Plantation Workers/Community Groups

Tell us what to change or add.

Your name (optional)Your roleReview date

Continue a saved review

1. Check a decision

Open a decision below. Check the area, period, inputs, result and proposed next step.

2. Try the inputs

Use Example input to change a sample. Use Source input to check the fields and source details. The land-use change decision has its own comparison views.

Record your corrections below, then download your answers or print them.

3. Check each decision

1. Find worker groups missing agreed services 2. Escalate unresolved worker and community issues 3. Review overlapping assistance without exposing private identities 4. Find programmes lacking baseline and follow-up evidence 5. Refer documented water-quality concerns to qualified services 6. Choose what to handle first: community sanitation improvements 7. Refer unsafe housing observations for qualified assessment 8. Address gaps in access to appropriate childcare services 9. Follow up access to qualified health services 10. Select training topics aligned with livelihood needs 11. Compare feasible supplementary livelihood options 12. Refer documented occupational safety concerns 13. Compare travel barriers to essential community services 14. Find residents missing agreed preparedness arrangements 15. Ensure affected workers can respond to development proposals 16. Choose what to handle first: repair referrals for shared facilities 17. Prepare evidence for authorized community-support decisions 18. Compare and correct differences in approved group contributions and expenditure 19. Improve delivery of agreed community information 20. Determine safe sharing of sensitive community case information

1. Find worker groups missing agreed servicesDEC-DP35-001 · Training and services · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Identify worker groups missing agreed services.

Validation required

Method. 100 × distinct covered eligible units / eligible frame. Known uncovered = frame − covered − unknown.

Next step. Review evidence. Select eligible underserved units for outreach, investigate missing coverage, or revise the verified frame.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Required eligible frame [households]; Distinct members of that frame covered [households]; Frame members with unknown coverage [households]

Other required evidence. Eligible group frame; consented needs; training; services delivered; estate; dates.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — training and services · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Required eligible frame	100	households
Distinct members of that frame covered	65	households
Frame members with unknown coverage	5	households
Verified coverage	65	%
Known uncovered	30	households
Unknown coverage	5	households

Count each eligible unit once for the selected service and period. Received messages, attendance, adoption and outcomes are separate measures.

Proposed checking role. Community representative, service specialist and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Verified eligible units receiving service and remaining unmet need.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Plantation Human Development Trust — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

2. Escalate unresolved worker and community issuesDEC-DP35-002 · Issue follow-up · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Escalate unresolved worker and community issues.

Validation required

Method. Open age = assessment date − received date. Days past due = max(0, assessment date − recorded due date) for open cases. Show documented critical conditions separately.

Next step. Follow up overdue case. Assign the next permitted case, escalate an overdue case, request evidence, or close with proof.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Received or defect observed; Recorded due date; Assessment date; Case/work closed; Documented critical unresolved condition; Responsible office or maintainer; Actual closure date when closed

Other required evidence. Confidential case; receipt; response; due date; responsible body; escalation.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — issue follow-up · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Received or defect observed	2025-04-01
Recorded due date	2025-06-01
Assessment date	2025-06-30
Case/work closed	No
Documented critical unresolved condition	Unknown
Responsible office or maintainer	Proposed responsible office
Actual closure date when closed
Open days past due	29	days
Calendar age	90	days

Example due dates are not legal service standards. Do not alter statutory deadlines by silently subtracting pauses, or infer severity from age alone.

Proposed checking role. Community representative, service specialist and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Response time, aged cases, completion and reopened cases.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Plantation Human Development Trust — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

3. Review overlapping assistance without exposing private identitiesDEC-DP35-003 · Programme overlap · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Review overlapping assistance without exposing private identities.

Validation required

Method. Compare the same permitted entity, purpose and qualifying unit. Intersect dated support intervals; overlapping support is a review flag, not proof of duplicate entitlement.

Next step. Review possible overlap. Resolve duplicate identity or overlapping support and decide permitted complementary assistance.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Permitted recipient/service reference; Support purpose; Earlier support period begins; Earlier support period ends; Other support period begins; Other support period ends; Same purpose and qualifying unit

Other required evidence. Consented participant identifiers; support purpose; programme; period; eligibility.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — programme overlap · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Permitted recipient/service reference	Laggala Pallegama — programme overlap
Support purpose	Sample seasonal input support
Earlier support period begins	2025-01-01
Earlier support period ends	2025-06-30
Other support period begins	2025-05-01
Other support period ends	2025-08-31
Same purpose and qualifying unit	Yes
Overlapping days	61	days

Proposed checking role. Community representative, service specialist and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Confirmed unique support and unresolved overlap cases.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Plantation Human Development Trust — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

4. Find programmes lacking baseline and follow-up evidenceDEC-DP35-004 · Verified outcomes · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Identify programmes lacking baseline and follow-up evidence.

