Community-Based Organizations and NGOs

Tell us what to change or add.

Your name (optional)Your roleReview date

Continue a saved review

1. Check a decision

Open a decision below. Check the area, period, inputs, result and proposed next step.

2. Try the inputs

Use Example input to change a sample. Use Source input to check the fields and source details. The land-use change decision has its own comparison views.

Record your corrections below, then download your answers or print them.

3. Check each decision

1. Target communities missing intended livelihood support 2. Choose what to handle first: unresolved feedback and complaints 3. Check practical outcomes after community training 4. Escalate locations with prolonged community-service delays 5. Compare community priorities using inclusive evidence 6. Resolve barriers to meaningful community participation 7. Prepare complete evidence for authorized programme selection 8. Coordinate complementary assistance and review potential duplication 9. Route sensitive concerns through authorized confidential channels 10. Compare community-led adaptation alternatives 11. Choose what to handle first: repairs to shared livelihood and water assets 12. Match volunteer capacity to approved community tasks 13. Compare and correct differences in community grants and verified expenditure 14. Find feasible market links for community enterprises 15. Target communities lacking reliable safe service access 16. Address gaps in local warning and evacuation arrangements 17. Follow up participants lost from continuing support programmes 18. Compare whether programmes produced sustained community benefits 19. Resolve unclear ownership of cross-organization actions 20. Improve completeness of consented community monitoring records

1. Target communities missing intended livelihood supportDEC-DP41-001 · Livelihood reach · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Target communities missing intended livelihood support.

Validation required

Method. 100 × distinct covered eligible units / eligible frame. Known uncovered = frame − covered − unknown.

Next step. Review evidence. Select eligible underserved units for outreach, investigate missing coverage, or revise the verified frame.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Required eligible frame [households]; Distinct members of that frame covered [households]; Frame members with unknown coverage [households]

Other required evidence. Eligible community frame; unique recipients; service type; location; period.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — livelihood reach · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Required eligible frame	100	households
Distinct members of that frame covered	65	households
Frame members with unknown coverage	5	households
Verified coverage	65	%
Known uncovered	30	households
Unknown coverage	5	households

Count each eligible unit once for the selected service and period. Received messages, attendance, adoption and outcomes are separate measures.

Proposed checking role. Community programme lead, participant representatives and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Verified eligible units receiving service and remaining unmet need.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
WHO water safety planning — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

Your checks for this decisionDoes this decision belong to your institution?Is the required data list complete?Are the sources, places and time periods suitable?Can staff use the proposed entry or upload steps?Are the calculation, units and limits correct?Do the chart and result help you decide?Are the checking officer and decision authority correct?Are the access and sharing limits suitable?

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

2. Choose what to handle first: unresolved feedback and complaintsDEC-DP41-002 · Community feedback · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Prioritize unresolved feedback and complaints.

Validation required

Method. Open age = assessment date − received date. Days past due = max(0, assessment date − recorded due date) for open cases. Show documented critical conditions separately.

Next step. Follow up overdue case. Assign the next permitted case, escalate an overdue case, request evidence, or close with proof.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Received or defect observed; Recorded due date; Assessment date; Case/work closed; Documented critical unresolved condition; Responsible office or maintainer; Actual closure date when closed

Other required evidence. Case; category; received date; response; due date; accountable recipient.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — community feedback · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Received or defect observed	2025-04-01
Recorded due date	2025-06-01
Assessment date	2025-06-30
Case/work closed	No
Documented critical unresolved condition	Unknown
Responsible office or maintainer	Proposed responsible office
Actual closure date when closed
Open days past due	29	days
Calendar age	90	days

Example due dates are not legal service standards. Do not alter statutory deadlines by silently subtracting pauses, or infer severity from age alone.

Proposed checking role. Community programme lead, participant representatives and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Response time, aged cases, completion and reopened cases.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
WHO water safety planning — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

3. Check practical outcomes after community trainingDEC-DP41-003 · Training follow-up · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Verify practical outcomes after community training.

Validation required

Method. 100 × verified completed members / original unique cohort. Keep unknown follow-up separate; stages are nested, not independent populations.

Next step. Review evidence. Address stage bottlenecks, follow up dropouts, or revise service delivery.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Unique original cohort entrants [cases]; Entrants reviewed [cases]; Entrants with verified completion [cases]; Entrants with unknown follow-up [cases]

Other required evidence. Training cohort; attendance; skills evidence; practice uptake; follow-up date.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — training follow-up · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Unique original cohort entrants	180	cases
Entrants reviewed	132	cases
Entrants with verified completion	96	cases
Entrants with unknown follow-up	12	cases
Verified completion share	53.333	%
Not verified complete	84	cases

Attendance, receipt, adoption, delivered service and outcomes are distinct stages. Repeated visits must not become new people.

Proposed checking role. Community programme lead, participant representatives and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Verified progression, waiting times and outcomes for the same cohort.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
WHO water safety planning — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

4. Escalate locations with prolonged community-service delaysDEC-DP41-004 · Service delays · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Escalate locations with prolonged community-service delays.

Validation required

Method. Open age = assessment date − received date. Days past due = max(0, assessment date − recorded due date) for open cases. Show documented critical conditions separately.

