Banks and Finance Institutions

1. Select investments for detailed cash-flow appraisalDEC-DP38-001 · Investment appraisal · Suggested priority: High

Select investments for detailed cash-flow appraisal.

Verified published formula · Discounted cash-flow NPV

Method. NPV = −initial investment + sum of year1…5 net cash flows discounted at the stated annual rate, including residual value once in year5.

Next step. Review evidence. Compare feasible investments, adjust the scope, or defer pending finance/evidence.

Inputs, example and sources

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations · Guidelines for defining financial economic environmental and social information
Institution publication · Sections 2.2.2 and 2.2.3, discounting and Net Present Value

The five-year horizon, discount rate and cash assumptions are local settings. Verification does not approve an investment or loan.

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Initial investment [LKR]; Net cash flow year1 [LKR]; Net cash flow year2 [LKR]; Net cash flow year3 [LKR]; Net cash flow year4 [LKR]; Net cash flow year5 [LKR]; Residual value at end of year5 [LKR]; Example discount rate [%]

Other required evidence. Project cash flows; capital cost; operating costs; benefits; discount rate; scenarios.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — investment appraisal · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Initial investment	2,400,000	LKR
Net cash flow year1	400,000	LKR
Net cash flow year2	550,000	LKR
Net cash flow year3	680,000	LKR
Net cash flow year4	720,000	LKR
Net cash flow year5	760,000	LKR
Residual value at end of year5	120,000	LKR
Example discount rate	8	%
Five-year net present value	109,847.353	LKR

Match currency, price year, real/nominal basis and cash-flow timing. The example rate and five-year horizon are assumptions, not institutional financing terms; no credit approval follows.

Proposed checking role. Authorized credit/risk analyst and environmental/social specialist.

After the action. Realized cash flows, benefits and costs versus the approved appraisal.

FAO Guidelines for financial economic environmental and social information — Institution publication. Section2 discounted cash-flow analysis and NPV. Published discounted cash-flow method; local rate, horizon and cash assumptions are separate.
SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

CBSL sustainable finance — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
CBSL Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy 2022 — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

2. Check debt-service coverage under lender-defined scenariosDEC-DP38-002 · Repayment capacity · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Assess debt-service coverage under lender-defined scenarios.

Validation required

Method. Debt-service coverage = cash available / (principal + interest) for the same period. Zero scheduled debt has no coverage ratio.

Next step. Review evidence. Refer affordability and stress results to credit authority, revise terms, or request more evidence.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Cash available for debt service [LKR]; Scheduled principal for same period [LKR]; Scheduled interest for same period [LKR]; Repayment and cash-flow period

Other required evidence. Cash available for debt service; principal; interest; repayment dates; covenants.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — repayment capacity · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Cash available for debt service	860,000	LKR
Scheduled principal for same period	500,000	LKR
Scheduled interest for same period	120,000	LKR
Repayment and cash-flow period	Sample annual period
Debt-service coverage	1.387	ratio
Cash after scheduled debt service	240,000	LKR

No lender covenant, credit decision, borrower eligibility or legal consequence is inferred. Seasonal repayment timing and downside scenarios remain explicit.

Proposed checking role. Authorized credit/risk analyst and environmental/social specialist.

After the action. Actual debt service, arrears and cash coverage under agreed terms.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

CBSL sustainable finance — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
CBSL Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy 2022 — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

3. Find gaps between required finance and confirmed commitmentsDEC-DP38-003 · Co-financing · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Identify gaps between required finance and confirmed commitments.

Validation required

Method. Unfunded = need − commitments. Undisbursed = commitments − disbursements. Unspent = disbursements − eligible spending.

Next step. Review unfunded need. Resolve funding gaps, release only authorized commitments, or revise the finance plan.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Approved financing need [LKR]; Confirmed commitments [LKR]; Funds actually disbursed [LKR]; Verified eligible expenditure [LKR]

Other required evidence. Project need; borrower equity; grants; debt commitments; disbursements; conditions.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — co-financing · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Approved financing need	3,500,000	LKR
Confirmed commitments	2,650,000	LKR
Funds actually disbursed	1,640,000	LKR
Verified eligible expenditure	1,200,000	LKR
Unfunded need	850,000	LKR
Committed but not disbursed	1,010,000	LKR
Disbursed but not spent	440,000	LKR

Keep commitments, cash receipts, expenditure and verified physical outputs separate. Negative balances flag overcommitment or reconciliation; no automatic accounting adjustment.