Validation required

Method. Check whether the question has a defined outcome, appropriate study design, comparison, baseline/follow-up, sampling, confounding and attrition evidence. Do not manufacture an effect estimate from missing design information.

Next step. Complete the evidence. Continue, adapt, expand or stop a programme based on defensible outcome evidence.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Programme cohort; Programme cohort evidence reference; baseline outcome; baseline outcome evidence reference; follow-up; follow-up evidence reference; verification; verification evidence reference; attrition; attrition evidence reference; context; context evidence reference

Other required evidence. Programme cohort; baseline outcome; follow-up; verification; attrition; context.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — verified outcomes · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Programme cohort	Missing
Programme cohort evidence reference
baseline outcome	Documented
baseline outcome evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
follow-up	Documented
follow-up evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
verification	Documented
verification evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
attrition	Documented
attrition evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
context	Documented
context evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
Study evidence gaps	1	items

The arithmetic alone does not establish causation. Design, parallel trends, confounding, attrition, uncertainty and adverse effects need appropriate evidence.

Proposed checking role. Community representative, service specialist and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Verified outcomes, costs, distributional effects and evidence strength.

World Bank Impact Evaluation in Practice Second Edition — Institution publication. Chapter7 difference-in-differences. Published difference-in-differences estimator and study assumptions; aggregate examples do not establish causation.
SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Plantation Human Development Trust — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

5. Refer documented water-quality concerns to qualified servicesDEC-DP35-005 · Drinking water · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Refer documented water-quality concerns to qualified services.

Validation required

Method. Compare the measured value only with matching parameter, unit, use and averaging period. Retain limit source/version and censored-result status.

Next step. Outside example comparison bounds. Refer a confirmed nonconformance for authorized response, resample, or investigate the method.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Parameter and applicable use; Measured result [NTU]; Example lower comparison bound [NTU]; Example upper comparison bound [NTU]; Original and limit unit; Sampling and analytical method/version; Limit source, version and use; Parameter, unit, use and averaging period match; Result is below a reporting/detection limit; Averaging interval, sampling depth or process basis

Other required evidence. Sample evidence; parameter; laboratory method; applicable limit; supply location.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — drinking water · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Parameter and applicable use	Supply-water turbidity
Measured result	1.4	NTU
Example lower comparison bound	0	NTU
Example upper comparison bound	1	NTU
Original and limit unit	NTU
Sampling and analytical method/version	Sample laboratory method
Limit source, version and use	Fictional comparison bounds; not a regulatory limit
Parameter, unit, use and averaging period match	Yes
Result is below a reporting/detection limit	No
Averaging interval, sampling depth or process basis	Sample stated sampling/averaging basis
Measured value	1.4	NTU

Example bounds establish no compliance or diagnosis. Ambient, drinking-water, effluent, crop, food, air and noise standards are not interchangeable. A censored result is not an exact zero.

Proposed checking role. Community representative, service specialist and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Follow-up compliance, exposure/service condition and corrective closure.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Plantation Human Development Trust — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

6. Choose what to handle first: community sanitation improvementsDEC-DP35-006 · Sanitation · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Prioritize community sanitation improvements.

Validation required

Method. 100 × distinct covered eligible units / eligible frame. Known uncovered = frame − covered − unknown.

Next step. Review evidence. Select eligible underserved units for outreach, investigate missing coverage, or revise the verified frame.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Required eligible frame [households]; Distinct members of that frame covered [households]; Frame members with unknown coverage [households]

Other required evidence. Household frame; usable facilities; accessibility; condition; verified needs.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — sanitation · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Required eligible frame	100	households
Distinct members of that frame covered	65	households
Frame members with unknown coverage	5	households
Verified coverage	65	%
Known uncovered	30	households
Unknown coverage	5	households

Count each eligible unit once for the selected service and period. Received messages, attendance, adoption and outcomes are separate measures.

Proposed checking role. Community representative, service specialist and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Verified eligible units receiving service and remaining unmet need.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Plantation Human Development Trust — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

7. Refer unsafe housing observations for qualified assessmentDEC-DP35-007 · Housing safety · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Refer unsafe housing observations for qualified assessment.

Validation required

Method. Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.

Next step. Complete the evidence. Select a feasible control, escalate beyond authority, or seek technical inspection.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Building condition; Building condition evidence reference; occupancy; occupancy evidence reference; hazards; hazards evidence reference; inspection evidence; inspection evidence evidence reference; referral authority; referral authority evidence reference; Documented unresolved critical condition; Evidence observation date; Existing control and its evidence; Competent recipient

Other required evidence. Building condition; occupancy; hazards; inspection evidence; referral authority.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — housing safety · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Building condition	Missing
Building condition evidence reference
occupancy	Documented
occupancy evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
hazards	Documented
hazards evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
inspection evidence	Documented
inspection evidence evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
referral authority	Documented
referral authority evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
Documented unresolved critical condition	Unknown
Evidence observation date	2025-06-30
Existing control and its evidence	Sample documented control
Competent recipient	Responsible specialist / duty authority
Evidence gaps	1	items

Show the hazard, exposure and verified controls separately. No generic score, probability, diagnosis, site clearance or official warning is derived from a count.

