District Secretariats

Tell us what to change or add.

Your name (optional)Your roleReview date

Continue a saved review

1. Check a decision

Open a decision below. Check the area, period, inputs, result and proposed next step.

2. Try the inputs

Use Example input to change a sample. Use Source input to check the fields and source details. The land-use change decision has its own comparison views.

Record your corrections below, then download your answers or print them.

3. Check each decision

1. Escalate overdue district project milestones 2. Choose what to handle first: aging district service requests 3. Coordinate investment in areas missing planned services 4. Follow up missing or outdated divisional returns 5. Compare district development priorities within resource limits 6. Allocate district response resources against verified needs 7. Find district activities without confirmed financing 8. Resolve cross-agency land issues delaying public works 9. Compare service access across district communities 10. Review overlapping assistance across district programmes 11. Escalate unresolved safeguards in district investments 12. Target administrative support to overloaded divisions 13. Resolve inter-agency grievances with clear ownership 14. Ensure affected groups are heard in district plans 15. Address documented exclusion from district services 16. Schedule district procurements affecting critical works 17. Check ownership and maintenance of completed public assets 18. Check district programme outcomes with stated limitations 19. Resolve district reporting boundary and code mismatches 20. Close district coordination cases with unmet dependencies

1. Escalate overdue district project milestonesDEC-DP29-001 · District projects · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Escalate overdue district project milestones.

Validation required

Method. Observed date minus planned date in calendar days. Missing actual dates are pending, not zero delay. Approved working-day rules require a defined calendar.

Next step. Review evidence. Investigate a material deviation, assign correction, or propose a target revision.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Planned milestone/sowing date; Observed completion/sowing date

Other required evidence. Project; approved milestone; actual progress; dependencies; funding; verification.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — district projects · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Planned milestone/sowing date	2025-06-01
Observed completion/sowing date	2025-06-09
Calendar date difference	8	days

Proposed checking role. District planning/service officer and relevant sector specialist.

After the action. Subsequent variance with original and revised targets retained.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

State land administration services — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
State Land Information Management System — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Home Affairs historical performance report: administration context — Government publication. Historical report: PDF pages 5-6; district, divisional and Grama Niladhari administration sections listed in contents. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

2. Choose what to handle first: aging district service requestsDEC-DP29-002 · Citizen services · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Prioritize aging district service requests.

Validation required

Method. Open age = assessment date − received date. Days past due = max(0, assessment date − recorded due date) for open cases. Show documented critical conditions separately.

Next step. Follow up overdue case. Assign the next permitted case, escalate an overdue case, request evidence, or close with proof.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Received or defect observed; Recorded due date; Assessment date; Case/work closed; Documented critical unresolved condition; Responsible office or maintainer; Actual closure date when closed

Other required evidence. Request; receipt; due date; responsible division; pauses; outcome.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — citizen services · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Received or defect observed	2025-04-01
Recorded due date	2025-06-01
Assessment date	2025-06-30
Case/work closed	No
Documented critical unresolved condition	Unknown
Responsible office or maintainer	Proposed responsible office
Actual closure date when closed
Open days past due	29	days
Calendar age	90	days

Example due dates are not legal service standards. Do not alter statutory deadlines by silently subtracting pauses, or infer severity from age alone.

Proposed checking role. District planning/service officer and relevant sector specialist.

After the action. Response time, aged cases, completion and reopened cases.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

State land administration services — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
State Land Information Management System — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Home Affairs historical performance report: administration context — Government publication. Historical report: PDF pages 5-6; district, divisional and Grama Niladhari administration sections listed in contents. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

3. Coordinate investment in areas missing planned servicesDEC-DP29-003 · Intervention coverage · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Coordinate investment in areas missing planned services.

Validation required

Method. 100 × distinct covered eligible units / eligible frame. Known uncovered = frame − covered − unknown.

Next step. Review evidence. Select eligible underserved units for outreach, investigate missing coverage, or revise the verified frame.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Required eligible frame [areas]; Distinct members of that frame covered [areas]; Frame members with unknown coverage [areas]

Other required evidence. Eligible areas; service need; existing interventions; verified coverage; geography.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — intervention coverage · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Required eligible frame	100	areas
Distinct members of that frame covered	65	areas
Frame members with unknown coverage	5	areas
Verified coverage	65	%
Known uncovered	30	areas
Unknown coverage	5	areas

Count each eligible unit once for the selected service and period. Received messages, attendance, adoption and outcomes are separate measures.

Proposed checking role. District planning/service officer and relevant sector specialist.

After the action. Verified eligible units receiving service and remaining unmet need.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

State land administration services — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
State Land Information Management System — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Home Affairs historical performance report: administration context — Government publication. Historical report: PDF pages 5-6; district, divisional and Grama Niladhari administration sections listed in contents. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

4. Follow up missing or outdated divisional returnsDEC-DP29-004 · District reporting · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Follow up missing or outdated divisional returns.

Validation required

Method. Completeness = 100 × valid / expected. Age = assessment date − latest valid observation; compare with the explicitly supplied interval.

Next step. Check overdue observation. Repair missed observations, contact the owner, or suspend stale evidence from current decisions.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Expected observations in the window [observations]; Distinct valid observations [observations]; Latest valid observation; Assessment date; Required observation interval [days]

Other required evidence. Required reports; reporting period; submissions; acceptance; source; deadline.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — district reporting · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Expected observations in the window	30	observations
Distinct valid observations	24	observations
Latest valid observation	2025-06-28
Assessment date	2025-06-30
Required observation interval	1	days
Completeness	80	%
Age of latest observation	2	days
Missing observations	6	observations

A recent observation does not fill earlier gaps. Unknown schedule or observation time cannot establish freshness.

Proposed checking role. District planning/service officer and relevant sector specialist.

After the action. Valid observations received on time and recurring gaps.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

State land administration services — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
State Land Information Management System — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Home Affairs historical performance report: administration context — Government publication. Historical report: PDF pages 5-6; district, divisional and Grama Niladhari administration sections listed in contents. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

5. Compare district development priorities within resource limitsDEC-DP29-005 · District planning · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Compare district development priorities within resource limits.

Validation required

Method. Budget minus option cost. Compare benefits, adverse effects and mandatory constraints separately; no weighted score or automatic best option.

Next step. Compare feasible trade-offs. Choose a feasible alternative with rationale and conditions, commission evidence, or defer.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Option cost [LKR]; Available budget [LKR]; Mandatory constraints; Expected benefit and its evidence; Resource needs and adverse effects

Other required evidence. Needs; project options; costs; benefits; safeguards; dependencies; budget.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Field-service coordination · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Option cost	1,500,000	LKR
Available budget	1,800,000	LKR
Mandatory constraints	Met
Expected benefit and its evidence	Compare district development priorities within resource limits; Needs and project options evidence needed
Resource needs and adverse effects	Sample water, labour, access and safeguard trade-offs
Budget remaining after option	300,000	LKR

Affordability does not prove feasibility or scientific suitability. A missing mandatory condition keeps an option unresolved.

Proposed checking role. District planning/service officer and relevant sector specialist.