Proposed checking role. Authorized credit/risk analyst and environmental/social specialist.

After the action. Verified funding, spend and deliverables reconciled without double counting.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

CBSL sustainable finance — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
CBSL Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy 2022 — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

4. Compare investment viability under reviewed stress assumptionsDEC-DP38-004 · Sensitivity · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Compare investment viability under reviewed stress assumptions.

Verified published formula · Discounted cash-flow NPV

Method. NPV = −initial investment + sum of year1…5 net cash flows discounted at the stated annual rate, including residual value once in year5.

Next step. Review evidence. Compare feasible investments, adjust the scope, or defer pending finance/evidence.

Inputs, example and sources

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations · Guidelines for defining financial economic environmental and social information
Institution publication · Sections 2.2.2 and 2.2.3, discounting and Net Present Value

The five-year horizon, discount rate and cash assumptions are local settings. Verification does not approve an investment or loan.

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Initial investment [LKR]; Net cash flow year1 [LKR]; Net cash flow year2 [LKR]; Net cash flow year3 [LKR]; Net cash flow year4 [LKR]; Net cash flow year5 [LKR]; Residual value at end of year5 [LKR]; Example discount rate [%]

Other required evidence. Cash-flow alternatives; yield; prices; costs; delays; discount rate.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — sensitivity · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Initial investment	2,400,000	LKR
Net cash flow year1	400,000	LKR
Net cash flow year2	550,000	LKR
Net cash flow year3	680,000	LKR
Net cash flow year4	720,000	LKR
Net cash flow year5	760,000	LKR
Residual value at end of year5	120,000	LKR
Example discount rate	8	%
Five-year net present value	109,847.353	LKR

Match currency, price year, real/nominal basis and cash-flow timing. The example rate and five-year horizon are assumptions, not institutional financing terms; no credit approval follows.

Proposed checking role. Authorized credit/risk analyst and environmental/social specialist.

After the action. Realized cash flows, benefits and costs versus the approved appraisal.

FAO Guidelines for financial economic environmental and social information — Institution publication. Section2 discounted cash-flow analysis and NPV. Published discounted cash-flow method; local rate, horizon and cash assumptions are separate.
SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

CBSL sustainable finance — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
CBSL Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy 2022 — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

5. Refer climate-exposed financing cases for specialist assessmentDEC-DP38-005 · Climate risk · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Refer climate-exposed financing cases for specialist assessment.

Validation required

Method. Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.

Next step. Complete the evidence. Select a feasible control, escalate beyond authority, or seek technical inspection.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Asset locations; Asset locations evidence reference; hazards; hazards evidence reference; exposure; exposure evidence reference; adaptation; adaptation evidence reference; insurance; insurance evidence reference; sector vulnerability; sector vulnerability evidence reference; Documented unresolved critical condition; Evidence observation date; Existing control and its evidence; Competent recipient

Other required evidence. Asset locations; hazards; exposure; adaptation; insurance; sector vulnerability.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — climate risk · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Asset locations	Missing
Asset locations evidence reference
hazards	Documented
hazards evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
exposure	Documented
exposure evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
adaptation	Documented
adaptation evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
insurance	Documented
insurance evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
sector vulnerability	Documented
sector vulnerability evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
Documented unresolved critical condition	Unknown
Evidence observation date	2025-06-30
Existing control and its evidence	Sample documented control
Competent recipient	Responsible specialist / duty authority
Evidence gaps	1	items

Show the hazard, exposure and verified controls separately. No generic score, probability, diagnosis, site clearance or official warning is derived from a count.

Proposed checking role. Authorized credit/risk analyst and environmental/social specialist.

After the action. Verified control effectiveness and residual risk with evidence.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

CBSL sustainable finance — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
CBSL Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy 2022 — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

6. Compare documented environmental and social controlsDEC-DP38-006 · Environmental and social risk · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Evaluate documented environmental and social controls.

Validation required

Method. Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.