Proposed checking role. Community representative, service specialist and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Verified control effectiveness and residual risk with evidence.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Plantation Human Development Trust — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

8. Address gaps in access to appropriate childcare servicesDEC-DP35-008 · Childcare access · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Address gaps in access to appropriate childcare services.

Validation required

Method. Usable capacity = rated capacity − documented unavailable capacity. Surplus/shortfall = usable − matching demand.

Next step. Review capacity shortfall. Redistribute usable resources, propose expansion, or manage demand within authorized limits.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Demand in the selected period [childcare places]; Rated capacity for that period [childcare places]; Unavailable or restricted capacity [childcare places]

Other required evidence. Consented demand; usable centre capacity; trained staff; access; service hours.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — childcare access · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Demand in the selected period	150	childcare places
Rated capacity for that period	180	childcare places
Unavailable or restricted capacity	45	childcare places
Usable capacity minus demand	-15	childcare places
Usable capacity	135	childcare places

Match peak/average basis, time window, skill, staffing, accessibility and other binding constraints. One aggregate capacity does not override a safety constraint.

Proposed checking role. Community representative, service specialist and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Actual usable capacity, unmet demand and service quality.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Plantation Human Development Trust — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

9. Follow up access to qualified health servicesDEC-DP35-009 · Health referrals · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Follow up access to qualified health services.

Validation required

Method. 100 × verified completed members / original unique cohort. Keep unknown follow-up separate; stages are nested, not independent populations.

Next step. Review evidence. Address stage bottlenecks, follow up dropouts, or revise service delivery.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Unique original cohort entrants [cases]; Entrants reviewed [cases]; Entrants with verified completion [cases]; Entrants with unknown follow-up [cases]

Other required evidence. Consented referral; receiving service; appointment; access barrier; follow-up status.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — health referrals · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Unique original cohort entrants	180	cases
Entrants reviewed	132	cases
Entrants with verified completion	96	cases
Entrants with unknown follow-up	12	cases
Verified completion share	53.333	%
Not verified complete	84	cases

Attendance, receipt, adoption, delivered service and outcomes are distinct stages. Repeated visits must not become new people.

Proposed checking role. Community representative, service specialist and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Verified progression, waiting times and outcomes for the same cohort.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Plantation Human Development Trust — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

10. Select training topics aligned with livelihood needsDEC-DP35-010 · Skills development · Suggested priority: Medium

Try this decision

Select training topics aligned with livelihood needs.

Validation required

Method. Budget minus option cost. Compare benefits, adverse effects and mandatory constraints separately; no weighted score or automatic best option.

Next step. Compare feasible trade-offs. Choose a feasible alternative with rationale and conditions, commission evidence, or defer.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Option cost [LKR]; Available budget [LKR]; Mandatory constraints; Expected benefit and its evidence; Resource needs and adverse effects

Other required evidence. Needs assessment; course options; costs; access; participant preferences; outcomes.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Water-service repair · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Option cost	1,500,000	LKR
Available budget	1,800,000	LKR
Mandatory constraints	Met
Expected benefit and its evidence	Select training topics aligned with livelihood needs; Needs assessment and course options evidence needed
Resource needs and adverse effects	Sample water, labour, access and safeguard trade-offs
Budget remaining after option	300,000	LKR

Affordability does not prove feasibility or scientific suitability. A missing mandatory condition keeps an option unresolved.

Proposed checking role. Community representative, service specialist and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Verified benefits, costs and adverse effects versus the agreed baseline.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Plantation Human Development Trust — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

11. Compare feasible supplementary livelihood optionsDEC-DP35-011 · Livelihood alternatives · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Compare feasible supplementary livelihood options.

Validation required

Method. Budget minus option cost. Compare benefits, adverse effects and mandatory constraints separately; no weighted score or automatic best option.

Next step. Compare feasible trade-offs. Choose a feasible alternative with rationale and conditions, commission evidence, or defer.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Option cost [LKR]; Available budget [LKR]; Mandatory constraints; Expected benefit and its evidence; Resource needs and adverse effects

Other required evidence. Skills; resources; market demand; costs; care responsibilities; risks.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Water-service repair · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Option cost	1,500,000	LKR
Available budget	1,800,000	LKR
Mandatory constraints	Met
Expected benefit and its evidence	Compare feasible supplementary livelihood options; Skills and resources evidence needed
Resource needs and adverse effects	Sample water, labour, access and safeguard trade-offs
Budget remaining after option	300,000	LKR

Affordability does not prove feasibility or scientific suitability. A missing mandatory condition keeps an option unresolved.

