Identify crop variety and irrigation patterns needing analysis.
Inputs, example and sources
United Nations Statistics Division · Handbook of Surveys on Households and Individuals Final Draft
Institution publication · Chapter 9, paragraphs 38 and 39, printed page 9-9, PDF page 417; Chapter 8 weighting
Local weights, population coverage, design variance and ratio-yield interpretation still need confirmation. Positive illustrative weights do not demonstrate every calibration design.
Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.
Analysis inputs. Final design weight [weight]; Indicator for the defined classification [0 or1]; Stratum and primary sampling unit
Other required evidence. Survey weights; crop; variety; irrigation mode; hectares; season; sampling frame.
Fictional worked example · 2025
Laggala Pallegama — agricultural patterns · Laggala Pallegama
| Input or result | Value | Unit |
|---|
| Final design weight | 2 | weight |
| Indicator for the defined classification | 1 | 0 or1 |
| Stratum and primary sampling unit | Upland farms / Rattota cluster | |
| Observed variable | 1 | 0 or1 |
|---|
Retain sampling frame, strata, clusters, nonresponse and calibration. The prototype does not invent complex-design variance, confidence intervals or small-area precision.
Proposed checking role. Survey statistician, subject-matter statistician and disclosure reviewer.
After the action. Precision, response, reproducibility and disclosure compliance.
- UN Handbook of Surveys on Households and Individuals — Institution publication. Chapters8 and9 weighting and analysis. Published weighting/analysis principles; complex-design variance is not replaced by a count.
- SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.
Institution and data context
Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.