Next step. Complete the evidence. Select a feasible control, escalate beyond authority, or seek technical inspection.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Project screening; Project screening evidence reference; permits; permits evidence reference; affected people; affected people evidence reference; safeguards; safeguards evidence reference; controls; controls evidence reference; lender policy; lender policy evidence reference; Documented unresolved critical condition; Evidence observation date; Existing control and its evidence; Competent recipient

Other required evidence. Project screening; permits; affected people; safeguards; controls; lender policy.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — environmental and social risk · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Project screening	Missing
Project screening evidence reference
permits	Documented
permits evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
affected people	Documented
affected people evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
safeguards	Documented
safeguards evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
controls	Documented
controls evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
lender policy	Documented
lender policy evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
Documented unresolved critical condition	Unknown
Evidence observation date	2025-06-30
Existing control and its evidence	Sample documented control
Competent recipient	Responsible specialist / duty authority
Evidence gaps	1	items

Show the hazard, exposure and verified controls separately. No generic score, probability, diagnosis, site clearance or official warning is derived from a count.

Proposed checking role. Authorized credit/risk analyst and environmental/social specialist.

After the action. Verified control effectiveness and residual risk with evidence.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

CBSL sustainable finance — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
CBSL Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy 2022 — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

7. Refer proposed green-finance classifications for verificationDEC-DP38-007 · Green taxonomy · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Refer proposed green-finance classifications for verification.

Validation required

Method. Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.

Next step. Complete the evidence. Submit a recommendation to the appointed authority, request evidence, or record an appeal.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Activity; Activity evidence reference; taxonomy edition; taxonomy edition evidence reference; technical criteria; technical criteria evidence reference; safeguards; safeguards evidence reference; evidence; evidence evidence reference; reviewer; reviewer evidence reference

Other required evidence. Activity; taxonomy edition; technical criteria; safeguards; evidence; reviewer.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — green taxonomy · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Activity	Missing
Activity evidence reference
taxonomy edition	Documented
taxonomy edition evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
technical criteria	Documented
technical criteria evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
safeguards	Documented
safeguards evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
evidence	Documented
evidence evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
reviewer	Documented
reviewer evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
Evidence gaps	1	items

Evidence completeness alone cannot establish suitability, eligibility, safety, permission or method validity.

Proposed checking role. Authorized credit/risk analyst and environmental/social specialist.

After the action. Documented determinations, processing time and appeal outcomes.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

CBSL Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy 2022 — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
CBSL sustainable finance — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

8. Find missing or contradictory borrower evidenceDEC-DP38-008 · Credit evidence · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Identify missing or contradictory borrower evidence.

Validation required

Method. Compare original definitions, identifiers, units and versions against documented equivalence evidence. Preserve conflicts and unresolved mappings; do not subtract category labels or silently merge records.

Next step. Resolve source disagreement. Assign discrepancies to the custodian, accept documented corrections, or retain unresolved versions.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Original source value/definition; Comparison source value/definition; Original version; Comparison version; Documented equivalence evidence

Other required evidence. Consented borrower records; financial statements; debt declarations; verification; source dates.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — credit evidence · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Original source value/definition	Consented borrower records: primary register entry
Comparison source value/definition	Consented borrower records: conflicting source return
Original version	Sample version1
Comparison version	Sample version2
Documented equivalence evidence	Unresolved
Unresolved equivalence items	1	items

Proposed checking role. Authorized credit/risk analyst and environmental/social specialist.

After the action. Discrepancies resolved with evidence and repeat error rate.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

CBSL sustainable finance — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
CBSL Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy 2022 — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

9. Compare repayment schedules with agricultural cash generationDEC-DP38-009 · Seasonal lending · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Compare repayment schedules with agricultural cash generation.

Validation required

Method. Debt-service coverage = cash available / (principal + interest) for the same period. Zero scheduled debt has no coverage ratio.

Next step. Review evidence. Refer affordability and stress results to credit authority, revise terms, or request more evidence.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Cash available for debt service [LKR]; Scheduled principal for same period [LKR]; Scheduled interest for same period [LKR]; Repayment and cash-flow period

Other required evidence. Crop calendar; projected receipts; input payments; debt terms; downside scenarios.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — seasonal lending · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Cash available for debt service	860,000	LKR
Scheduled principal for same period	500,000	LKR
Scheduled interest for same period	120,000	LKR
Repayment and cash-flow period	Sample annual period
Debt-service coverage	1.387	ratio
Cash after scheduled debt service	240,000	LKR

No lender covenant, credit decision, borrower eligibility or legal consequence is inferred. Seasonal repayment timing and downside scenarios remain explicit.