Proposed checking role. Community representative, service specialist and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Verified benefits, costs and adverse effects versus the agreed baseline.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Plantation Human Development Trust — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

12. Refer documented occupational safety concernsDEC-DP35-012 · Workplace concerns · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Refer documented occupational safety concerns.

Validation required

Method. Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.

Next step. Complete the evidence. Select a feasible control, escalate beyond authority, or seek technical inspection.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Task hazard; Task hazard evidence reference; incident evidence; incident evidence evidence reference; current controls; current controls evidence reference; worker concerns; worker concerns evidence reference; competent recipient; competent recipient evidence reference; Documented unresolved critical condition; Evidence observation date; Existing control and its evidence; Competent recipient

Other required evidence. Task hazard; incident evidence; current controls; worker concerns; competent recipient.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — workplace concerns · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Task hazard	Missing
Task hazard evidence reference
incident evidence	Documented
incident evidence evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
current controls	Documented
current controls evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
worker concerns	Documented
worker concerns evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
competent recipient	Documented
competent recipient evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
Documented unresolved critical condition	Unknown
Evidence observation date	2025-06-30
Existing control and its evidence	Sample documented control
Competent recipient	Responsible specialist / duty authority
Evidence gaps	1	items

Show the hazard, exposure and verified controls separately. No generic score, probability, diagnosis, site clearance or official warning is derived from a count.

Proposed checking role. Community representative, service specialist and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Verified control effectiveness and residual risk with evidence.

ILO controlling occupational risks — Institution publication. Controlling risks; hierarchy of controls. Evidence-led control review; no universal numeric risk score or clearance.
SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Plantation Human Development Trust — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

13. Compare travel barriers to essential community servicesDEC-DP35-013 · Service accessibility · Suggested priority: Medium

Try this decision

Compare travel barriers to essential community services.

Validation required

Method. Compare supplied route times/distances, usable capacity and documented access/window constraints. Display feasible candidates; no route optimization is implied.

Next step. Resolve access/capacity evidence. Choose a permitted feasible route, postpone, or request updated access evidence.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Verified route distance [km]; Estimated route travel time [minutes]; Usable vehicle/team capacity [units]; Required capacity [units]; Access, closures and operating conditions; Operating and service window

Other required evidence. Community locations; service sites; accessible transport; travel time; service hours.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — service accessibility · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Verified route distance	24	km
Estimated route travel time	65	minutes
Usable vehicle/team capacity	18	units
Required capacity	15	units
Access, closures and operating conditions	Unresolved
Operating and service window	Sample operating window
Estimated travel time	65	minutes
Capacity minus demand	3	units

Straight-line distance is not a road route. Example routes establish no current road status, emergency clearance or safe evacuation instruction.

Proposed checking role. Community representative, service specialist and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Verified travel time, deliveries and unresolved access needs.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Plantation Human Development Trust — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

14. Find residents missing agreed preparedness arrangementsDEC-DP35-014 · Disaster preparedness · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Identify residents missing agreed preparedness arrangements.

Validation required

Method. 100 × distinct covered eligible units / eligible frame. Known uncovered = frame − covered − unknown.

Next step. Review evidence. Select eligible underserved units for outreach, investigate missing coverage, or revise the verified frame.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Required eligible frame [households]; Distinct members of that frame covered [households]; Frame members with unknown coverage [households]

Other required evidence. Hazard exposure; accessible warnings; safe sites; assistance needs; consent.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — disaster preparedness · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Required eligible frame	100	households
Distinct members of that frame covered	65	households
Frame members with unknown coverage	5	households
Verified coverage	65	%
Known uncovered	30	households
Unknown coverage	5	households

Count each eligible unit once for the selected service and period. Received messages, attendance, adoption and outcomes are separate measures.

Proposed checking role. Community representative, service specialist and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Verified eligible units receiving service and remaining unmet need.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Plantation Human Development Trust — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

15. Ensure affected workers can respond to development proposalsDEC-DP35-015 · Participation · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Ensure affected workers can respond to development proposals.

Validation required

Method. 100 × distinct respondents / invited people. Record unresolved issues individually; one respondent may raise several issues.

Next step. Resolve participation barriers and issues. Address concerns, revise the proposal, seek required responses, or escalate unresolved conditions.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Distinct relevant people invited [people]; People who responded [people]; Unresolved issues [issues]; Proposal/version being discussed; Required participation channels accessible

Other required evidence. Proposal; participant frame; accessible consultation; responses; objections; resolution.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — participation · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Distinct relevant people invited	95	people
People who responded	68	people
Unresolved issues	16	issues
Proposal/version being discussed	Sample proposal1
Required participation channels accessible	Unknown
Response share	71.579	%
Unresolved issues	16	issues

Response, attendance and silence are not consent. Participation does not transfer decision authority or settle rights.