Next step. Follow up overdue case. Assign the next permitted case, escalate an overdue case, request evidence, or close with proof.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Other required evidence. Service request; location; receipt; completion; pauses; approved target.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — service delays · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Received or defect observed	2025-04-01
Recorded due date	2025-06-01
Assessment date	2025-06-30
Case/work closed	No
Documented critical unresolved condition	Unknown
Responsible office or maintainer	Proposed responsible office
Actual closure date when closed
Open days past due	29	days
Calendar age	90	days

Example due dates are not legal service standards. Do not alter statutory deadlines by silently subtracting pauses, or infer severity from age alone.

Proposed checking role. Community programme lead, participant representatives and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Response time, aged cases, completion and reopened cases.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
WHO water safety planning — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

5. Compare community priorities using inclusive evidenceDEC-DP41-005 · Needs assessment · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Compare community priorities using inclusive evidence.

Validation required

Method. Budget minus option cost. Compare benefits, adverse effects and mandatory constraints separately; no weighted score or automatic best option.

Next step. Compare feasible trade-offs. Choose a feasible alternative with rationale and conditions, commission evidence, or defer.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Option cost [LKR]; Available budget [LKR]; Mandatory constraints; Expected benefit and its evidence; Resource needs and adverse effects

Other required evidence. Needs; affected groups; options; costs; feasibility; consultations; constraints.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Livelihood training · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Option cost	1,500,000	LKR
Available budget	1,800,000	LKR
Mandatory constraints	Met
Expected benefit and its evidence	Compare community priorities using inclusive evidence; Needs and affected groups evidence needed
Resource needs and adverse effects	Sample water, labour, access and safeguard trade-offs
Budget remaining after option	300,000	LKR

Affordability does not prove feasibility or scientific suitability. A missing mandatory condition keeps an option unresolved.

Proposed checking role. Community programme lead, participant representatives and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Verified benefits, costs and adverse effects versus the agreed baseline.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
WHO water safety planning — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

6. Resolve barriers to meaningful community participationDEC-DP41-006 · Participation · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Resolve barriers to meaningful community participation.

Validation required

Method. 100 × distinct respondents / invited people. Record unresolved issues individually; one respondent may raise several issues.

Next step. Resolve participation barriers and issues. Address concerns, revise the proposal, seek required responses, or escalate unresolved conditions.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Distinct relevant people invited [people]; People who responded [people]; Unresolved issues [issues]; Proposal/version being discussed; Required participation channels accessible

Other required evidence. Stakeholder frame; accessible meetings; responses; representation; concerns; resolution.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — participation · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Distinct relevant people invited	95	people
People who responded	68	people
Unresolved issues	16	issues
Proposal/version being discussed	Sample proposal1
Required participation channels accessible	Unknown
Response share	71.579	%
Unresolved issues	16	issues

Response, attendance and silence are not consent. Participation does not transfer decision authority or settle rights.

Proposed checking role. Community programme lead, participant representatives and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Resolved concerns, participation and compliance with recorded commitments.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
WHO water safety planning — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

7. Prepare complete evidence for authorized programme selectionDEC-DP41-007 · Beneficiary selection · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Prepare complete evidence for authorized programme selection.

Validation required

Method. Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.

Next step. Complete the evidence. Submit a recommendation to the appointed authority, request evidence, or record an appeal.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Programme criteria; Programme criteria evidence reference; household consent; household consent evidence reference; needs evidence; needs evidence evidence reference; prior support; prior support evidence reference; appeals; appeals evidence reference

Other required evidence. Programme criteria; household consent; needs evidence; prior support; appeals.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — beneficiary selection · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Programme criteria	Missing
Programme criteria evidence reference
household consent	Documented
household consent evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
needs evidence	Documented
needs evidence evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
prior support	Documented
prior support evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
appeals	Documented
appeals evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
Evidence gaps	1	items

Evidence completeness alone cannot establish suitability, eligibility, safety, permission or method validity.

Proposed checking role. Community programme lead, participant representatives and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Documented determinations, processing time and appeal outcomes.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
WHO water safety planning — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

8. Coordinate complementary assistance and review potential duplicationDEC-DP41-008 · Support overlap · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Coordinate complementary assistance and review potential duplication.

Validation required

Method. Compare the same permitted entity, purpose and qualifying unit. Intersect dated support intervals; overlapping support is a review flag, not proof of duplicate entitlement.

Next step. Review possible overlap. Resolve duplicate identity or overlapping support and decide permitted complementary assistance.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Permitted recipient/service reference; Support purpose; Earlier support period begins; Earlier support period ends; Other support period begins; Other support period ends; Same purpose and qualifying unit

Other required evidence. Participant identifiers; programme; purpose; period; assistance; data-sharing permission.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — support overlap · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Permitted recipient/service reference	Laggala Pallegama — support overlap
Support purpose	Sample seasonal input support
Earlier support period begins	2025-01-01
Earlier support period ends	2025-06-30
Other support period begins	2025-05-01
Other support period ends	2025-08-31
Same purpose and qualifying unit	Yes
Overlapping days	61	days

Proposed checking role. Community programme lead, participant representatives and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Confirmed unique support and unresolved overlap cases.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
WHO water safety planning — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

9. Route sensitive concerns through authorized confidential channelsDEC-DP41-009 · Safeguarding referrals · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Route sensitive concerns through authorized confidential channels.

Validation required

Method. Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.