After the action. Verified benefits, costs and adverse effects versus the agreed baseline.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

State land administration services — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
State Land Information Management System — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Home Affairs historical performance report: administration context — Government publication. Historical report: PDF pages 5-6; district, divisional and Grama Niladhari administration sections listed in contents. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

6. Allocate district response resources against verified needsDEC-DP29-006 · Disaster coordination · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Allocate district response resources against verified needs.

Validation required

Method. Usable capacity = rated capacity − documented unavailable capacity. Surplus/shortfall = usable − matching demand.

Next step. Review capacity shortfall. Redistribute usable resources, propose expansion, or manage demand within authorized limits.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Demand in the selected period [team hours]; Rated capacity for that period [team hours]; Unavailable or restricted capacity [team hours]

Other required evidence. Incident needs; teams; supplies; shelters; access; official priorities.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — disaster coordination · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Demand in the selected period	150	team hours
Rated capacity for that period	180	team hours
Unavailable or restricted capacity	45	team hours
Usable capacity minus demand	-15	team hours
Usable capacity	135	team hours

Match peak/average basis, time window, skill, staffing, accessibility and other binding constraints. One aggregate capacity does not override a safety constraint.

Proposed checking role. District planning/service officer and relevant sector specialist.

After the action. Actual usable capacity, unmet demand and service quality.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

State land administration services — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
State Land Information Management System — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Home Affairs historical performance report: administration context — Government publication. Historical report: PDF pages 5-6; district, divisional and Grama Niladhari administration sections listed in contents. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

7. Find district activities without confirmed financingDEC-DP29-007 · Funding coordination · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Identify district activities without confirmed financing.

Validation required

Method. Unfunded = need − commitments. Undisbursed = commitments − disbursements. Unspent = disbursements − eligible spending.

Next step. Review unfunded need. Resolve funding gaps, release only authorized commitments, or revise the finance plan.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Approved financing need [LKR]; Confirmed commitments [LKR]; Funds actually disbursed [LKR]; Verified eligible expenditure [LKR]

Other required evidence. Approved plan; commitments; disbursements; expenditure; counterpart funding; scope.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — funding coordination · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Approved financing need	3,500,000	LKR
Confirmed commitments	2,650,000	LKR
Funds actually disbursed	1,640,000	LKR
Verified eligible expenditure	1,200,000	LKR
Unfunded need	850,000	LKR
Committed but not disbursed	1,010,000	LKR
Disbursed but not spent	440,000	LKR

Keep commitments, cash receipts, expenditure and verified physical outputs separate. Negative balances flag overcommitment or reconciliation; no automatic accounting adjustment.

Proposed checking role. District planning/service officer and relevant sector specialist.

After the action. Verified funding, spend and deliverables reconciled without double counting.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

State land administration services — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
State Land Information Management System — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Home Affairs historical performance report: administration context — Government publication. Historical report: PDF pages 5-6; district, divisional and Grama Niladhari administration sections listed in contents. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

8. Resolve cross-agency land issues delaying public worksDEC-DP29-008 · Land coordination · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Resolve cross-agency land issues delaying public works.

Validation required

Method. 100 × distinct respondents / invited people. Record unresolved issues individually; one respondent may raise several issues.

Next step. Resolve participation barriers and issues. Address concerns, revise the proposal, seek required responses, or escalate unresolved conditions.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Distinct relevant people invited [people]; People who responded [people]; Unresolved issues [issues]; Proposal/version being discussed; Required participation channels accessible

Other required evidence. Parcels; project footprint; claims; agency responses; survey evidence; conditions.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — land coordination · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Distinct relevant people invited	95	people
People who responded	68	people
Unresolved issues	16	issues
Proposal/version being discussed	Sample proposal1
Required participation channels accessible	Unknown
Response share	71.579	%
Unresolved issues	16	issues

Response, attendance and silence are not consent. Participation does not transfer decision authority or settle rights.

Proposed checking role. District planning/service officer and relevant sector specialist.

After the action. Resolved concerns, participation and compliance with recorded commitments.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

State land administration services — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
State Land Information Management System — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Home Affairs historical performance report: administration context — Government publication. Historical report: PDF pages 5-6; district, divisional and Grama Niladhari administration sections listed in contents. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

9. Compare service access across district communitiesDEC-DP29-009 · Infrastructure access · Suggested priority: Medium

Try this decision

Compare service access across district communities.

Validation required

Method. Compare supplied route times/distances, usable capacity and documented access/window constraints. Display feasible candidates; no route optimization is implied.

Next step. Resolve access/capacity evidence. Choose a permitted feasible route, postpone, or request updated access evidence.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Verified route distance [km]; Estimated route travel time [minutes]; Usable vehicle/team capacity [units]; Required capacity [units]; Access, closures and operating conditions; Operating and service window

Other required evidence. Settlements; facilities; roads; travel restrictions; service capacity; travel time.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — infrastructure access · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Verified route distance	24	km
Estimated route travel time	65	minutes
Usable vehicle/team capacity	18	units
Required capacity	15	units
Access, closures and operating conditions	Unresolved
Operating and service window	Sample operating window
Estimated travel time	65	minutes
Capacity minus demand	3	units

Straight-line distance is not a road route. Example routes establish no current road status, emergency clearance or safe evacuation instruction.

Proposed checking role. District planning/service officer and relevant sector specialist.

After the action. Verified travel time, deliveries and unresolved access needs.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

State land administration services — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
State Land Information Management System — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Home Affairs historical performance report: administration context — Government publication. Historical report: PDF pages 5-6; district, divisional and Grama Niladhari administration sections listed in contents. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

10. Review overlapping assistance across district programmesDEC-DP29-010 · Beneficiary overlap · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Review overlapping assistance across district programmes.

Validation required

Method. Compare the same permitted entity, purpose and qualifying unit. Intersect dated support intervals; overlapping support is a review flag, not proof of duplicate entitlement.

Next step. Review possible overlap. Resolve duplicate identity or overlapping support and decide permitted complementary assistance.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Permitted recipient/service reference; Support purpose; Earlier support period begins; Earlier support period ends; Other support period begins; Other support period ends; Same purpose and qualifying unit

Other required evidence. Recipient ID; programme; purpose; period; entitlement; shared-use permission.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — beneficiary overlap · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Permitted recipient/service reference	Laggala Pallegama — beneficiary overlap
Support purpose	Sample seasonal input support
Earlier support period begins	2025-01-01
Earlier support period ends	2025-06-30
Other support period begins	2025-05-01
Other support period ends	2025-08-31
Same purpose and qualifying unit	Yes
Overlapping days	61	days

Proposed checking role. District planning/service officer and relevant sector specialist.

After the action. Confirmed unique support and unresolved overlap cases.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

State land administration services — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
State Land Information Management System — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Home Affairs historical performance report: administration context — Government publication. Historical report: PDF pages 5-6; district, divisional and Grama Niladhari administration sections listed in contents. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

11. Escalate unresolved safeguards in district investmentsDEC-DP29-011 · Safeguard follow-up · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Escalate unresolved safeguards in district investments.

Validation required

Method. Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.