Proposed checking role. Community representative, service specialist and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Resolved concerns, participation and compliance with recorded commitments.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Plantation Human Development Trust — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

16. Choose what to handle first: repair referrals for shared facilitiesDEC-DP35-016 · Community facilities · Suggested priority: Medium

Try this decision

Prioritize repair referrals for shared facilities.

Validation required

Method. Open age = assessment date − received date. Days past due = max(0, assessment date − recorded due date) for open cases. Show documented critical conditions separately.

Next step. Follow up overdue case. Authorize feasible repair through the proper work process, inspect further, or restrict unsafe use.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Other required evidence. Facility; condition; users affected; maintenance owner; defects; repair options.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — community facilities · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Received or defect observed	2025-04-01
Recorded due date	2025-06-01
Assessment date	2025-06-30
Case/work closed	No
Documented critical unresolved condition	Unknown
Responsible office or maintainer	Proposed responsible office
Actual closure date when closed
Open days past due	29	days
Calendar age	90	days

Example due dates are not legal service standards. Do not alter statutory deadlines by silently subtracting pauses, or infer severity from age alone.

Proposed checking role. Community representative, service specialist and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Verified defect closure, service availability and repeat failures.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Plantation Human Development Trust — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

17. Prepare evidence for authorized community-support decisionsDEC-DP35-017 · Support eligibility · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Prepare evidence for authorized community-support decisions.

Validation required

Method. Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.

Next step. Complete the evidence. Submit a recommendation to the appointed authority, request evidence, or record an appeal.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Scheme; Scheme evidence reference; applicant evidence; applicant evidence evidence reference; requirements; requirements evidence reference; prior support; prior support evidence reference; consent; consent evidence reference; referral; referral evidence reference

Other required evidence. Scheme; applicant evidence; requirements; prior support; consent; referral.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — support eligibility · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Scheme	Missing
Scheme evidence reference
applicant evidence	Documented
applicant evidence evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
requirements	Documented
requirements evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
prior support	Documented
prior support evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
consent	Documented
consent evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
referral	Documented
referral evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
Evidence gaps	1	items

Evidence completeness alone cannot establish suitability, eligibility, safety, permission or method validity.

Proposed checking role. Community representative, service specialist and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Documented determinations, processing time and appeal outcomes.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Plantation Human Development Trust — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

18. Compare and correct differences in approved group contributions and expenditureDEC-DP35-018 · Community funds · Suggested priority: Medium

Try this decision

Reconcile approved group contributions and expenditure.

Validation required

Method. Opening + receipts/additions − payments/reductions − other documented adjustments. Compare with independently recorded closing. A negative cash scenario is a shortfall, not an invalid water volume.

Next step. Reconcile closing balance. Investigate unexplained balances and propose revised measurement or operating action.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Opening cash/receivable balance [LKR]; Receipts and documented additions [LKR]; Payments and documented reductions [LKR]; Other documented non-overlapping adjustments [LKR]; Independently recorded closing balance [LKR]

Other required evidence. Opening funds; contributions; authorized spending; receipts; closing balance.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — community funds · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Opening cash/receivable balance	160,000	LKR
Receipts and documented additions	48,000	LKR
Payments and documented reductions	35,000	LKR
Other documented non-overlapping adjustments	9,000	LKR
Independently recorded closing balance	163,500	LKR
Calculated closing balance	164,000	LKR
Recorded minus calculated closing	-500	LKR

Use the same physical boundary, period and units. A residual is a reconciliation issue, not automatically a measured loss.

Proposed checking role. Community representative, service specialist and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Reconciled balance residuals and verified operating results.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Plantation Human Development Trust — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

19. Improve delivery of agreed community informationDEC-DP35-019 · Communication · Suggested priority: Lower

Try this decision

Improve delivery of agreed community information.

Validation required

Method. 100 × distinct covered eligible units / eligible frame. Known uncovered = frame − covered − unknown.

Next step. Review evidence. Select eligible underserved units for outreach, investigate missing coverage, or revise the verified frame.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Required eligible frame [households]; Distinct members of that frame covered [households]; Frame members with unknown coverage [households]

Other required evidence. Audience frame; language; preferred channel; delivery; acknowledgement; date.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — communication · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Required eligible frame	100	households
Distinct members of that frame covered	65	households
Frame members with unknown coverage	5	households
Verified coverage	65	%
Known uncovered	30	households
Unknown coverage	5	households

Count each eligible unit once for the selected service and period. Received messages, attendance, adoption and outcomes are separate measures.

Proposed checking role. Community representative, service specialist and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Verified eligible units receiving service and remaining unmet need.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Plantation Human Development Trust — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

20. Determine safe sharing of sensitive community case informationDEC-DP35-020 · Privacy and safeguarding · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Determine safe sharing of sensitive community case information.