Next step. Complete the evidence. Grant only scoped authorized access, aggregate/redact, refuse, or request approval.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Confidential case; Confidential case evidence reference; consent; consent evidence reference; urgency; urgency evidence reference; designated receiver; designated receiver evidence reference; referral; referral evidence reference; follow-up; follow-up evidence reference

Other required evidence. Confidential case; consent; urgency; designated receiver; referral; follow-up.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — safeguarding referrals · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Confidential case	Missing
Confidential case evidence reference
consent	Documented
consent evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
urgency	Documented
urgency evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
designated receiver	Documented
designated receiver evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
referral	Documented
referral evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
follow-up	Documented
follow-up evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
Evidence gaps	1	items

Evidence completeness alone cannot establish suitability, eligibility, safety, permission or method validity.

Proposed checking role. Community programme lead, participant representatives and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Permitted use, expiry compliance and investigated disclosure incidents.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
WHO water safety planning — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

10. Compare community-led adaptation alternativesDEC-DP41-010 · Climate adaptation · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Compare community-led adaptation alternatives.

Validation required

Method. Budget minus option cost. Compare benefits, adverse effects and mandatory constraints separately; no weighted score or automatic best option.

Next step. Compare feasible trade-offs. Choose a feasible alternative with rationale and conditions, commission evidence, or defer.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Option cost [LKR]; Available budget [LKR]; Mandatory constraints; Expected benefit and its evidence; Resource needs and adverse effects

Other required evidence. Climate exposure; local knowledge; options; costs; livelihoods; safeguards.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Livelihood training · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Option cost	1,500,000	LKR
Available budget	1,800,000	LKR
Mandatory constraints	Met
Expected benefit and its evidence	Compare community-led adaptation alternatives; Climate exposure and local knowledge evidence needed
Resource needs and adverse effects	Sample water, labour, access and safeguard trade-offs
Budget remaining after option	300,000	LKR

Affordability does not prove feasibility or scientific suitability. A missing mandatory condition keeps an option unresolved.

Proposed checking role. Community programme lead, participant representatives and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Verified benefits, costs and adverse effects versus the agreed baseline.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
WHO water safety planning — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

11. Choose what to handle first: repairs to shared livelihood and water assetsDEC-DP41-011 · Community assets · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Prioritize repairs to shared livelihood and water assets.

Validation required

Method. Open age = assessment date − received date. Days past due = max(0, assessment date − recorded due date) for open cases. Show documented critical conditions separately.

Next step. Follow up overdue case. Authorize feasible repair through the proper work process, inspect further, or restrict unsafe use.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Other required evidence. Asset; condition; users affected; responsible owner; maintenance options; cost.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — community assets · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Received or defect observed	2025-04-01
Recorded due date	2025-06-01
Assessment date	2025-06-30
Case/work closed	No
Documented critical unresolved condition	Unknown
Responsible office or maintainer	Proposed responsible office
Actual closure date when closed
Open days past due	29	days
Calendar age	90	days

Example due dates are not legal service standards. Do not alter statutory deadlines by silently subtracting pauses, or infer severity from age alone.

Proposed checking role. Community programme lead, participant representatives and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Verified defect closure, service availability and repeat failures.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
WHO water safety planning — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

12. Match volunteer capacity to approved community tasksDEC-DP41-012 · Volunteer deployment · Suggested priority: Medium

Try this decision

Match volunteer capacity to approved community tasks.

Validation required

Method. Match documented expertise, available effort, date windows and required conflict/clearance evidence. A match suggests a candidate; it appoints nobody.

Next step. Resolve specification, window or conditions. Refer a feasible match for negotiation, request revised terms, or retain unmatched demand.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Documented skills/expertise; Task requirement; Available qualified effort [hours]; Required effort [hours]; Conflicts, clearance and mandate; Availability begins; Availability ends; Task window begins; Task window ends

Other required evidence. Task needs; skills; availability; safeguarding clearance; locations; schedule.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — volunteer deployment · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Documented skills/expertise	Sample required skill
Task requirement	Sample required skill
Available qualified effort	24	hours
Required effort	16	hours
Conflicts, clearance and mandate	Unresolved
Availability begins	2025-06-01
Availability ends	2025-06-20
Task window begins	2025-06-05
Task window ends	2025-06-18
Available minus required hours	8	hours

A candidate match does not reserve stock, appoint a person, authorize waste reuse or form a contract.

Proposed checking role. Community programme lead, participant representatives and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Confirmed fulfilled matches, quality, timeliness and unresolved demand.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
WHO water safety planning — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

13. Compare and correct differences in community grants and verified expenditureDEC-DP41-013 · Programme finance · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Reconcile community grants and verified expenditure.

Validation required

Method. Opening + receipts/additions − payments/reductions − other documented adjustments. Compare with independently recorded closing. A negative cash scenario is a shortfall, not an invalid water volume.

Next step. Reconcile closing balance. Investigate unexplained balances and propose revised measurement or operating action.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Opening cash/receivable balance [LKR]; Receipts and documented additions [LKR]; Payments and documented reductions [LKR]; Other documented non-overlapping adjustments [LKR]; Independently recorded closing balance [LKR]

Other required evidence. Approved budget; commitments; receipts; eligible spending; vouchers; balance.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — programme finance · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Opening cash/receivable balance	160,000	LKR
Receipts and documented additions	48,000	LKR
Payments and documented reductions	35,000	LKR
Other documented non-overlapping adjustments	9,000	LKR
Independently recorded closing balance	163,500	LKR
Calculated closing balance	164,000	LKR
Recorded minus calculated closing	-500	LKR

Use the same physical boundary, period and units. A residual is a reconciliation issue, not automatically a measured loss.

Proposed checking role. Community programme lead, participant representatives and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Reconciled balance residuals and verified operating results.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
WHO water safety planning — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

14. Find feasible market links for community enterprisesDEC-DP41-014 · Market access · Suggested priority: Medium

Try this decision

Identify feasible market links for community enterprises.