Next step. Complete the evidence. Request correction, refer mandatory failures, or accept the inspected item with conditions.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Project approval; Project approval evidence reference; safeguard conditions; safeguard conditions evidence reference; inspections; inspections evidence reference; affected groups; affected groups evidence reference; due dates; due dates evidence reference

Other required evidence. Project approval; safeguard conditions; inspections; affected groups; due dates.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — safeguard follow-up · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Project approval	Missing
Project approval evidence reference
safeguard conditions	Documented
safeguard conditions evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
inspections	Documented
inspections evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
affected groups	Documented
affected groups evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
due dates	Documented
due dates evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
Evidence gaps	1	items

Evidence completeness alone cannot establish suitability, eligibility, safety, permission or method validity.

Proposed checking role. District planning/service officer and relevant sector specialist.

After the action. Evidence-backed corrective closure and recurring nonconformances.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

State land administration services — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
State Land Information Management System — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Home Affairs historical performance report: administration context — Government publication. Historical report: PDF pages 5-6; district, divisional and Grama Niladhari administration sections listed in contents. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

12. Target administrative support to overloaded divisionsDEC-DP29-012 · Divisional capacity · Suggested priority: Medium

Try this decision

Target administrative support to overloaded divisions.

Validation required

Method. Usable capacity = rated capacity − documented unavailable capacity. Surplus/shortfall = usable − matching demand.

Next step. Review capacity shortfall. Redistribute usable resources, propose expansion, or manage demand within authorized limits.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Demand in the selected period [staff hours]; Rated capacity for that period [staff hours]; Unavailable or restricted capacity [staff hours]

Other required evidence. Case volumes; processing time; staff availability; deadlines; complexity.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — divisional capacity · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Demand in the selected period	150	staff hours
Rated capacity for that period	180	staff hours
Unavailable or restricted capacity	45	staff hours
Usable capacity minus demand	-15	staff hours
Usable capacity	135	staff hours

Match peak/average basis, time window, skill, staffing, accessibility and other binding constraints. One aggregate capacity does not override a safety constraint.

Proposed checking role. District planning/service officer and relevant sector specialist.

After the action. Actual usable capacity, unmet demand and service quality.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

State land administration services — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
State Land Information Management System — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Home Affairs historical performance report: administration context — Government publication. Historical report: PDF pages 5-6; district, divisional and Grama Niladhari administration sections listed in contents. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

13. Resolve inter-agency grievances with clear ownershipDEC-DP29-013 · District grievances · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Resolve inter-agency grievances with clear ownership.

Validation required

Method. Open age = assessment date − received date. Days past due = max(0, assessment date − recorded due date) for open cases. Show documented critical conditions separately.

Next step. Follow up overdue case. Assign the next permitted case, escalate an overdue case, request evidence, or close with proof.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Other required evidence. Case; involved agencies; response dates; jurisdiction; outstanding issues; escalation.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — district grievances · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Received or defect observed	2025-04-01
Recorded due date	2025-06-01
Assessment date	2025-06-30
Case/work closed	No
Documented critical unresolved condition	Unknown
Responsible office or maintainer	Proposed responsible office
Actual closure date when closed
Open days past due	29	days
Calendar age	90	days

Example due dates are not legal service standards. Do not alter statutory deadlines by silently subtracting pauses, or infer severity from age alone.

Proposed checking role. District planning/service officer and relevant sector specialist.

After the action. Response time, aged cases, completion and reopened cases.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

State land administration services — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
State Land Information Management System — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Home Affairs historical performance report: administration context — Government publication. Historical report: PDF pages 5-6; district, divisional and Grama Niladhari administration sections listed in contents. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

14. Ensure affected groups are heard in district plansDEC-DP29-014 · Public consultation · Suggested priority: Medium

Try this decision

Ensure affected groups are heard in district plans.

Validation required

Method. 100 × distinct respondents / invited people. Record unresolved issues individually; one respondent may raise several issues.

Next step. Resolve participation barriers and issues. Address concerns, revise the proposal, seek required responses, or escalate unresolved conditions.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Distinct relevant people invited [people]; People who responded [people]; Unresolved issues [issues]; Proposal/version being discussed; Required participation channels accessible

Other required evidence. Plan version; stakeholder frame; participation; responses; unresolved concerns.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — public consultation · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Distinct relevant people invited	95	people
People who responded	68	people
Unresolved issues	16	issues
Proposal/version being discussed	Sample proposal1
Required participation channels accessible	Unknown
Response share	71.579	%
Unresolved issues	16	issues

Response, attendance and silence are not consent. Participation does not transfer decision authority or settle rights.

Proposed checking role. District planning/service officer and relevant sector specialist.

After the action. Resolved concerns, participation and compliance with recorded commitments.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

State land administration services — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
State Land Information Management System — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Home Affairs historical performance report: administration context — Government publication. Historical report: PDF pages 5-6; district, divisional and Grama Niladhari administration sections listed in contents. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

15. Address documented exclusion from district servicesDEC-DP29-015 · Programme inclusion · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Address documented exclusion from district services.

Validation required

Method. 100 × distinct covered eligible units / eligible frame. Known uncovered = frame − covered − unknown.

Next step. Review evidence. Select eligible underserved units for outreach, investigate missing coverage, or revise the verified frame.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Required eligible frame [areas]; Distinct members of that frame covered [areas]; Frame members with unknown coverage [areas]

Other required evidence. Eligible population; unique service users; consented attributes; locations; unmet need.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — programme inclusion · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Required eligible frame	100	areas
Distinct members of that frame covered	65	areas
Frame members with unknown coverage	5	areas
Verified coverage	65	%
Known uncovered	30	areas
Unknown coverage	5	areas

Count each eligible unit once for the selected service and period. Received messages, attendance, adoption and outcomes are separate measures.

Proposed checking role. District planning/service officer and relevant sector specialist.

After the action. Verified eligible units receiving service and remaining unmet need.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

State land administration services — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
State Land Information Management System — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Home Affairs historical performance report: administration context — Government publication. Historical report: PDF pages 5-6; district, divisional and Grama Niladhari administration sections listed in contents. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

16. Schedule district procurements affecting critical worksDEC-DP29-016 · Procurement dependencies · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Schedule district procurements affecting critical works.

Validation required

Method. Check start/end order, operating window, effort, predecessor completion and overlapping bookings for the same resource. A conflict is flagged; no optimal schedule is invented.

Next step. Resolve overlapping resource bookings. Assign a feasible timetable, redistribute resources, or escalate the blocked dependency.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Required resource; Task start; Task end; Earliest permitted start; Latest permitted finish; Required resource effort [hours]; Available resource effort [hours]; Predecessor task reference; Mandatory permits and prerequisites

Other required evidence. Package; approvals; lead time; dependencies; resource needs; delivery window.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — procurement dependencies · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Required resource	Watershed field team
Task start	2025-06-01
Task end	2025-06-04
Earliest permitted start	2025-05-28
Latest permitted finish	2025-06-08
Required resource effort	16	hours
Available resource effort	24	hours
Predecessor task reference	None
Mandatory permits and prerequisites	Met
Planned duration	3	days
Resource hours remaining	8	hours

Proposed checking role. District planning/service officer and relevant sector specialist.

