	Confirm if needed	No
soil Characteristics	Confirm if needed	No
soil Ph Range	Confirm if needed	No
nursery Management	Confirm if needed	No
land Preparation	Confirm if needed	No
seeding Transplanting Planting	Confirm if needed	No
planting Time	Confirm if needed	No
seed Or Cutting Requirement	Confirm if needed	No
spacing	Confirm if needed	No

Crop varieties · Crop Production

Existing form reference: 4407b75d4bb7f035

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
variety Id	Confirm if needed	No
variety Name	Confirm if needed	No
variety Description	Confirm if needed	No
pericarp Color / id	Confirm if needed	No
pericarp Color / code	Confirm if needed	No
pericarp Color / description	Confirm if needed	No
grain Size	Confirm if needed	No
average Yield	Confirm if needed	No
maturity Time	Confirm if needed	No
is Imported	Confirm if needed	No
is Multi Pick	Confirm if needed	No
grain Color	Confirm if needed	No
bearing Period In Days	Confirm if needed	No
scientific Name	Confirm if needed	No
released Year	Confirm if needed	No
duration Between Two Picks	Confirm if needed	No
edible Part Shape	Confirm if needed	No
seed Requirement	Confirm if needed	No
spacing	Confirm if needed	No
soil Problems	Confirm if needed	No
number Of Pics	Confirm if needed	No
farmer Yield	Confirm if needed	No
research Yield	Confirm if needed	No
grain Quality	Confirm if needed	No
croplook Variety Id	Confirm if needed	No
variety Type	Confirm if needed	No
pollination Type	Confirm if needed	No
grain Type / id	Confirm if needed	No
grain Type / code	Confirm if needed	No
grain Type / description	Confirm if needed	No
age Type	Confirm if needed	No
crop DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
crop DTO / crop Id	Confirm if needed	No
crop DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
crop DTO / scientific Name	Confirm if needed	No
crop DTO / is Multi Pick	Confirm if needed	No
crop DTO / crop Sub Category DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
crop DTO / crop Sub Category DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
crop DTO / crop Sub Category DTO / sub Category Id	Confirm if needed	No
crop DTO / crop Sub Category DTO / crop Category DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
crop DTO / crop Sub Category DTO / crop Category DTO / category Id	Confirm if needed	No
crop DTO / crop Sub Category DTO / crop Category DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
harti Items DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
harti Items DTO / item Num	Confirm if needed	No
harti Items DTO / item Name	Confirm if needed	No
harti Items DTO / group Name	Confirm if needed	No
file Resource DTOList	Confirm if needed	No
discontinued	Confirm if needed	No
discontinued Date	Confirm if needed	No
research Yield Dry Weight	Confirm if needed	No
average Yield Dry Weight	Confirm if needed	No
paddy Variety Type	Confirm if needed	No
grain Category / id	Confirm if needed	No
grain Category / code	Confirm if needed	No
grain Category / description	Confirm if needed	No
farmer Selection	Confirm if needed	No
plant Growth	Confirm if needed	No
age Group / id	Confirm if needed	No
age Group / code	Confirm if needed	No
age Group / description	Confirm if needed	No
age Group / crop / id	Confirm if needed	No
age Group / crop / description	Confirm if needed	No
aromatic	Confirm if needed	No
low Gi	Confirm if needed	No
sticky	Confirm if needed	No
soft Cook Rice	Confirm if needed	No
general Cultivation	Confirm if needed	No
wz Only	Confirm if needed	No
salinity Areas	Confirm if needed	No
iron Toxicity	Confirm if needed	No
drought Tolerant	Confirm if needed	No
heat Tolerant	Confirm if needed	No
submergence Tolerant	Confirm if needed	No
cold Tolerant	Confirm if needed	No
acid Sulfate	Confirm if needed	No
upland	Confirm if needed	No
seed Testa Color	Confirm if needed	No
harvest In Many Picks	Confirm if needed	No
pod Fruit Bulb Size Unit	Confirm if needed	No
pod Fruit Bulb Color	Confirm if needed	No
pest Disease Resistance	Confirm if needed	No
number Of Seed For Pod	Confirm if needed	No
number Of Bulbs	Confirm if needed	No
pod Fruit Bulb Size	Confirm if needed	No
chilli Pungency Level	Confirm if needed	No
special Characteristics	Confirm if needed	No
harvest To Seed	Confirm if needed	No
multi Pick Per Variety DTOList	Confirm if needed	No
grain Category	Confirm if needed	No
age Group	Confirm if needed	No
pericarp Color	Confirm if needed	No
grain Type	Confirm if needed	No
pod Fruit Bulb Color / id	Confirm if needed	No
pod Fruit Bulb Color / code	Confirm if needed	No
pod Fruit Bulb Color / description	Confirm if needed	No
harti Items DTO	Confirm if needed	No