Validation required

Method. Compare the same specification and unit, uncommitted quantity and overlapping delivery windows. Keep mandatory quality and use conditions explicit.

Next step. Review quantity/capacity gap. Refer a feasible match for negotiation, request revised terms, or retain unmatched demand.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Offered product and grade; Required product and grade; Available uncommitted quantity [kg]; Required quantity [kg]; Supply available from; Supply available until; Delivery window begins; Delivery window ends; Required quality, rights and conditions

Other required evidence. Products; quality; quantities; buyer requirements; dates; access.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — market access · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Offered product and grade	Cleaned dry pepper / whole grain
Required product and grade	Cleaned dry pepper / whole grain
Available uncommitted quantity	1,200	kg
Required quantity	1,500	kg
Supply available from	2025-06-01
Supply available until	2025-06-20
Delivery window begins	2025-06-05
Delivery window ends	2025-06-18
Required quality, rights and conditions	Met
Supply minus demand	-300	kg

A candidate match does not reserve stock, appoint a person, authorize waste reuse or form a contract.

Proposed checking role. Community programme lead, participant representatives and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Confirmed fulfilled matches, quality, timeliness and unresolved demand.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
WHO water safety planning — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

15. Target communities lacking reliable safe service accessDEC-DP41-015 · Water and sanitation · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Target communities lacking reliable safe service access.

Validation required

Method. 100 × distinct covered eligible units / eligible frame. Known uncovered = frame − covered − unknown.

Next step. Review evidence. Select eligible underserved units for outreach, investigate missing coverage, or revise the verified frame.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Required eligible frame [households]; Distinct members of that frame covered [households]; Frame members with unknown coverage [households]

Other required evidence. Household frame; usable services; water evidence; sanitation; accessibility; coverage.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — water and sanitation · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Required eligible frame	100	households
Distinct members of that frame covered	65	households
Frame members with unknown coverage	5	households
Verified coverage	65	%
Known uncovered	30	households
Unknown coverage	5	households

Count each eligible unit once for the selected service and period. Received messages, attendance, adoption and outcomes are separate measures.

Proposed checking role. Community programme lead, participant representatives and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Verified eligible units receiving service and remaining unmet need.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
WHO water safety planning — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

16. Address gaps in local warning and evacuation arrangementsDEC-DP41-016 · Disaster preparedness · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Address gaps in local warning and evacuation arrangements.

Validation required

Method. Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.

Next step. Complete the evidence. Select a feasible control, escalate beyond authority, or seek technical inspection.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Official hazard information; Official hazard information evidence reference; warning access; warning access evidence reference; safe routes; safe routes evidence reference; vulnerable needs; vulnerable needs evidence reference; capacity; capacity evidence reference; Documented unresolved critical condition; Evidence observation date; Existing control and its evidence; Competent recipient

Other required evidence. Official hazard information; warning access; safe routes; vulnerable needs; capacity.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — disaster preparedness · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Official hazard information	Missing
Official hazard information evidence reference
warning access	Documented
warning access evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
safe routes	Documented
safe routes evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
vulnerable needs	Documented
vulnerable needs evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
capacity	Documented
capacity evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
Documented unresolved critical condition	Unknown
Evidence observation date	2025-06-30
Existing control and its evidence	Sample documented control
Competent recipient	Responsible specialist / duty authority
Evidence gaps	1	items

Show the hazard, exposure and verified controls separately. No generic score, probability, diagnosis, site clearance or official warning is derived from a count.

Proposed checking role. Community programme lead, participant representatives and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Verified control effectiveness and residual risk with evidence.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
WHO water safety planning — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

17. Follow up participants lost from continuing support programmesDEC-DP41-017 · Programme retention · Suggested priority: Medium

Try this decision

Follow up participants lost from continuing support programmes.

Validation required

Method. Lower =100 × known survivors / original cohort. Upper =100 × (known survivors + unknown) / original cohort. Survivors + known failures + unknown = original cohort; replacements do not enter it.

Next step. Review evidence. Replace failed establishment, alter maintenance, or investigate site/treatment causes.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Original distinct cohort [participants]; Known continuing original members [participants]; Known withdrawals [participants]; Unknown follow-up [participants]; Later entrants outside original cohort [participants]

Other required evidence. Participant cohort; start date; continued participation; withdrawal; nonresponse; reasons.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — programme retention · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Original distinct cohort	450	participants
Known continuing original members	351	participants
Known withdrawals	70	participants
Unknown follow-up	29	participants
Later entrants outside original cohort	18	participants
Confirmed continuation lower bound	78	%
Continuation upper bound	84.444	%
Unknown follow-up	29	participants

These bounds account for unknown status; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Use actual follow-up dates and distinguish cohort membership from repeated visits.

Proposed checking role. Community programme lead, participant representatives and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Survival of the original cohort, replacements and condition separately.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
WHO water safety planning — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

18. Compare whether programmes produced sustained community benefitsDEC-DP41-018 · Outcome evaluation · Suggested priority: High

Try this decision

Evaluate whether programmes produced sustained community benefits.

Verified published formula · Difference-in-differences arithmetic

Method. (Treatment after−before) − (comparison after−before), using the same outcome definition and periods.

Next step. Supply study-design evidence. Continue, adapt, expand or stop a programme based on defensible outcome evidence.