After the action. On-time completion with verified outputs and resource use.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

State land administration services — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
State Land Information Management System — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Home Affairs historical performance report: administration context — Government publication. Historical report: PDF pages 5-6; district, divisional and Grama Niladhari administration sections listed in contents. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

17. Check ownership and maintenance of completed public assetsDEC-DP29-017 · Asset handover · Suggested priority: Medium

Try this decision

Verify ownership and maintenance of completed public assets.

Validation required

Method. Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.

Next step. Complete the evidence. Request correction, refer mandatory failures, or accept the inspected item with conditions.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Asset; Asset evidence reference; acceptance evidence; acceptance evidence evidence reference; assigned owner; assigned owner evidence reference; maintenance budget; maintenance budget evidence reference; handover conditions; handover conditions evidence reference

Other required evidence. Asset; acceptance evidence; assigned owner; maintenance budget; handover conditions.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — asset handover · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Asset	Missing
Asset evidence reference
acceptance evidence	Documented
acceptance evidence evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
assigned owner	Documented
assigned owner evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
maintenance budget	Documented
maintenance budget evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
handover conditions	Documented
handover conditions evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
Evidence gaps	1	items

Evidence completeness alone cannot establish suitability, eligibility, safety, permission or method validity.

Proposed checking role. District planning/service officer and relevant sector specialist.

After the action. Evidence-backed corrective closure and recurring nonconformances.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

State land administration services — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
State Land Information Management System — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Home Affairs historical performance report: administration context — Government publication. Historical report: PDF pages 5-6; district, divisional and Grama Niladhari administration sections listed in contents. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

18. Check district programme outcomes with stated limitationsDEC-DP29-018 · Outcome reporting · Suggested priority: Medium

Try this decision

Assess district programme outcomes with stated limitations.

Verified published formula · Difference-in-differences arithmetic

Method. (Treatment after−before) − (comparison after−before), using the same outcome definition and periods.

Next step. Supply study-design evidence. Continue, adapt, expand or stop a programme based on defensible outcome evidence.

Inputs, example and sources

World Bank · Impact Evaluation in Practice Second Edition
Institution publication · Chapter 7, table 7.2, printed page 140, PDF page 170

The formula is verified. Causal interpretation still requires a defensible study design, comparison and assumptions.

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Treatment Verified programme outcome before [specified outcome unit]; Treatment Verified programme outcome after [specified outcome unit]; Comparison Verified programme outcome before [specified outcome unit]; Comparison Verified programme outcome after [specified outcome unit]; Study design and comparability evidence; Outcome definition, method and reference basis

Other required evidence. Baseline; follow-up; programme exposure; comparison; external conditions; uncertainty.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — outcome reporting · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Treatment Verified programme outcome before	42	specified outcome unit
Treatment Verified programme outcome after	59	specified outcome unit
Comparison Verified programme outcome before	39	specified outcome unit
Comparison Verified programme outcome after	46	specified outcome unit
Study design and comparability evidence	Missing
Outcome definition, method and reference basis	Verified programme outcome /example matching definition1
Difference in changes	10	specified outcome unit

The arithmetic alone does not establish causation. Design, parallel trends, confounding, attrition, uncertainty and adverse effects need appropriate evidence.

Proposed checking role. District planning/service officer and relevant sector specialist.

After the action. Verified outcomes, costs, distributional effects and evidence strength.

World Bank Impact Evaluation in Practice Second Edition — Institution publication. Chapter7 difference-in-differences. Published difference-in-differences estimator and study assumptions; aggregate examples do not establish causation.
SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

State land administration services — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
State Land Information Management System — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Home Affairs historical performance report: administration context — Government publication. Historical report: PDF pages 5-6; district, divisional and Grama Niladhari administration sections listed in contents. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

19. Resolve district reporting boundary and code mismatchesDEC-DP29-019 · Geographic consistency · Suggested priority: Lower

Try this decision

Resolve district reporting boundary and code mismatches.

Validation required

Method. Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.

Next step. Complete the evidence. Approve a documented mapping, keep it Draft, or create a governed concept after review.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Source geography; Source geography evidence reference; official code; official code evidence reference; boundary edition; boundary edition evidence reference; period; period evidence reference; crosswalk evidence; crosswalk evidence evidence reference

Other required evidence. Source geography; official code; boundary edition; period; crosswalk evidence.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — geographic consistency · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Source geography	Missing
Source geography evidence reference
official code	Documented
official code evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
boundary edition	Documented
boundary edition evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
period	Documented
period evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
crosswalk evidence	Documented
crosswalk evidence evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
Evidence gaps	1	items

Evidence completeness alone cannot establish suitability, eligibility, safety, permission or method validity.

Proposed checking role. District planning/service officer and relevant sector specialist.

After the action. Unmapped/conflicting concepts and history preserved across revisions.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

State land administration services — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
State Land Information Management System — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Home Affairs historical performance report: administration context — Government publication. Historical report: PDF pages 5-6; district, divisional and Grama Niladhari administration sections listed in contents. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

20. Close district coordination cases with unmet dependenciesDEC-DP29-020 · Inter-agency decisions · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Close district coordination cases with unmet dependencies.

Validation required

Method. 100 × distinct respondents / invited people. Record unresolved issues individually; one respondent may raise several issues.

Next step. Resolve participation barriers and issues. Address concerns, revise the proposal, seek required responses, or escalate unresolved conditions.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Distinct relevant people invited [people]; People who responded [people]; Unresolved issues [issues]; Proposal/version being discussed; Required participation channels accessible

Other required evidence. Decision; required agencies; responses; conditions; responsible authority; evidence.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — inter-agency decisions · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Distinct relevant people invited	95	people
People who responded	68	people
Unresolved issues	16	issues
Proposal/version being discussed	Sample proposal1
Required participation channels accessible	Unknown
Response share	71.579	%
Unresolved issues	16	issues

Response, attendance and silence are not consent. Participation does not transfer decision authority or settle rights.

Proposed checking role. District planning/service officer and relevant sector specialist.

After the action. Resolved concerns, participation and compliance with recorded commitments.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

State land administration services — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
State Land Information Management System — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Home Affairs historical performance report: administration context — Government publication. Historical report: PDF pages 5-6; district, divisional and Grama Niladhari administration sections listed in contents. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

4. Existing data forms for your institution

Check which existing source fields can supply the decision inputs.