Proposed checking role. Authorized credit/risk analyst and environmental/social specialist.

After the action. Actual debt service, arrears and cash coverage under agreed terms.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

CBSL sustainable finance — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
CBSL Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy 2022 — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

10. Review sector geography and counterparty exposure concentrationDEC-DP38-010 · Portfolio concentration · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Review sector geography and counterparty exposure concentration.

Verified published component · HHI concentration component

Method. Category share = 100 × category amount / total compatible category amounts. HHI = sum of squared fractional shares, displayed on a 0–1 scale.

Next step. Review evidence. Diversify feasible exposure, manage a dependency, or retain it with an approved rationale.

Inputs, example and sources

United States Department of Justice · Herfindahl Hirschman Index
Government publication · Definition and four-firm worked example

The screen uses fractional shares on a 0–1 scale, equivalent to the published percentage-share score divided by 10000. Local exposure categories and policy thresholds are not verified by this source.

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Compatible category amount [LKR]

Other required evidence. Exposure value; sector; geography; counterparty; portfolio total; period.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Agriculture · Laggala Pallegama reporting frame

Input or result	Value	Unit
Compatible category amount	95	LKR
Category amount	95	LKR
Share of selected total	4.762	%

Categories must be mutually exclusive and cover the stated frame. Do not mix values, quantities, plots or hectares, or treat an HHI competition threshold as an institutional policy.

Proposed checking role. Authorized credit/risk analyst and environmental/social specialist.

After the action. Counterparty shares, exposure and realized service/market outcomes.

US Department of Justice Herfindahl Hirschman Index — Government publication. HHI definition. Published squared-market-share concentration measure. Prototype uses fractional0–1 scale and no competition-policy threshold.
SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

CBSL sustainable finance — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
CBSL Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy 2022 — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

11. Choose what to handle first: overdue cases for authorized engagementDEC-DP38-011 · Arrears management · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Prioritize overdue cases for authorized engagement.

Validation required

Method. Open age = assessment date − received date. Days past due = max(0, assessment date − recorded due date) for open cases. Show documented critical conditions separately.

Next step. Follow up overdue case. Assign the next permitted case, escalate an overdue case, request evidence, or close with proof.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Received or defect observed; Recorded due date; Assessment date; Case/work closed; Documented critical unresolved condition; Responsible office or maintainer; Actual closure date when closed

Other required evidence. Loan; installment due date; outstanding amount; dispute; payment history; policy.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — arrears management · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Received or defect observed	2025-04-01
Recorded due date	2025-06-01
Assessment date	2025-06-30
Case/work closed	No
Documented critical unresolved condition	Unknown
Responsible office or maintainer	Proposed responsible office
Actual closure date when closed
Open days past due	29	days
Calendar age	90	days

Example due dates are not legal service standards. Do not alter statutory deadlines by silently subtracting pauses, or infer severity from age alone.

Proposed checking role. Authorized credit/risk analyst and environmental/social specialist.

After the action. Response time, aged cases, completion and reopened cases.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

CBSL sustainable finance — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
CBSL Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy 2022 — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

12. Refer collateral evidence gaps to qualified valuers and legal teamsDEC-DP38-012 · Collateral review · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Refer collateral evidence gaps to qualified valuers and legal teams.

Validation required

Method. Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.

Next step. Complete the evidence. Request correction, refer mandatory failures, or accept the inspected item with conditions.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Asset; Asset evidence reference; valuation date; valuation date evidence reference; rights documents; rights documents evidence reference; encumbrances; encumbrances evidence reference; hazards; hazards evidence reference; review conditions; review conditions evidence reference

Other required evidence. Asset; valuation date; rights documents; encumbrances; hazards; review conditions.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — collateral review · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Asset	Missing
Asset evidence reference
valuation date	Documented
valuation date evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
rights documents	Documented
rights documents evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
encumbrances	Documented
encumbrances evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
hazards	Documented
hazards evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
review conditions	Documented
review conditions evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
Evidence gaps	1	items

Evidence completeness alone cannot establish suitability, eligibility, safety, permission or method validity.