Validation required

Method. Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.

Next step. Complete the evidence. Grant only scoped authorized access, aggregate/redact, refuse, or request approval.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Purpose; Purpose evidence reference; consent or lawful basis; consent or lawful basis evidence reference; required fields; required fields evidence reference; recipient; recipient evidence reference; classification; classification evidence reference; approval; approval evidence reference

Other required evidence. Purpose; consent or lawful basis; required fields; recipient; classification; approval.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — privacy and safeguarding · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Purpose	Missing
Purpose evidence reference
consent or lawful basis	Documented
consent or lawful basis evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
required fields	Documented
required fields evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
recipient	Documented
recipient evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
classification	Documented
classification evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
approval	Documented
approval evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
Evidence gaps	1	items

Evidence completeness alone cannot establish suitability, eligibility, safety, permission or method validity.

Proposed checking role. Community representative, service specialist and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Permitted use, expiry compliance and investigated disclosure incidents.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Plantation Human Development Trust — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

4. Existing data forms for your institution

Check which existing source fields can supply the decision inputs.

Occupied Housing Units by Grama Niladhari Division · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 8372d13713031913

Field	Unit	Required
Province Code	Confirm if needed	No
Province Name	Confirm if needed	No
District Code	Confirm if needed	No
District Name	Confirm if needed	No
DS_Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
DS_Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Number	Confirm if needed	No
Occupied Housing Units	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Information on Occupied Housing Units by Grama Niladhari Division, CPH-2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: e7e1c2657503020f

Field	Unit	Required
Province Code	Confirm if needed	No
Province Name	Confirm if needed	No
District Code	Confirm if needed	No
District Name	Confirm if needed	No
DS_Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
DS_Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Number	Confirm if needed	No
Occupied Housing Units	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Single house - single storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Single house - two storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Single house - more than two storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Attached house - 1st Floor	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Attached house - 2nd Floor	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Attached house - From 3 to 4 Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Attached house - From 5 to 10 Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Attached house - From 11to 19 Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Attached house - From 20 Floors or more	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Bricks	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Cement block	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Granite/ Cube stones	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Cabook	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Pressed soil bricks	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Warichchi / Mud	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Cadjan/ Palmyrah	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Planks/ Metal Sheets/ Asbestos	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Zink Aluminium Sheets	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Other (specify)	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Not relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Cement	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Terrazzo/Tile/Granite/Wood (Finished)	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Concrete	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Mud	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Wood	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Sand	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Other (specify)	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Not relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Tile	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Asbestos	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Concrete	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Zink Aluminium Sheet	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Metal Sheet	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Cadjan/ Palmyrah/ Straw	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Other (specify)	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Not relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Household Information by Grama Niladhari Division, CPH-2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: da744a0cfc8f5c9f

Field	Unit	Required
Province Code	Confirm if needed	No
Province Name	Confirm if needed	No
District Code	Confirm if needed	No
District Name	Confirm if needed	No
DS_Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
DS_Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Number	Confirm if needed	No
Number of Households	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Ground Water / Protected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Ground Water / Semi protected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Ground Water / Unprotected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Ground Water / Tube well	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Ground Water / Spring/ Fountain	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Pipe borne water - National water supply & drainage board	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Pipe borne water - Local Authority	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Pipe borne water - Community base organiziation	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Pipe borne water - Private water supply project	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Other / Tank/ River/Streams	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Other / Rain water	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Other / Bottled water	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Other / Filter water (R.O. Plant)	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Other / Bowser	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Other / Other (specify)	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Fire wood	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Kerosene	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Electricity	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Saw dust/Paddy husk	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Bio gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Other (Specify bellow )	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Not relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of Lighting / Electricity - from National grid/rural hydro power project	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of Lighting / Kerosene lamp	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of Lighting / Solar power (grid connected)	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of Lighting / Solar power (stand alone)	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of Lighting / Bio gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of Lighting / Generator	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of Lighting / Other (Specify bellow )	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Within the unit / Within the housing unit - Exclusively for the household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Within the unit / Within the housing unit - Sharing with another household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Outside the unit / Within Premises - Exclusively for the household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Outside the unit / Within Premises - Sharing with another household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / No toilet but sharing with another housing unit/units	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / Common/ Public toilet	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / Not using a toilet (use jungle, beach and open ground)	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

GN Level Population by Sector, CPH 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: a96d28bdb2a7a507

Field	Unit	Required
District Code	Confirm if needed	No
District Name	Confirm if needed	No
DSD Code	Confirm if needed	No
DSD Name	persons	No
GND Code	Confirm if needed	No
GND Name	persons	No
Sector / Total	persons	No
Sector / Urban*	persons	No
Sector / Rural	persons	No
Sector / Estate Rural**	persons	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by housing unit structure at district level 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: a2103035c8ce0bac