Gram Niladhari Divisions · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: 6ffaab5927d760f2

Field	Unit	Required
GND Name	Confirm if needed	No
GND Code	Confirm if needed	No
GND Number	Confirm if needed	No
GND Name Gazetted	Confirm if needed	No
DS Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
DS Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
District Name	Confirm if needed	No
District Code	Confirm if needed	No
Province Name	Confirm if needed	No
Province Code	Confirm if needed	No
MC UC PC Name	Confirm if needed	No
GND Officer Name	Confirm if needed	No
Dispute	Confirm if needed	No
Province Census Code	Confirm if needed	No
District Census Code	Confirm if needed	No
DS Division Census Code	Confirm if needed	No
GND Census Code	Confirm if needed	No
GND No Census	Confirm if needed	No
GND Name Census	Confirm if needed	No
Admin Code	Confirm if needed	No
CM Index	Confirm if needed	No
GND Number Gazetted	Confirm if needed	No
Year Created	Confirm if needed	No
Data Source	Confirm if needed	No
Method Of Creation	Confirm if needed	No
Extent	Confirm if needed	No
st_area(shape)	Confirm if needed	No
st_length(shape)	Confirm if needed	No

Divisional Secretariat Boundary · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: 38b3db2354e6f075

Field	Unit	Required
DS Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
DS Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
District Name	Confirm if needed	No
District Code	Confirm if needed	No
Province Name	Confirm if needed	No
Province Code	Confirm if needed	No
Adjusted Area	Confirm if needed	No
Description	Confirm if needed	No
st_area(shape)	Confirm if needed	No
st_length(shape)	Confirm if needed	No

District Boundary · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: 3e275a626091b924

Field	Unit	Required
District Name	Confirm if needed	No
District Code	Confirm if needed	No
Province Name	Confirm if needed	No
Province Code	Confirm if needed	No
Adjusted Area	Confirm if needed	No
Description	Confirm if needed	No
st_area(shape)	Confirm if needed	No
st_length(shape)	Confirm if needed	No

Province Boundary · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: c2c98ee086137a9b

Field	Unit	Required
Province Name	Confirm if needed	No
Province Code	Confirm if needed	No
ISO Alpha 2 Code	Confirm if needed	No
Area True	Confirm if needed	No
Area Adjust	Confirm if needed	No
Description	Confirm if needed	No
st_area(shape)	Confirm if needed	No
st_length(shape)	Confirm if needed	No

Provinces · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: 34b688f04ba12422

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
name	Confirm if needed	No
code	Confirm if needed	No

Districts · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: f25025b360be4121

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
name	Confirm if needed	No
code	Confirm if needed	No
province DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
province DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
province DTO / code	Confirm if needed	No

Ds divisions · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: b89e70ac83fb5930

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
code	Confirm if needed	No
name	Confirm if needed	No
district DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
district DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
district DTO / code	Confirm if needed	No
created Date	Confirm if needed	No
modified Date	Confirm if needed	No

Gn divisions · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: 8f42b4909736031c

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
name	Confirm if needed	No
code	Confirm if needed	No
created Date	Confirm if needed	No
modified Date	Confirm if needed	No
land Area	Confirm if needed	No
agricultural Land Area	Confirm if needed	No
non Agricultural Land Area	Confirm if needed	No
crop Area	Confirm if needed	No
agro Ecological Zone DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
agro Ecological Zone DTO / ae Zone Id	Confirm if needed	No
agro Ecological Zone DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
agro Ecological Zone DTO / average Rainfall	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / region Id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / asc Region Id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / province Segment Id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / provincial Dd Id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / pro Director Level DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / pro Director Level DTO / pro Director Id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / pro Director Level DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / pro Director Level DTO / city	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / pro Director Level DTO / latitude	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / pro Director Level DTO / longitude	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / city	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / latitude	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / pro Deputy Director Level DTO / longitude	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / city	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / latitude	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / provincial Ada Segment DTO / longitude	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / code	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / district DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / district DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / district DTO / code	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / district DTO / province DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / district DTO / province DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / district DTO / province DTO / code	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / arpa Id	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / id	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / asc Id	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / name	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / district Commissioner Level DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / district Commissioner Level DTO / district Comm Id	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / district Commissioner Level DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / district Commissioner Level DTO / do Agrarian Development DTO	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / district Commissioner Level DTO / created Date	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / district Commissioner Level DTO / modified Date	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / district Commissioner Level DTO / city	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / district Commissioner Level DTO / latitude	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / district Commissioner Level DTO / longitude	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / created Date	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / modified Date	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / city	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / latitude	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / asc Dto / longitude	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / created Date	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / modified Date	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / city	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / latitude	Confirm if needed	No
arpa DTO / longitude	Confirm if needed	No
gn Division Type	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / inter Provincial Ada Segment DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / inter Provincial Ada Segment DTO / segment Id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / inter Provincial Ada Segment DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / inter Provincial Ada Segment DTO / inter Province Deputy Director Level DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / inter Provincial Ada Segment DTO / inter Province Deputy Director Level DTO / dd Id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / inter Provincial Ada Segment DTO / inter Province Deputy Director Level DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / inter Provincial Ada Segment DTO / inter Province Deputy Director Level DTO / director Doa DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / inter Provincial Ada Segment DTO / inter Province Deputy Director Level DTO / director Doa DTO / doa Id	Confirm if needed	No
ai Regions DTO / inter Provincial Ada Segment DTO / inter Province Deputy Director Level DTO / director Doa DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Unit DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Unit DTO / unit Id	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Unit DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / district DTO / province DTO / created Date	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / district DTO / province DTO / modified Date	Confirm if needed	No
scs Sub Region Id	Confirm if needed	No
scs Sub Region Dto / id	Confirm if needed	No
scs Sub Region Dto / code	Confirm if needed	No
scs Sub Region Dto / description	Confirm if needed	No
scs Sub Region Dto / scs Region	Confirm if needed	No

Provincial director divisions · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: 2337b92f31770ba9

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
pro Director Id	Confirm if needed	No
description	Confirm if needed	No
city	Confirm if needed	No
latitude	Confirm if needed	No
longitude	Confirm if needed	No

Provincial deputy director level · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: ca12c4d677b5003c

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
provincial Dd Id	Confirm if needed	No
description	Confirm if needed	No
pro Director Level DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
pro Director Level DTO / pro Director Id	Confirm if needed	No
pro Director Level DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
pro Director Level DTO / city	Confirm if needed	No
pro Director Level DTO / latitude	Confirm if needed	No
pro Director Level DTO / longitude	Confirm if needed	No
city	Confirm if needed	No
latitude	Confirm if needed	No
longitude	Confirm if needed	No

Doa divisions · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: eb2b3109790a85b0

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
doa Id	Confirm if needed	No
description	Confirm if needed	No

Inter-provincial ada divisions · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: 3c4b7ca01eae2c96

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
segment Id	Confirm if needed	No
description	Confirm if needed	No
inter Province Deputy Director Level DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
inter Province Deputy Director Level DTO / dd Id	Confirm if needed	No
inter Province Deputy Director Level DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No

Mahaweli authorities · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: a928ea0c164539db

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
authority Id	Confirm if needed	No
description	Confirm if needed	No
city	Confirm if needed	No
latitude	Confirm if needed	No
longitude	Confirm if needed	No

Mahaweli systems · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: 8e71c080613ac3a4

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
system Id	Confirm if needed	No
description	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Authority DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Authority DTO / authority Id	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Authority DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Authority DTO / city	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Authority DTO / latitude	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Authority DTO / longitude	Confirm if needed	No
city	Confirm if needed	No
latitude	Confirm if needed	No
longitude	Confirm if needed	No

Mahaweli blocks · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: 1b6608ff1b096b55