Inputs, example and sources

World Bank · Impact Evaluation in Practice Second Edition
Institution publication · Chapter 7, table 7.2, printed page 140, PDF page 170

The formula is verified. Causal interpretation still requires a defensible study design, comparison and assumptions.

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Treatment Consistently measured livelihood outcome before [LKR/household]; Treatment Consistently measured livelihood outcome after [LKR/household]; Comparison Consistently measured livelihood outcome before [LKR/household]; Comparison Consistently measured livelihood outcome after [LKR/household]; Study design and comparability evidence; Outcome definition, method and reference basis

Other required evidence. Baseline; follow-up; comparison; costs; unintended effects; community feedback.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — outcome evaluation · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Treatment Consistently measured livelihood outcome before	420,000	LKR/household
Treatment Consistently measured livelihood outcome after	590,000	LKR/household
Comparison Consistently measured livelihood outcome before	390,000	LKR/household
Comparison Consistently measured livelihood outcome after	460,000	LKR/household
Study design and comparability evidence	Missing
Outcome definition, method and reference basis	Consistently measured livelihood outcome /example matching definition1
Difference in changes	100,000	LKR/household

The arithmetic alone does not establish causation. Design, parallel trends, confounding, attrition, uncertainty and adverse effects need appropriate evidence.

Proposed checking role. Community programme lead, participant representatives and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Verified outcomes, costs, distributional effects and evidence strength.

World Bank Impact Evaluation in Practice Second Edition — Institution publication. Chapter7 difference-in-differences. Published difference-in-differences estimator and study assumptions; aggregate examples do not establish causation.
SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
WHO water safety planning — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

19. Resolve unclear ownership of cross-organization actionsDEC-DP41-019 · Partner coordination · Suggested priority: Medium

Try this decision

Resolve unclear ownership of cross-organization actions.

Validation required

Method. 100 × distinct respondents / invited people. Record unresolved issues individually; one respondent may raise several issues.

Next step. Resolve participation barriers and issues. Address concerns, revise the proposal, seek required responses, or escalate unresolved conditions.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Distinct relevant people invited [people]; People who responded [people]; Unresolved issues [issues]; Proposal/version being discussed; Required participation channels accessible

Other required evidence. Action; partner mandates; commitments; dependencies; consultation; due date.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — partner coordination · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Distinct relevant people invited	95	people
People who responded	68	people
Unresolved issues	16	issues
Proposal/version being discussed	Sample proposal1
Required participation channels accessible	Unknown
Response share	71.579	%
Unresolved issues	16	issues

Response, attendance and silence are not consent. Participation does not transfer decision authority or settle rights.

Proposed checking role. Community programme lead, participant representatives and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Resolved concerns, participation and compliance with recorded commitments.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
WHO water safety planning — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

20. Improve completeness of consented community monitoring recordsDEC-DP41-020 · Community evidence · Suggested priority: Lower

Try this decision

Improve completeness of consented community monitoring records.

Validation required

Method. Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.

Next step. Complete the evidence. Accept a fit source for a defined use, restrict it, or request metadata/schema correction.

Inputs, example and sources

Keep the same place, observation period, definitions, units and source versions.

Analysis inputs. Record; Record evidence reference; source; source evidence reference; consent; consent evidence reference; location; location evidence reference; period; period evidence reference; units; units evidence reference; reviewer; reviewer evidence reference; revision; revision evidence reference

Other required evidence. Record; source; consent; location; period; units; reviewer; revision.

Fictional worked example · 2025

Laggala Pallegama — community evidence · Laggala Pallegama

Input or result	Value	Unit
Record	Missing
Record evidence reference
source	Documented
source evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
consent	Documented
consent evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
location	Documented
location evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
period	Documented
period evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
units	Documented
units evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
reviewer	Documented
reviewer evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
revision	Documented
revision evidence reference	Sample Laggala Pallegama field register / 2025
Evidence gaps	1	items

Evidence completeness alone cannot establish suitability, eligibility, safety, permission or method validity.

Proposed checking role. Community programme lead, participant representatives and safeguarding reviewer.

After the action. Resolved interoperability issues and current verified metadata.

SHARED domain decision contracts — Validation required. Domain decision rules and matching fictional examples. Local comparisons, constraints, source matching, sorting and follow-up proposals; developer checks do not establish scientific or client approval.

Institution and data context

GCF FP124 project and documents — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
IFRC community engagement and accountability — Institution publication. Community Engagement and Accountability: participation and trusted feedback mechanisms. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.
WHO water safety planning — Institution publication. Full method locator not established. Institutional context; does not establish the calculation or local approval.

Confirm local scope, data rights, parameters and responsible roles in this Institution review. Published components retain their source; they do not approve the local application.

What must change? Include corrected fields, rules, limits or words.Who supplies the data, who checks it, and who makes the decision?How often is this decision needed? What would make it urgent?

4. Existing data forms for your institution

Check which existing source fields can supply the decision inputs.