Proposed checking role. Authorized credit/risk analyst and environmental/social specialist.

After the action. Evidence-backed corrective closure and recurring nonconformances.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

CBSL sustainable finance — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
CBSL Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy 2022 — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

13. Check prerequisites before authorized disbursement decisionsDEC-DP38-013 · Disbursement conditions · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Verify prerequisites before authorized disbursement decisions.

Validation required

Method. Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.

Next step. Complete the evidence. Request correction, refer mandatory failures, or accept the inspected item with conditions.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Facility terms; Facility terms evidence reference; conditions precedent; conditions precedent evidence reference; documents; documents evidence reference; approvals; approvals evidence reference; borrower consent; borrower consent evidence reference

Other required evidence. Facility terms; conditions precedent; documents; approvals; borrower consent.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — disbursement conditions · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Facility terms	Missing
Facility terms evidence reference
conditions precedent	Documented
conditions precedent evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
documents	Documented
documents evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
approvals	Documented
approvals evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
borrower consent	Documented
borrower consent evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
Evidence gaps	1	items

Evidence completeness alone cannot establish suitability, eligibility, safety, permission or method validity.

Proposed checking role. Authorized credit/risk analyst and environmental/social specialist.

After the action. Evidence-backed corrective closure and recurring nonconformances.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

CBSL sustainable finance — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
CBSL Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy 2022 — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

14. Review evidence supporting financed environmental and social outcomesDEC-DP38-014 · Impact claims · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Review evidence supporting financed environmental and social outcomes.

Verified published formula · Difference-in-differences arithmetic

Method. (Treatment after−before) − (comparison after−before), using the same outcome definition and periods.

Next step. Supply study-design evidence. Continue, adapt, expand or stop a programme based on defensible outcome evidence.

Inputs, example and sources

World Bank · Impact Evaluation in Practice Second Edition
Institution publication · Chapter 7, table 7.2, printed page 140, PDF page 170

The formula is verified. Causal interpretation still requires a defensible study design, comparison and assumptions.

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Treatment Verified environmental/social indicator before [specified outcome unit]; Treatment Verified environmental/social indicator after [specified outcome unit]; Comparison Verified environmental/social indicator before [specified outcome unit]; Comparison Verified environmental/social indicator after [specified outcome unit]; Study design and comparability evidence; Outcome definition, method and reference basis

Other required evidence. Baseline; financed activity; follow-up; verification; attribution; uncertainty.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — impact claims · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Treatment Verified environmental/social indicator before	42	specified outcome unit
Treatment Verified environmental/social indicator after	59	specified outcome unit
Comparison Verified environmental/social indicator before	39	specified outcome unit
Comparison Verified environmental/social indicator after	46	specified outcome unit
Study design and comparability evidence	Missing
Outcome definition, method and reference basis	Verified environmental/social indicator /example matching definition1
Difference in changes	10	specified outcome unit

The arithmetic alone does not establish causation. Design, parallel trends, confounding, attrition, uncertainty and adverse effects need appropriate evidence.

Proposed checking role. Authorized credit/risk analyst and environmental/social specialist.

After the action. Verified outcomes, costs, distributional effects and evidence strength.

World Bank Impact Evaluation in Practice Second Edition — Institution publication. Chapter7 difference-in-differences. Published difference-in-differences estimator and study assumptions; aggregate examples do not establish causation.
SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

CBSL sustainable finance — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
CBSL Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy 2022 — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

15. Resolve financing applications stalled at required review stagesDEC-DP38-015 · Application processing · Suggested priority: Medium

Try this decision

Resolve financing applications stalled at required review stages.

Validation required

Method. 100 × verified completed members / original unique cohort. Keep unknown follow-up separate; stages are nested, not independent populations.

Next step. Review evidence. Address stage bottlenecks, follow up dropouts, or revise service delivery.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Unique original cohort entrants [cases]; Entrants reviewed [cases]; Entrants with verified completion [cases]; Entrants with unknown follow-up [cases]

Other required evidence. Application; stage timestamps; evidence requests; responsible reviewer; deadlines.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — application processing · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Unique original cohort entrants	180	cases
Entrants reviewed	132	cases
Entrants with verified completion	96	cases
Entrants with unknown follow-up	12	cases
Verified completion share	53.333	%
Not verified complete	84	cases

Attendance, receipt, adoption, delivered service and outcomes are distinct stages. Repeated visits must not become new people.