Export crops · Crop Production

Existing form reference: 31afd4eae072f89f

Field	Unit	Required

Agriculture seasons · Crop Production

Existing form reference: efb0fb9c6c849301

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
code	Confirm if needed	No
year	Confirm if needed	No
month	Confirm if needed	No
season Name	Confirm if needed	No
start Date	Confirm if needed	No
end Date	Confirm if needed	No

Soil type · Crop Production

Existing form reference: 1d04dae39fa034b0

Field	Unit	Required

Soil sub type · Crop Production

Existing form reference: 81565d03d3eabccd

Field	Unit	Required

Protected house types · Crop Production

Existing form reference: 2bc035148f6add4c

Field	Unit	Required

Seed certification â€” public seed crop configuration (crop categories & crops ã— seed classes) · Crop Production

Existing form reference: 19a450d00f625999

Field	Unit	Required

Seed production â€” seed availability of crop varieties · Crop Production

Existing form reference: eec11d5d5327dcd2

Field	Unit	Required

Paddy, OFC & VEG — 2025/26 Maha - November · Crop Production

Existing form reference: aa35b2a397b5c03d

Field	Unit	Required
Crop	Confirm if needed	No
District	Confirm if needed	No
Measure	Confirm if needed	No
Value	ha	No
Unit	Confirm if needed	No
Season	Confirm if needed	No

Roots & Tuber, Leafy Vege — 2025/26 Maha - November · Crop Production

Existing form reference: ddb475db65cb5155

Field	Unit	Required
Crop	Confirm if needed	No
District	Confirm if needed	No
Measure	Confirm if needed	No
Value	ha	No
Unit	Confirm if needed	No
Season	Confirm if needed	No

Fruit — 2025/26 Maha - November · Crop Production

Existing form reference: a58a0587ce2979e4

Field	Unit	Required
Crop	Confirm if needed	No
District	Confirm if needed	No
Measure	Confirm if needed	No
Value	ha	No
Unit	Confirm if needed	No
Season	Confirm if needed	No

Paddy, OFC & VEG — 2026 Yala - March · Crop Production

Existing form reference: 63278eb926593608

Field	Unit	Required
Crop	Confirm if needed	No
District	Confirm if needed	No
Measure	Confirm if needed	No
Value	ha	No
Unit	Confirm if needed	No
Season	Confirm if needed	No

Roots & Tuber, Leafy Vege — 2026 Yala - March · Crop Production

Existing form reference: f0b5ebbaf3b23649

Field	Unit	Required
Crop	Confirm if needed	No
District	Confirm if needed	No
Measure	Confirm if needed	No
Value	ha	No
Unit	Confirm if needed	No
Season	Confirm if needed	No

Fruit — 2026 Yala - March · Crop Production

Existing form reference: 198a6e47d9d0d6c7

Field	Unit	Required
Crop	Confirm if needed	No
District	Confirm if needed	No
Measure	Confirm if needed	No
Value	ha	No
Unit	Confirm if needed	No
Season	Confirm if needed	No

Paddy, OFC & VEG — 2026 Yala - April · Crop Production

Existing form reference: f2c8e1b979a467f1

Field	Unit	Required
Crop	Confirm if needed	No
District	Confirm if needed	No
Measure	Confirm if needed	No
Value	ha	No
Unit	Confirm if needed	No
Season	Confirm if needed	No

Roots & Tuber, Leafy Vege — 2026 Yala - April · Crop Production

Existing form reference: c73f38e8793641c8

Field	Unit	Required
Crop	Confirm if needed	No
District	Confirm if needed	No
Measure	Confirm if needed	No
Value	ha	No
Unit	Confirm if needed	No
Season	Confirm if needed	No

Fruit — 2026 Yala - April · Crop Production

Existing form reference: 718ca532ca18dd77

Field	Unit	Required
Crop	Confirm if needed	No
District	Confirm if needed	No
Measure	Confirm if needed	No
Value	ha	No
Unit	Confirm if needed	No
Season	Confirm if needed	No

Paddy area by irrigation scheme, 2015–2024 · Crop Production

Existing form reference: a12dececef469dda

Field	Unit	Required
Year	Confirm if needed	No
Published season label	Confirm if needed	No
Source block	Confirm if needed	No
Measure	Confirm if needed	No
Irrigation scheme	Confirm if needed	No
Area	ha	No

Paddy seed categories by district and season, 2020–2024 · Crop Production

Existing form reference: d0b6b5027371b418

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Season	Confirm if needed	No
Seed category	Confirm if needed	No
Sown area	ha	No

5. Documents and images

Your institution has its own document and image library. Use the same library for reports, photos and other evidence.