Shelters · Geospatial Evidence

Existing form reference: 9ffd5f93309e0745

Field	Unit	Required
Shelter_Type	Confirm if needed	No
Shelter_Owned_by	Confirm if needed	No
Shelter_Capacity	Confirm if needed	No
Number_of_Floors	Confirm if needed	No

Water Fittings · Geospatial Evidence

Existing form reference: cf68d810309988ce

Field	Unit	Required
Fitting_Type	Confirm if needed	No
Material	Confirm if needed	No
Status	Confirm if needed	No
Rotation	Confirm if needed	No
Digitization_from	Confirm if needed	No
Map_Number	Confirm if needed	No
Update_Date	Confirm if needed	No
GID	Confirm if needed	No
Description	Confirm if needed	No

Water Meter · Geospatial Evidence

Existing form reference: 14c2ccb3f9d41ece

Field	Unit	Required
Meter_Type	Confirm if needed	No
Importance	Confirm if needed	No
Rotation	Confirm if needed	No
Digitization_from	Confirm if needed	No
Map_Number	Confirm if needed	No
Update_Date	Confirm if needed	No
GID	Confirm if needed	No
Description	Confirm if needed	No

Water Station · Geospatial Evidence

Existing form reference: d0aeab3fd60c3a9d

Field	Unit	Required
Station Type	Confirm if needed	No
Station Name	Confirm if needed	No
Suction Diameter	Confirm if needed	No
Deliver Diameter	Confirm if needed	No
Diameter Units	Confirm if needed	No
Rotation	Confirm if needed	No
Digitization From	Confirm if needed	No
Map Number	Confirm if needed	No
Update Date	Confirm if needed	No
GID	Confirm if needed	No
Description	Confirm if needed	No

Water Storage · Geospatial Evidence

Existing form reference: ae9ab4f456ba5f23

Field	Unit	Required
Storage Type	Confirm if needed	No
Name	Confirm if needed	No
Capacity	Confirm if needed	No
Water Level Top	Confirm if needed	No
Water Level Bottom	Confirm if needed	No
Overflow Level	Confirm if needed	No
Source Level	Confirm if needed	No
Inlet Size	Confirm if needed	No
Outlet Size	Confirm if needed	No
Rotation	Confirm if needed	No
Installed On	Confirm if needed	No
Digitization from	Confirm if needed	No
Map Number	Confirm if needed	No
Update Date	Confirm if needed	No
GID	Confirm if needed	No
Description	Confirm if needed	No

Water Valve · Geospatial Evidence

Existing form reference: c5ac68d0b95359c4

Field	Unit	Required
Valve_Type	Confirm if needed	No
Diameter	Confirm if needed	No
Diameter_Units	Confirm if needed	No
Material	Confirm if needed	No
Valve_ID	Confirm if needed	No
Status	Confirm if needed	No
Number_of_Turns	Confirm if needed	No
Open_Direction	Confirm if needed	No
Installed_Date	Confirm if needed	No
Rotation	Confirm if needed	No
Map_Number	Confirm if needed	No
Digitization_from	Confirm if needed	No
Update_Date	Confirm if needed	No
Description	Confirm if needed	No
GID	Confirm if needed	No

Water Pipe Line · Geospatial Evidence

Existing form reference: 5053ac757bff3e63

Field	Unit	Required
Line Type	Confirm if needed	No
Material	Confirm if needed	No
Diameter	Confirm if needed	No
Diameter Units	Confirm if needed	No
Project Name	Confirm if needed	No
Class	Confirm if needed	No
Laid On	Confirm if needed	No
Status	Confirm if needed	No
Map Number	Confirm if needed	No
Digitization from	Confirm if needed	No
File Number	Confirm if needed	No
Cement line	Confirm if needed	No
Year line	Confirm if needed	No
Update Date	Confirm if needed	No
st_length(shape)	Confirm if needed	No

Sewer Intercepter Manhole · Geospatial Evidence

Existing form reference: d413ae0270c31763

Field	Unit	Required
AccNo	Confirm if needed	No
Remarks	Confirm if needed	No
IC_Name	Confirm if needed	No
GID	Confirm if needed	No
Update_Date	Confirm if needed	No
Description	Confirm if needed	No

Sewer Manhole · Geospatial Evidence

Existing form reference: ff70df5e380dbd80

Field	Unit	Required
Name	Confirm if needed	No
Digitization from	Confirm if needed	No
Manhole Shape	Confirm if needed	No
Manhole Type	Confirm if needed	No
Depth_M	Confirm if needed	No
Internal_S	Confirm if needed	No
Units_of_S	Confirm if needed	No
Structural	Confirm if needed	No
Cover Material	Confirm if needed	No
Number of Stubs	Confirm if needed	No
Over Flow	Confirm if needed	No
Units_of_I	Confirm if needed	No
Units_of_d	Confirm if needed	No
Built on	Confirm if needed	No
Status	Confirm if needed	No
GID	Confirm if needed	No
Update Date	Confirm if needed	No
Remarks	Confirm if needed	No
Description	Confirm if needed	No

Sewer Force Main · Geospatial Evidence

Existing form reference: c5ff0d47bd7b53da

Field	Unit	Required
Line_Name	Confirm if needed	No
Digitization_from	Confirm if needed	No
Diameter	Confirm if needed	No
Diameter_Units	Confirm if needed	No
Laid_on	Confirm if needed	No
Status	Confirm if needed	No
Material	Confirm if needed	No
GID	Confirm if needed	No
Update_Date	Confirm if needed	No
Description	Confirm if needed	No
st_length(shape)	Confirm if needed	No

Sewer Gravity Main · Geospatial Evidence

Existing form reference: da848710feda4d8c

Field	Unit	Required
Line Name	Confirm if needed	No
Diameter	Confirm if needed	No
Diameter Units	Confirm if needed	No
Material	Confirm if needed	No
Slope	Confirm if needed	No
UpstreemIN	Confirm if needed	No
DownStreem	Confirm if needed	No
Laid on	Confirm if needed	No
Digitization from	Confirm if needed	No
Status	Confirm if needed	No
Units of Level	Confirm if needed	No
Gravity Type	Confirm if needed	No
GID	Confirm if needed	No
Update Date	Confirm if needed	No
st_length(shape)	Confirm if needed	No