Proposed checking role. Authorized credit/risk analyst and environmental/social specialist.

After the action. Verified progression, waiting times and outcomes for the same cohort.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

CBSL sustainable finance — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
CBSL Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy 2022 — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

16. Refer guarantee requests against approved scheme criteriaDEC-DP38-016 · Guarantee programmes · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Refer guarantee requests against approved scheme criteria.

Validation required

Method. Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.

Next step. Complete the evidence. Submit a recommendation to the appointed authority, request evidence, or record an appeal.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Scheme version; Scheme version evidence reference; applicant; applicant evidence reference; qualifying use; qualifying use evidence reference; evidence; evidence evidence reference; coverage conditions; coverage conditions evidence reference; authority; authority evidence reference

Other required evidence. Scheme version; applicant; qualifying use; evidence; coverage conditions; authority.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — guarantee programmes · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Scheme version	Missing
Scheme version evidence reference
applicant	Documented
applicant evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
qualifying use	Documented
qualifying use evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
evidence	Documented
evidence evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
coverage conditions	Documented
coverage conditions evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
authority	Documented
authority evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
Evidence gaps	1	items

Evidence completeness alone cannot establish suitability, eligibility, safety, permission or method validity.

Proposed checking role. Authorized credit/risk analyst and environmental/social specialist.

After the action. Documented determinations, processing time and appeal outcomes.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

CBSL sustainable finance — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
CBSL Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy 2022 — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

17. Find gaps in access to appropriate financing servicesDEC-DP38-017 · Financial inclusion · Suggested priority: Medium

Try this decision

Identify gaps in access to appropriate financing services.

Validation required

Method. 100 × distinct covered eligible units / eligible frame. Known uncovered = frame − covered − unknown.

Next step. Review evidence. Select eligible underserved units for outreach, investigate missing coverage, or revise the verified frame.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Required eligible frame [applicants]; Distinct members of that frame covered [applicants]; Frame members with unknown coverage [applicants]

Other required evidence. Eligible demand; applications; offers; uptake; consented attributes; geography.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — financial inclusion · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Required eligible frame	100	applicants
Distinct members of that frame covered	65	applicants
Frame members with unknown coverage	5	applicants
Verified coverage	65	%
Known uncovered	30	applicants
Unknown coverage	5	applicants

Count each eligible unit once for the selected service and period. Received messages, attendance, adoption and outcomes are separate measures.

Proposed checking role. Authorized credit/risk analyst and environmental/social specialist.

After the action. Verified eligible units receiving service and remaining unmet need.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

CBSL sustainable finance — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
CBSL Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy 2022 — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

18. Compare expected funding inflows with committed disbursementsDEC-DP38-018 · Liquidity planning · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Compare expected funding inflows with committed disbursements.

Validation required

Method. Opening + receipts/additions − payments/reductions − other documented adjustments. Compare with independently recorded closing. A negative cash scenario is a shortfall, not an invalid water volume.

Next step. Reconcile closing balance. Investigate unexplained balances and propose revised measurement or operating action.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Opening cash/receivable balance [LKR]; Receipts and documented additions [LKR]; Payments and documented reductions [LKR]; Other documented non-overlapping adjustments [LKR]; Independently recorded closing balance [LKR]

Other required evidence. Opening liquidity; inflows; commitments; disbursement dates; restrictions; stress case.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — liquidity planning · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Opening cash/receivable balance	160,000	LKR
Receipts and documented additions	48,000	LKR
Payments and documented reductions	35,000	LKR
Other documented non-overlapping adjustments	9,000	LKR
Independently recorded closing balance	163,500	LKR
Calculated closing balance	164,000	LKR
Recorded minus calculated closing	-500	LKR

Use the same physical boundary, period and units. A residual is a reconciliation issue, not automatically a measured loss.

Proposed checking role. Authorized credit/risk analyst and environmental/social specialist.

After the action. Reconciled balance residuals and verified operating results.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

CBSL sustainable finance — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
CBSL Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy 2022 — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

19. Compare financing alternatives for resilient farm and enterprise investmentsDEC-DP38-019 · Adaptation finance · Suggested priority: Medium

Try this decision

Compare financing alternatives for resilient farm and enterprise investments.