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
code	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli System DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli System DTO / system Id	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli System DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli System DTO / mahaweli Authority DTO	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli System DTO / city	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli System DTO / latitude	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli System DTO / longitude	Confirm if needed	No
description	Confirm if needed	No
land Area	Confirm if needed	No
cultivated Area	Confirm if needed	No
irrigated Area	Confirm if needed	No
non Irrigated Area	Confirm if needed	No
created Date	Confirm if needed	No
modified Date	Confirm if needed	No
district DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
district DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
district DTO / code	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / code	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / created Date	Confirm if needed	No
ds Division DTO / modified Date	Confirm if needed	No

Mahaweli units · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: b2dbe12695570d5c

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
unit Id	Confirm if needed	No
description	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Block DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Block DTO / description	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Block DTO / land Area	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Block DTO / cultivated Area	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Block DTO / irrigated Area	Confirm if needed	No
mahaweli Block DTO / non Irrigated Area	Confirm if needed	No

Agrarian development divisions · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: fc991a6c3bc249f6

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
do Agrarian Development Id	Confirm if needed	No
name	Confirm if needed	No
created Date	Confirm if needed	No
modified Date	Confirm if needed	No
city	Confirm if needed	No
latitude	Confirm if needed	No
longitude	Confirm if needed	No

District commissioner divisions · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: 57c890c642eab82c

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
district Comm Id	Confirm if needed	No
name	Confirm if needed	No
do Agrarian Development DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
do Agrarian Development DTO / do Agrarian Development Id	Confirm if needed	No
do Agrarian Development DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
do Agrarian Development DTO / created Date	Confirm if needed	No
do Agrarian Development DTO / modified Date	Confirm if needed	No
do Agrarian Development DTO / city	Confirm if needed	No
do Agrarian Development DTO / latitude	Confirm if needed	No
do Agrarian Development DTO / longitude	Confirm if needed	No
created Date	Confirm if needed	No
modified Date	Confirm if needed	No
city	Confirm if needed	No
latitude	Confirm if needed	No
longitude	Confirm if needed	No

Asc divisions · Administrative & Planning Areas

Existing form reference: 0bb5ed17e5cdc863

Field	Unit	Required
id	Confirm if needed	No
asc Id	Confirm if needed	No
name	Confirm if needed	No
district Commissioner Level DTO / id	Confirm if needed	No
district Commissioner Level DTO / district Comm Id	Confirm if needed	No
district Commissioner Level DTO / name	Confirm if needed	No
district Commissioner Level DTO / do Agrarian Development DTO	Confirm if needed	No
district Commissioner Level DTO / created Date	Confirm if needed	No
district Commissioner Level DTO / modified Date	Confirm if needed	No
district Commissioner Level DTO / city	Confirm if needed	No
district Commissioner Level DTO / latitude	Confirm if needed	No
district Commissioner Level DTO / longitude	Confirm if needed	No
created Date	Confirm if needed	No
modified Date	Confirm if needed	No
city	Confirm if needed	No
latitude	Confirm if needed	No
longitude	Confirm if needed	No

Population Information by Grama Niladhari Division, CPH-2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 3758c98eb50413af

Field	Unit	Required
Province Code	Confirm if needed	No
Province Name	Confirm if needed	No
District Code	Confirm if needed	No
District Name	Confirm if needed	No
DS_Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
DS_Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Number	Confirm if needed	No
Sex / Total	persons	No
Sex / Male	persons	No
Sex / Female	persons	No
Age_Group / Total	persons	No
Age_Group / 0 - 14	persons	No
Age_Group / 15 - 59	persons	No
Age_Group / 60 - 64	persons	No
Age_Group / 65 and above	persons	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Occupied Housing Units by Grama Niladhari Division · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 8372d13713031913

Field	Unit	Required
Province Code	Confirm if needed	No
Province Name	Confirm if needed	No
District Code	Confirm if needed	No
District Name	Confirm if needed	No
DS_Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
DS_Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Number	Confirm if needed	No
Occupied Housing Units	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Information on Occupied Housing Units by Grama Niladhari Division, CPH-2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: e7e1c2657503020f

Field	Unit	Required
Province Code	Confirm if needed	No
Province Name	Confirm if needed	No
District Code	Confirm if needed	No
District Name	Confirm if needed	No
DS_Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
DS_Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Number	Confirm if needed	No
Occupied Housing Units	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Single house - single storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Single house - two storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Single house - more than two storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Attached house - 1st Floor	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Attached house - 2nd Floor	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Attached house - From 3 to 4 Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Attached house - From 5 to 10 Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Attached house - From 11to 19 Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Attached house - From 20 Floors or more	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Bricks	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Cement block	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Granite/ Cube stones	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Cabook	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Pressed soil bricks	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Warichchi / Mud	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Cadjan/ Palmyrah	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Planks/ Metal Sheets/ Asbestos	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Zink Aluminium Sheets	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Other (specify)	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Not relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Cement	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Terrazzo/Tile/Granite/Wood (Finished)	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Concrete	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Mud	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Wood	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Sand	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Other (specify)	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Not relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Tile	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Asbestos	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Concrete	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Zink Aluminium Sheet	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Metal Sheet	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Cadjan/ Palmyrah/ Straw	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Other (specify)	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Not relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Household Information by Grama Niladhari Division, CPH-2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: da744a0cfc8f5c9f

Field	Unit	Required
Province Code	Confirm if needed	No
Province Name	Confirm if needed	No
District Code	Confirm if needed	No
District Name	Confirm if needed	No
DS_Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
DS_Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Number	Confirm if needed	No
Number of Households	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Ground Water / Protected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Ground Water / Semi protected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Ground Water / Unprotected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Ground Water / Tube well	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Ground Water / Spring/ Fountain	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Pipe borne water - National water supply & drainage board	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Pipe borne water - Local Authority	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Pipe borne water - Community base organiziation	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Pipe borne water - Private water supply project	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Other / Tank/ River/Streams	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Other / Rain water	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Other / Bottled water	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Other / Filter water (R.O. Plant)	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Other / Bowser	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Other / Other (specify)	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Fire wood	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Kerosene	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Electricity	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Saw dust/Paddy husk	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Bio gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Other (Specify bellow )	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Not relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of Lighting / Electricity - from National grid/rural hydro power project	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of Lighting / Kerosene lamp	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of Lighting / Solar power (grid connected)	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of Lighting / Solar power (stand alone)	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of Lighting / Bio gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of Lighting / Generator	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of Lighting / Other (Specify bellow )	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Within the unit / Within the housing unit - Exclusively for the household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Within the unit / Within the housing unit - Sharing with another household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Outside the unit / Within Premises - Exclusively for the household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Outside the unit / Within Premises - Sharing with another household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / No toilet but sharing with another housing unit/units	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / Common/ Public toilet	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / Not using a toilet (use jungle, beach and open ground)	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

GN Level Population by Ethnic Group, CPH 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: e5112accd6912288

Field	Unit	Required
District Code	Confirm if needed	No
District Name	Confirm if needed	No
DSD Code	Confirm if needed	No
DSD Name	persons	No
GND Code	Confirm if needed	No
GND Name	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Total	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Sinhalese	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Sri Lanka Tamil	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Indian Tamil/ Malaiyaga Thamilar	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Sri Lanka Moor/Muslim	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Burgher	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Malay	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Sri Lanka Chetty	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Bharatha	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Veddahs	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Other	persons	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