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Single house - Single storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Single house - Two storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Single house - more than two storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Attached House - 1st Floor	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Attached House - 2nd Floor	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Attached House - 3rd or 4th Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Attached House - 5th to 10th Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Attached House - 11th to 19th Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Attached House - From 20th Floors or more	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by main material used for walls construction at district level, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 41eb1069e9c9c17d

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Brick	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Cement block	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Granite/Cube stones	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Cabook	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Pressed soil bricks	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Mud/Warichchi	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Kadjan/ Palmyrah	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Plank/ Metal Sheet/Asbestos	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Zink Aluminium Sheets	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Not Relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by main material used for roof construction at district level, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 74f863b697ebe277

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Tile	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Asbestos	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Concrete	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Zink Aluminium Sheet	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Metal Sheet	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / cadjan/ Palmyrah/Straw	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Not Relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by main material used for floor construction at district level, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 78b642444e82761a

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Cement	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Terrazzo/Tile/Granite/Wood(finished)/Titanium	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Concrete	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Mud	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Wood	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Sand	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Other	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Not Relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households by main source of drinking water at district level, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: ef0674489fe2bdc3

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Protected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Semi Protected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Unprotected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Tube Well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Spring/Fountain	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / National Water Supply &drainage board	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Local Authority	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Community base Organiziation	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Private Water Supply Project	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Tank/River/Streams	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Rain Water	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Bottled water	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / மீள் வடிகட்டல் ஆலை (R.O. Plant) Filter water(R.O.plant)	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Bowser	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households by Main Source of EnergyFuel Used for Cooking at District, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 018e27b1cfd72a36

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Fire wood	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Kerosene	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Electricity	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Saw dust/Paddy husk	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Bio gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Not relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households by source of lighting at district level 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: d3aec442e748e54b

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Electricity - from National Grid / from rural electrification project	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Kerosene lamp	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Solar power (grid connected)	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Solar power (stand alone)	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Bio gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Generator	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households using toilet facilities at district level 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 1776b9ac25ff6b34

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Within the unit / Exclusively for the household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Within the unit / Sharing with another household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Outside the unit / Exclusively for the household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Outside the unit / Sharing with another household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / No toilet but sharing with another housing unit/ units	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / Common/ public toilet	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / Not using a toilet	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by housing unit structure at district level and Divisional Secretariat Divisions , 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 512d4139dfc4438e

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary Division	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Single house - Single storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Single house - two storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Single house - more than two storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Attached House - 1st Floor	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Attached House - 2nd Floor	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Attached House - 3rd or 4th Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Attached House - 5th to 10th Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Attached House - 11th to 19th Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Attached House - From 20th Floors or more	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by main material used for walls construction at district level and Divisional Secretariat Divisions , 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 083d1e12fbf4e056

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary Division	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Brick	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Cement block	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Granite/Cube stones	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Cabook	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Pressed soil bricks	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Mud/Warichchi	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Kadjan/ Palmyrah	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Plank/ Metal Sheet/Asbestos	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Zink Aluminium Sheets	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Not Relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by main material used for roof construction at district level and Divisional Secretariat Divisions , 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: e1b26edc2e6a0e5e

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary Division	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Tile	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Asbestos	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Concrete	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Zink Aluminium Sheet	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Metal Sheet	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / cadjan/ Palmyrah/Straw	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Not Relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by main material used for floor construction at district level and Divisional Secretariat Divisions, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 9a5782101a90d9fe

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Cement	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Terrazzo/Tile/Granite/Wood(finished)/Titanium	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Concrete	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Mud	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Wood	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Sand	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Not Relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households by Main Source of EnergyFuel Used for Cooking at district level and Divisional Secretariat Divisions, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: dafbcc0869c20819

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary Division	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Fire wood	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Kerosene	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Electricity	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Saw dust/Paddy husk	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Bio gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Not relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households by main source of drinking water at district level and Divisional Secretariat Divisions, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: ce89abd871f197b0

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary Division	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Protected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Semi Protected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Unprotected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Tube Well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Spring/Fountain	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / National Water Supply &drainage board	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Local Authority	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Community base Organiziation	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Private Water Supply Project	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Tank/River/Streams	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Rain Water	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Bottled water	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / மீள் வடிகட்டல் ஆலை (R.O. Plant) Filter water(R.O.plant)	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Bowser	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households by source of lighting at district level and Divisional Secretariat Divisions , 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: bc8a342569a5c0ac

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary Division	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Electricity - from National Grid / from rural electrification project	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Kerosene lamp	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Solar power (grid connected)	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Solar power (stand alone)	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Bio gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Rural water supply project	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households using toilet facilities at district level and divisional Secretariat Divisions, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 2dbde244619e1052

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary Division	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Within the unit / Exclusively for the household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Within the unit / Sharing with another household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Outside the unit / Exclusively for the household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Outside the unit / Sharing with another household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / No toilet but sharing with another housing unit/ units	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / Common/ public toilet	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / Not using a toilet	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

FP124 financing · Programme Delivery

Existing form reference: e6af681e07c8efdc

Field	Unit	Required
Funding item	Confirm if needed	No
Instrument	Confirm if needed	No
Amount	USD	No
Currency	Confirm if needed	No
Date	Confirm if needed	No
Basis	Confirm if needed	No

5. Documents and images

Your institution has its own document and image library. Use the same library for reports, photos and other evidence.