Sewer Lateral Pipeline · Geospatial Evidence

Existing form reference: 062c4eb5c2ddc8b6

Field	Unit	Required
Pipe_Diameter_MM	Confirm if needed	No
Material	Confirm if needed	No
Buried_Depth_Meters	Confirm if needed	No
Laid_On	Confirm if needed	No
Digitization_from	Confirm if needed	No
Remarks	Confirm if needed	No
GID	Confirm if needed	No
Description	Confirm if needed	No
st_length(shape)	Confirm if needed	No

Occupied Housing Units by Grama Niladhari Division · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 8372d13713031913

Field	Unit	Required
Province Code	Confirm if needed	No
Province Name	Confirm if needed	No
District Code	Confirm if needed	No
District Name	Confirm if needed	No
DS_Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
DS_Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Number	Confirm if needed	No
Occupied Housing Units	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Information on Occupied Housing Units by Grama Niladhari Division, CPH-2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: e7e1c2657503020f

Field	Unit	Required
Province Code	Confirm if needed	No
Province Name	Confirm if needed	No
District Code	Confirm if needed	No
District Name	Confirm if needed	No
DS_Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
DS_Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Number	Confirm if needed	No
Occupied Housing Units	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Single house - single storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Single house - two storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Single house - more than two storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Attached house - 1st Floor	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Attached house - 2nd Floor	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Attached house - From 3 to 4 Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Attached house - From 5 to 10 Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Attached house - From 11to 19 Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Attached house - From 20 Floors or more	Confirm if needed	No
Type of Housing unit Structure / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Bricks	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Cement block	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Granite/ Cube stones	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Cabook	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Pressed soil bricks	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Warichchi / Mud	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Cadjan/ Palmyrah	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Planks/ Metal Sheets/ Asbestos	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Zink Aluminium Sheets	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Other (specify)	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Walls / Not relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Cement	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Terrazzo/Tile/Granite/Wood (Finished)	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Concrete	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Mud	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Wood	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Sand	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Other (specify)	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Floor / Not relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Tile	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Asbestos	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Concrete	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Zink Aluminium Sheet	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Metal Sheet	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Cadjan/ Palmyrah/ Straw	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Other (specify)	Confirm if needed	No
Principal material of construction of the Roof / Not relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Household Information by Grama Niladhari Division, CPH-2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: da744a0cfc8f5c9f

Field	Unit	Required
Province Code	Confirm if needed	No
Province Name	Confirm if needed	No
District Code	Confirm if needed	No
District Name	Confirm if needed	No
DS_Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
DS_Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Code	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Name	Confirm if needed	No
GN_Division Number	Confirm if needed	No
Number of Households	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Ground Water / Protected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Ground Water / Semi protected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Ground Water / Unprotected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Ground Water / Tube well	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Ground Water / Spring/ Fountain	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Pipe borne water - National water supply & drainage board	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Pipe borne water - Local Authority	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Pipe borne water - Community base organiziation	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Pipe borne water - Private water supply project	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Other / Tank/ River/Streams	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Other / Rain water	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Other / Bottled water	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Other / Filter water (R.O. Plant)	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Other / Bowser	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source/way of drinking water / Other / Other (specify)	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Fire wood	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Kerosene	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Electricity	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Saw dust/Paddy husk	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Bio gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Other (Specify bellow )	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Not relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of Lighting / Electricity - from National grid/rural hydro power project	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of Lighting / Kerosene lamp	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of Lighting / Solar power (grid connected)	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of Lighting / Solar power (stand alone)	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of Lighting / Bio gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of Lighting / Generator	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of Lighting / Other (Specify bellow )	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Within the unit / Within the housing unit - Exclusively for the household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Within the unit / Within the housing unit - Sharing with another household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Outside the unit / Within Premises - Exclusively for the household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Outside the unit / Within Premises - Sharing with another household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / No toilet but sharing with another housing unit/units	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / Common/ Public toilet	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / Not using a toilet (use jungle, beach and open ground)	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

GN Level Population by Sector, CPH 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: a96d28bdb2a7a507

Field	Unit	Required
District Code	Confirm if needed	No
District Name	Confirm if needed	No
DSD Code	Confirm if needed	No
DSD Name	persons	No
GND Code	Confirm if needed	No
GND Name	persons	No
Sector / Total	persons	No
Sector / Urban*	persons	No
Sector / Rural	persons	No
Sector / Estate Rural**	persons	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by housing unit structure at district level 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: a2103035c8ce0bac

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Single house - Single storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Single house - Two storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Single house - more than two storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Attached House - 1st Floor	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Attached House - 2nd Floor	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Attached House - 3rd or 4th Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Attached House - 5th to 10th Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Attached House - 11th to 19th Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Attached House - From 20th Floors or more	Confirm if needed	No
Structure of housing unit / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by main material used for walls construction at district level, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 41eb1069e9c9c17d

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Brick	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Cement block	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Granite/Cube stones	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Cabook	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Pressed soil bricks	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Mud/Warichchi	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Kadjan/ Palmyrah	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Plank/ Metal Sheet/Asbestos	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Zink Aluminium Sheets	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Not Relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by main material used for roof construction at district level, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 74f863b697ebe277

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Tile	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Asbestos	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Concrete	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Zink Aluminium Sheet	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Metal Sheet	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / cadjan/ Palmyrah/Straw	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Not Relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by main material used for floor construction at district level, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 78b642444e82761a