Validation required

Method. Budget minus option cost. Compare benefits, adverse effects and mandatory constraints separately; no weighted score or automatic best option.

Next step. Compare feasible trade-offs. Choose a feasible alternative with rationale and conditions, commission evidence, or defer.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Option cost [LKR]; Available budget [LKR]; Mandatory constraints; Expected benefit and its evidence; Resource needs and adverse effects

Other required evidence. Adaptation options; costs; cash benefits; risk changes; terms; evidence.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Equipment financing · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Option cost	1,500,000	LKR
Available budget	1,800,000	LKR
Mandatory constraints	Met
Expected benefit and its evidence	Compare financing alternatives for resilient farm and enterprise investments; Adaptation options and costs evidence needed
Resource needs and adverse effects	Sample water, labour, access and safeguard trade-offs
Budget remaining after option	300,000	LKR

Affordability does not prove feasibility or scientific suitability. A missing mandatory condition keeps an option unresolved.

Proposed checking role. Authorized credit/risk analyst and environmental/social specialist.

After the action. Verified benefits, costs and adverse effects versus the agreed baseline.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

CBSL sustainable finance — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
CBSL Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy 2022 — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

20. Determine permitted use and sharing of client dataDEC-DP38-020 · Financial privacy · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Determine permitted use and sharing of client data.

Validation required

Method. Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.

Next step. Complete the evidence. Grant only scoped authorized access, aggregate/redact, refuse, or request approval.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Purpose; Purpose evidence reference; lawful basis; lawful basis evidence reference; consent; consent evidence reference; classification; classification evidence reference; recipient; recipient evidence reference; access scope; access scope evidence reference; expiry; expiry evidence reference

Other required evidence. Purpose; lawful basis; consent; classification; recipient; access scope; expiry.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — financial privacy · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Purpose	Missing
Purpose evidence reference
lawful basis	Documented
lawful basis evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
consent	Documented
consent evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
classification	Documented
classification evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
recipient	Documented
recipient evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
access scope	Documented
access scope evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
expiry	Documented
expiry evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
Evidence gaps	1	items

Evidence completeness alone cannot establish suitability, eligibility, safety, permission or method validity.

Proposed checking role. Authorized credit/risk analyst and environmental/social specialist.

After the action. Permitted use, expiry compliance and investigated disclosure incidents.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

CBSL sustainable finance — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
CBSL Sri Lanka Green Finance Taxonomy 2022 — Government publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

Field	Unit	Required
Bank Name	Confirm if needed	No
ATM ID	Confirm if needed	No
Total Machines	Confirm if needed	No
Description	Confirm if needed	No

Field	Unit	Required
Bank Name	Confirm if needed	No
Bank ID	Confirm if needed	No
Branch Name	Confirm if needed	No
Working Hours	Confirm if needed	No
Working Days	Confirm if needed	No
Description	Confirm if needed	No
GND Name	Confirm if needed	No

Field	Unit	Required
Sector	Confirm if needed	No
Year	Confirm if needed	No
Export earnings	USD million	No
Reporting basis	Confirm if needed	No

Field	Unit	Required
Sector	Confirm if needed	No
Year	Confirm if needed	No
Export contribution	%	No
Reporting basis	Confirm if needed	No

Field	Unit	Required
Funding item	Confirm if needed	No
Instrument	Confirm if needed	No
Amount	USD	No
Currency	Confirm if needed	No
Date	Confirm if needed	No
Basis	Confirm if needed	No

1. Check a decision

2. Try the inputs

3. Check each decision

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

4. Existing data forms for your institution

5. Documents and images

What you can try

What your institution needs to confirm

6. Data structure management

What you can try

What your institution needs to confirm

7. Users and access

What you can try

What your institution needs to confirm

9. Anything else we should change?

Banks and Finance Institutions

1. Check a decision

2. Try the inputs

3. Check each decision

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

4. Existing data forms for your institution

5. Documents and images

What you can try

What your institution needs to confirm

6. Data structure management

What you can try

What your institution needs to confirm

7. Users and access

What you can try

What your institution needs to confirm

8. Can you share data regularly?

9. Anything else we should change?