Open this screen for Plantation Workers/Community Groups See the presentation example

Plantation Workers/Community Groups Documents and images prototype screen — Plantation Workers/Community Groups. Prototype screen. Select the image to enlarge it.

What you can try

Open Documents and images. Check the institution name.
Use All files, Documents or Images to find a file. Open its preview or download the original.
Use a sample file to try Add file. Private is the starting choice. Public needs a source, permission to share and review.
Use Access preview to try the institution reviewer and Public visitor views.

Files added in the prototype stay in this browser. Public sharing is an access preview. Existing public reference links already work online.

What your institution needs to confirm

Does a separate library for your institution meet your needs?Should new files start as Private for the permitted institution team?Should Public access require a review of the file and sharing permission?What documents and images will you store? Give the file types, usual sizes and need for earlier versions.Which job roles may add files, read Private files and approve Public files?Which files must stay Private? What permission, licence or expiry rule is needed for Public files?What else should change in this library?

6. Data structure management

Data structure keeps the existing source tree, records, charts and map. Manage structure adds a place to propose changes to definitions.

Open this screen for Plantation Workers/Community Groups See the presentation example

Plantation Workers/Community Groups Data structure management prototype screen — Plantation Workers/Community Groups. Prototype screen. Select the image to enlarge it.

What you can try

Open Data structure and choose Manage structure.
Use Add base domain for a main information area. Add inside creates a subject area, a nested subject, an entity type or a field under the right parent.
Give the definition a clear name, code and meaning. Reuse an existing definition when the meaning is the same.
For a field, check the data type, unit, required value, limits and missing-value rule. Save a Draft, then try the separate reviewer view.

An entity type means a kind of thing or event, such as a reservoir or an inspection. Drafts stay in this browser. A demo approval does not change real definitions, data, chart links or sharing rights.

What your institution needs to confirm

Do the existing main topics and subject areas match your institution’s work?Should definition changes stay Draft until the responsible reviewer checks them?Is it right to reuse the same entity type or field when its meaning is the same?Which main topics, subject areas, entity types or fields should we add or change?Which units, choices, limits, decimal places and missing-value rules must each new field use?Which job roles may edit definitions and review them? Who owns each main information area?When a meaning, unit or calculation changes, what review and version history does your institution need?

7. Users and access

User management shows example profiles for each institution. People and Roles and access let you review the proposed account screens.

Open this screen for Plantation Workers/Community Groups See the presentation example

Plantation Workers/Community Groups Users and access prototype screen — Plantation Workers/Community Groups. Prototype screen. Select the image to enlarge it.

What you can try

Open User management and choose the institution. The rows are examples, not a list of your staff.
Use View access to check a role. An administrator title alone does not give access to Private files.
Try Preview invitation or Preview access change. Check the role, start date, optional end date and reason.
Review the example permissions and tell us which job roles should receive each one.

These are interface previews only. They create no account, send no email and change no access. Use example details in the preview. Institution verification does not grant a real permission.

What your institution needs to confirm

Do the proposed role names and responsibilities match your institution?Should access be limited to the assigned institution and the agreed dates?Should reading Private files need a separate permission, even for an administrator?Which job roles should view data, add files, review Public requests, edit definitions and manage users?Who should approve new access, set an end date or remove access when someone changes duties?Which user fields, roles or access checks are missing? Give role names rather than passwords or private account details.

9. Anything else we should change?

Which decisions or services are missing?Which forms or fields should change? Give the existing form reference where possible.What should change in the entry, checking, expert, map or report steps?Are the English, Sinhala and Tamil words clear? Give the screen name, current word and your suggested wording.Who should join the next review and what should happen next?

Use the Download answers button at the top of this page. Share the downloaded file or printed copy through your agreed review channel. Nothing is sent automatically.

Plantation Workers/Community Groups

1. Check a decision

2. Try the inputs

3. Check each decision

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

4. Existing data forms for your institution

5. Documents and images

What you can try

What your institution needs to confirm

6. Data structure management

What you can try

What your institution needs to confirm

7. Users and access

What you can try

What your institution needs to confirm

8. Can you share data regularly?

9. Anything else we should change?