GN Level Population by Five Year Age Group, CPH 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: bb924a4e93f0a33d

Field	Unit	Required
District Code	Confirm if needed	No
District Name	Confirm if needed	No
DSD Code	Confirm if needed	No
DSD Name	persons	No
GND Code	Confirm if needed	No
GND Name	persons	No
Age Group / Total	persons	No
Age Group / 0 - 4	persons	No
Age Group / 5 - 9	persons	No
Age Group / 10-14	persons	No
Age Group / 15-19	persons	No
Age Group / 20-24	persons	No
Age Group / 25-29	persons	No
Age Group / 30-34	persons	No
Age Group / 35-39	persons	No
Age Group / 40-44	persons	No
Age Group / 45-49	persons	No
Age Group / 50-54	persons	No
Age Group / 55-59	persons	No
Age Group / 60-64	persons	No
Age Group / 65-69	persons	No
Age Group / 70-74	persons	No
Age Group / 75-79	persons	No
Age Group / 80-84	persons	No
Age Group / 85-89	persons	No
Age Group / 90-94	persons	No
Age Group / 95 and above	persons	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

GN Level Population by Local Government Area, CPH 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 05d85f4e809f399c

Field	Unit	Required
District Code	Confirm if needed	No
District Name	Confirm if needed	No
DSD Code	Confirm if needed	No
DSD Name	persons	No
GND Code	Confirm if needed	No
GND Name	persons	No
Sector / Total	persons	No
Sector / Municiple Council	persons	No
Sector / Urban Council	persons	No
Sector / Pradeshiya Sabha	persons	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

GN Level Population by Religion, CPH 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 9fe44f410d52a912

Field	Unit	Required
District Code	Confirm if needed	No
District Name	Confirm if needed	No
DSD Code	Confirm if needed	No
DSD Name	persons	No
GND Code	Confirm if needed	No
GND Name	persons	No
Religion / Total	persons	No
Religion / Buddhist	persons	No
Religion / Hindu	persons	No
Religion / Islam	persons	No
Religion / Roman Catholic	persons	No
Religion / Other Christian	persons	No
Religion / Other	persons	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

GN Level Population by Sector, CPH 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: a96d28bdb2a7a507

Field	Unit	Required
District Code	Confirm if needed	No
District Name	Confirm if needed	No
DSD Code	Confirm if needed	No
DSD Name	persons	No
GND Code	Confirm if needed	No
GND Name	persons	No
Sector / Total	persons	No
Sector / Urban*	persons	No
Sector / Rural	persons	No
Sector / Estate Rural**	persons	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Population by sex and age according to districts, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: e937770c5212a493

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Total number of persons	persons	No
Sex / Male	persons	No
Sex / Female	persons	No
Age / Less than 15 years	persons	No
Age / 15 ‐ 59 Years	persons	No
Age / 60-64 Years	persons	No
Age / 65 years and over	persons	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Population by ethnic group according to districts, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 5830f8c01719d23d

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Total number of persons	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Sinhalees	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Sri lanka Tamil	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Indian Tamil/ Malaiyaga Thamilar	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Sri Lanka Moor/Muslim	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Burgher	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Malay	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Sri Lanka Chetty	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Bharatha	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Veddhas	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Other	persons	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Population by religion according to districts, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 596bd468dd17458f

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Total number of persons	persons	No
Religion / Buddhist	persons	No
Religion / Hindu	persons	No
Religion / Islam	persons	No
Religion / Roman Catholic	persons	No
Religion / Other Christian	persons	No
Religion / Other	persons	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Migrant population by reason for migrating according to districts, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 322c7e6af73ccfe3

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Total migrant population	Confirm if needed	No
Main reason for migration / Marriage	Confirm if needed	No
Main reason for migration / Employment / Searching for a job	Confirm if needed	No
Main reason for migration / Education	Confirm if needed	No
Main reason for migration / Accompanied a family member	Confirm if needed	No
Main reason for migration / Returning for permanent	Confirm if needed	No
Main reason for migration / Development project	Confirm if needed	No
Main reason for migration / Resettled after displacement	Confirm if needed	No
Main reason for migration / A disaster / a displaced happened in the prior place	Confirm if needed	No
Main reason for migration / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Population by sex, age according to Divisional Secretariat Divisions, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 010da3c91df400eb

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary's Division	Confirm if needed	No
Total number of persons	persons	No
Sex / Male	persons	No
Sex / Female	persons	No
Age / Less than 15 years	persons	No
Age / 15 ‐ 59 Years	persons	No
Age / 60-64 Years	persons	No
Age / 65 years and over	persons	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Population by ethnicity according to Divisional SSecretariat Divisions, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 7053ac00629aeff8

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary's Division	Confirm if needed	No
Total number of persons	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Sinhalees	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Sri lanka Tamil	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Indian Tamil/ Malaiyaga Thamilar	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Sri Lanka Moor/Muslim	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Burgher	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Malay	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Sri Lanka Chetty	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Bharatha	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Veddhas	persons	No
Ethnic Group / Other	persons	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Population by religion according to Divisional Secretariat Divisions, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 36222798f483fabe

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary's Division	Confirm if needed	No
Total number of persons	persons	No
Religion / Buddhist	persons	No
Religion / Hindu	persons	No
Religion / Islam	persons	No
Religion / Roman Catholic	persons	No
Religion / Other Christian	persons	No
Religion / Other	persons	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by housing unit structure at district level 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: a2103035c8ce0bac

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Single house - Single storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Single house - Two storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Single house - more than two storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Attached House - 1st Floor	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Attached House - 2nd Floor	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Attached House - 3rd or 4th Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Attached House - 5th to 10th Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Attached House - 11th to 19th Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Attached House - From 20th Floors or more	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by main material used for walls construction at district level, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 41eb1069e9c9c17d

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Brick	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Cement block	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Granite/Cube stones	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Cabook	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Pressed soil bricks	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Mud/Warichchi	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Kadjan/ Palmyrah	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Plank/ Metal Sheet/Asbestos	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Zink Aluminium Sheets	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Not Relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by main material used for roof construction at district level, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 74f863b697ebe277

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Tile	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Asbestos	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Concrete	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Zink Aluminium Sheet	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Metal Sheet	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / cadjan/ Palmyrah/Straw	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Not Relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by main material used for floor construction at district level, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 78b642444e82761a

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Cement	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Terrazzo/Tile/Granite/Wood(finished)/Titanium	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Concrete	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Mud	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Wood	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Sand	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Other	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Not Relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households by main source of drinking water at district level, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: ef0674489fe2bdc3

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Protected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Semi Protected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Unprotected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Tube Well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Spring/Fountain	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / National Water Supply &drainage board	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Local Authority	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Community base Organiziation	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Private Water Supply Project	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Tank/River/Streams	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Rain Water	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Bottled water	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / மீள் வடிகட்டல் ஆலை (R.O. Plant) Filter water(R.O.plant)	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Bowser	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households by Main Source of EnergyFuel Used for Cooking at District, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 018e27b1cfd72a36

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Fire wood	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Kerosene	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Electricity	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Saw dust/Paddy husk	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Bio gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Not relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households by source of lighting at district level 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: d3aec442e748e54b