Open this screen for Department of Agriculture See the presentation example

Department of Agriculture Documents and images prototype screen — Department of Agriculture. Prototype screen. Select the image to enlarge it.

What you can try

Open Documents and images. Check the institution name.
Use All files, Documents or Images to find a file. Open its preview or download the original.
Use a sample file to try Add file. Private is the starting choice. Public needs a source, permission to share and review.
Use Access preview to try the institution reviewer and Public visitor views.

Files added in the prototype stay in this browser. Public sharing is an access preview. Existing public reference links already work online.

What your institution needs to confirm

Does a separate library for your institution meet your needs?Should new files start as Private for the permitted institution team?Should Public access require a review of the file and sharing permission?What documents and images will you store? Give the file types, usual sizes and need for earlier versions.Which job roles may add files, read Private files and approve Public files?Which files must stay Private? What permission, licence or expiry rule is needed for Public files?What else should change in this library?

6. Data structure management

Data structure keeps the existing source tree, records, charts and map. Manage structure adds a place to propose changes to definitions.

Open this screen for Department of Agriculture See the presentation example

Department of Agriculture Data structure management prototype screen — Department of Agriculture. Prototype screen. Select the image to enlarge it.

What you can try

Open Data structure and choose Manage structure.
Use Add base domain for a main information area. Add inside creates a subject area, a nested subject, an entity type or a field under the right parent.
Give the definition a clear name, code and meaning. Reuse an existing definition when the meaning is the same.
For a field, check the data type, unit, required value, limits and missing-value rule. Save a Draft, then try the separate reviewer view.

An entity type means a kind of thing or event, such as a reservoir or an inspection. Drafts stay in this browser. A demo approval does not change real definitions, data, chart links or sharing rights.

What your institution needs to confirm

Do the existing main topics and subject areas match your institution’s work?Should definition changes stay Draft until the responsible reviewer checks them?Is it right to reuse the same entity type or field when its meaning is the same?Which main topics, subject areas, entity types or fields should we add or change?Which units, choices, limits, decimal places and missing-value rules must each new field use?Which job roles may edit definitions and review them? Who owns each main information area?When a meaning, unit or calculation changes, what review and version history does your institution need?

7. Users and access

User management shows example profiles for each institution. People and Roles and access let you review the proposed account screens.

Open this screen for Department of Agriculture See the presentation example

Department of Agriculture Users and access prototype screen — Department of Agriculture. Prototype screen. Select the image to enlarge it.

What you can try

Open User management and choose the institution. The rows are examples, not a list of your staff.
Use View access to check a role. An administrator title alone does not give access to Private files.
Try Preview invitation or Preview access change. Check the role, start date, optional end date and reason.
Review the example permissions and tell us which job roles should receive each one.

These are interface previews only. They create no account, send no email and change no access. Use example details in the preview. Institution verification does not grant a real permission.

What your institution needs to confirm

Do the proposed role names and responsibilities match your institution?Should access be limited to the assigned institution and the agreed dates?Should reading Private files need a separate permission, even for an administrator?Which job roles should view data, add files, review Public requests, edit definitions and manage users?Who should approve new access, set an end date or remove access when someone changes duties?Which user fields, roles or access checks are missing? Give role names rather than passwords or private account details.

9. Anything else we should change?

Which decisions or services are missing?Which forms or fields should change? Give the existing form reference where possible.What should change in the entry, checking, expert, map or report steps?Are the English, Sinhala and Tamil words clear? Give the screen name, current word and your suggested wording.Who should join the next review and what should happen next?

Use the Download answers button at the top of this page. Share the downloaded file or printed copy through your agreed review channel. Nothing is sent automatically.

Department of Agriculture

1. Check a decision

2. Try the inputs

3. Check each decision

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Published district paddy yields

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

4. Existing data forms for your institution

5. Documents and images

What you can try

What your institution needs to confirm

6. Data structure management

What you can try

What your institution needs to confirm

7. Users and access

What you can try

What your institution needs to confirm

8. Can you share data regularly?

9. Anything else we should change?