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Electricity - from National Grid / from rural electrification project	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Kerosene lamp	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Solar power (grid connected)	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Solar power (stand alone)	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Bio gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Generator	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households using toilet facilities at district level 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 1776b9ac25ff6b34

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Within the unit / Exclusively for the household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Within the unit / Sharing with another household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Outside the unit / Exclusively for the household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Outside the unit / Sharing with another household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / No toilet but sharing with another housing unit/ units	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / Common/ public toilet	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / Not using a toilet	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by housing unit structure at district level and Divisional Secretariat Divisions , 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 512d4139dfc4438e

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary Division	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Single house - Single storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Single house - two storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Single house - more than two storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Attached House - 1st Floor	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Attached House - 2nd Floor	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Attached House - 3rd or 4th Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Attached House - 5th to 10th Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Attached House - 11th to 19th Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Attached House - From 20th Floors or more	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by main material used for walls construction at district level and Divisional Secretariat Divisions , 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 083d1e12fbf4e056

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary Division	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Brick	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Cement block	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Granite/Cube stones	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Cabook	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Pressed soil bricks	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Mud/Warichchi	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Kadjan/ Palmyrah	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Plank/ Metal Sheet/Asbestos	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Zink Aluminium Sheets	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Not Relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by main material used for roof construction at district level and Divisional Secretariat Divisions , 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: e1b26edc2e6a0e5e

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary Division	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Tile	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Asbestos	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Concrete	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Zink Aluminium Sheet	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Metal Sheet	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / cadjan/ Palmyrah/Straw	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Not Relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by main material used for floor construction at district level and Divisional Secretariat Divisions, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 9a5782101a90d9fe

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Cement	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Terrazzo/Tile/Granite/Wood(finished)/Titanium	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Concrete	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Mud	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Wood	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Sand	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Not Relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households by Main Source of EnergyFuel Used for Cooking at district level and Divisional Secretariat Divisions, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: dafbcc0869c20819

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary Division	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Fire wood	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Kerosene	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Electricity	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Saw dust/Paddy husk	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Bio gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Not relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households by main source of drinking water at district level and Divisional Secretariat Divisions, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: ce89abd871f197b0

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary Division	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Protected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Semi Protected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Unprotected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Tube Well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Spring/Fountain	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / National Water Supply &drainage board	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Local Authority	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Community base Organiziation	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Private Water Supply Project	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Tank/River/Streams	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Rain Water	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Bottled water	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / மீள் வடிகட்டல் ஆலை (R.O. Plant) Filter water(R.O.plant)	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Bowser	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households by source of lighting at district level and Divisional Secretariat Divisions , 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: bc8a342569a5c0ac

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary Division	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Electricity - from National Grid / from rural electrification project	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Kerosene lamp	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Solar power (grid connected)	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Solar power (stand alone)	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Bio gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Rural water supply project	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households using toilet facilities at district level and divisional Secretariat Divisions, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 2dbde244619e1052

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary Division	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Within the unit / Exclusively for the household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Within the unit / Sharing with another household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Outside the unit / Exclusively for the household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Outside the unit / Sharing with another household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / No toilet but sharing with another housing unit/ units	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / Common/ public toilet	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / Not using a toilet	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

5. Documents and images

Your institution has its own document and image library. Use the same library for reports, photos and other evidence.

Open this screen for District Secretariats See the presentation example

District Secretariats Documents and images prototype screen — District Secretariats. Prototype screen. Select the image to enlarge it.

What you can try

Open Documents and images. Check the institution name.
Use All files, Documents or Images to find a file. Open its preview or download the original.
Use a sample file to try Add file. Private is the starting choice. Public needs a source, permission to share and review.
Use Access preview to try the institution reviewer and Public visitor views.

Files added in the prototype stay in this browser. Public sharing is an access preview. Existing public reference links already work online.

What your institution needs to confirm

Does a separate library for your institution meet your needs?Should new files start as Private for the permitted institution team?Should Public access require a review of the file and sharing permission?What documents and images will you store? Give the file types, usual sizes and need for earlier versions.Which job roles may add files, read Private files and approve Public files?Which files must stay Private? What permission, licence or expiry rule is needed for Public files?What else should change in this library?

6. Data structure management

Data structure keeps the existing source tree, records, charts and map. Manage structure adds a place to propose changes to definitions.

Open this screen for District Secretariats See the presentation example

District Secretariats Data structure management prototype screen — District Secretariats. Prototype screen. Select the image to enlarge it.

What you can try

Open Data structure and choose Manage structure.
Use Add base domain for a main information area. Add inside creates a subject area, a nested subject, an entity type or a field under the right parent.
Give the definition a clear name, code and meaning. Reuse an existing definition when the meaning is the same.
For a field, check the data type, unit, required value, limits and missing-value rule. Save a Draft, then try the separate reviewer view.

An entity type means a kind of thing or event, such as a reservoir or an inspection. Drafts stay in this browser. A demo approval does not change real definitions, data, chart links or sharing rights.

What your institution needs to confirm

Do the existing main topics and subject areas match your institution’s work?Should definition changes stay Draft until the responsible reviewer checks them?Is it right to reuse the same entity type or field when its meaning is the same?Which main topics, subject areas, entity types or fields should we add or change?Which units, choices, limits, decimal places and missing-value rules must each new field use?Which job roles may edit definitions and review them? Who owns each main information area?When a meaning, unit or calculation changes, what review and version history does your institution need?

7. Users and access

User management shows example profiles for each institution. People and Roles and access let you review the proposed account screens.

Open this screen for District Secretariats See the presentation example

District Secretariats Users and access prototype screen — District Secretariats. Prototype screen. Select the image to enlarge it.

What you can try

Open User management and choose the institution. The rows are examples, not a list of your staff.
Use View access to check a role. An administrator title alone does not give access to Private files.
Try Preview invitation or Preview access change. Check the role, start date, optional end date and reason.
Review the example permissions and tell us which job roles should receive each one.

These are interface previews only. They create no account, send no email and change no access. Use example details in the preview. Institution verification does not grant a real permission.

What your institution needs to confirm

Do the proposed role names and responsibilities match your institution?Should access be limited to the assigned institution and the agreed dates?Should reading Private files need a separate permission, even for an administrator?Which job roles should view data, add files, review Public requests, edit definitions and manage users?Who should approve new access, set an end date or remove access when someone changes duties?Which user fields, roles or access checks are missing? Give role names rather than passwords or private account details.

9. Anything else we should change?

Which decisions or services are missing?Which forms or fields should change? Give the existing form reference where possible.What should change in the entry, checking, expert, map or report steps?Are the English, Sinhala and Tamil words clear? Give the screen name, current word and your suggested wording.Who should join the next review and what should happen next?

Use the Download answers button at the top of this page. Share the downloaded file or printed copy through your agreed review channel. Nothing is sent automatically.

District Secretariats

1. Check a decision

2. Try the inputs

3. Check each decision

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

4. Existing data forms for your institution

5. Documents and images

What you can try

What your institution needs to confirm

6. Data structure management

What you can try

What your institution needs to confirm

7. Users and access

What you can try

What your institution needs to confirm

8. Can you share data regularly?

9. Anything else we should change?