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Cement	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Terrazzo/Tile/Granite/Wood(finished)/Titanium	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Concrete	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Mud	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Wood	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Sand	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Other	Confirm if needed	No
நிலம் அமைப்பதற்குப் பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டுள்ள பிரதான பொருட்கள் Main material of construction of the floor / Not Relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households by main source of drinking water at district level, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: ef0674489fe2bdc3

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Protected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Semi Protected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Unprotected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Tube Well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Spring/Fountain	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / National Water Supply &drainage board	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Local Authority	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Community base Organiziation	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Private Water Supply Project	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Tank/River/Streams	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Rain Water	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Bottled water	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / மீள் வடிகட்டல் ஆலை (R.O. Plant) Filter water(R.O.plant)	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Bowser	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households by Main Source of EnergyFuel Used for Cooking at District, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 018e27b1cfd72a36

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Fire wood	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Kerosene	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Electricity	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Saw dust/Paddy husk	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Bio gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Not relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households by source of lighting at district level 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: d3aec442e748e54b

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Electricity - from National Grid / from rural electrification project	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Kerosene lamp	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Solar power (grid connected)	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Solar power (stand alone)	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Bio gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Generator	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households using toilet facilities at district level 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 1776b9ac25ff6b34

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Within the unit / Exclusively for the household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Within the unit / Sharing with another household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Outside the unit / Exclusively for the household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Outside the unit / Sharing with another household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / No toilet but sharing with another housing unit/ units	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / Common/ public toilet	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / Not using a toilet	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by housing unit structure at district level and Divisional Secretariat Divisions , 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 512d4139dfc4438e

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary Division	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Single house - Single storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Single house - two storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Single house - more than two storeyed	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Attached House - 1st Floor	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Attached House - 2nd Floor	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Attached House - 3rd or 4th Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Attached House - 5th to 10th Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Attached House - 11th to 19th Floors	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Attached House - From 20th Floors or more	Confirm if needed	No
Type of housing unit / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by main material used for walls construction at district level and Divisional Secretariat Divisions , 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 083d1e12fbf4e056

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary Division	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Brick	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Cement block	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Granite/Cube stones	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Cabook	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Pressed soil bricks	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Mud/Warichchi	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Kadjan/ Palmyrah	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Plank/ Metal Sheet/Asbestos	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Zink Aluminium Sheets	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the wall / Not Relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by main material used for roof construction at district level and Divisional Secretariat Divisions , 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: e1b26edc2e6a0e5e

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary Division	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Tile	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Asbestos	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Concrete	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Zink Aluminium Sheet	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Metal Sheet	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / cadjan/ Palmyrah/Straw	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the roof / Not Relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Housing units by main material used for floor construction at district level and Divisional Secretariat Divisions, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 9a5782101a90d9fe

Field	Unit	Required
District	Confirm if needed	No
Number of housing units	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Cement	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Terrazzo/Tile/Granite/Wood(finished)/Titanium	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Concrete	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Mud	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Wood	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Sand	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Main material of construction of the floor / Not Relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households by Main Source of EnergyFuel Used for Cooking at district level and Divisional Secretariat Divisions, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: dafbcc0869c20819

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary Division	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Fire wood	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Kerosene	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Electricity	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Saw dust/Paddy husk	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Bio gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Main Source of Energy/Fuel Used for Cooking / Not relavent	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households by main source of drinking water at district level and Divisional Secretariat Divisions, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: ce89abd871f197b0

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary Division	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Protected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Semi Protected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Unprotected well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Tube Well	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Ground Water / Spring/Fountain	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / National Water Supply &drainage board	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Local Authority	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Community base Organiziation	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Pipe Borne water / Private Water Supply Project	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Tank/River/Streams	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Rain Water	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Bottled water	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / மீள் வடிகட்டல் ஆலை (R.O. Plant) Filter water(R.O.plant)	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other / Bowser	Confirm if needed	No
Main source of drinking water / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households by source of lighting at district level and Divisional Secretariat Divisions , 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: bc8a342569a5c0ac

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary Division	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Electricity - from National Grid / from rural electrification project	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Kerosene lamp	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Solar power (grid connected)	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Solar power (stand alone)	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Bio gas	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Rural water supply project	Confirm if needed	No
Main type of lighting / Other	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

Households using toilet facilities at district level and divisional Secretariat Divisions, 2024 · Population & Households

Existing form reference: 2dbde244619e1052

Field	Unit	Required
District and Divisional Secretary Division	Confirm if needed	No
Number of households	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Within the unit / Exclusively for the household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Within the unit / Sharing with another household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Outside the unit / Exclusively for the household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Outside the unit / Sharing with another household	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / No toilet but sharing with another housing unit/ units	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / Common/ public toilet	Confirm if needed	No
Toilet facilities / Other / Not using a toilet	Confirm if needed	No
Geography level	Confirm if needed	No
Measure basis	Confirm if needed	No
Area label	Confirm if needed	No
Source row	Confirm if needed	No

FP124 financing · Programme Delivery

Existing form reference: e6af681e07c8efdc

Field	Unit	Required
Funding item	Confirm if needed	No
Instrument	Confirm if needed	No
Amount	USD	No
Currency	Confirm if needed	No
Date	Confirm if needed	No
Basis	Confirm if needed	No

5. Documents and images

Your institution has its own document and image library. Use the same library for reports, photos and other evidence.

Open this screen for Community-Based Organizations and NGOs See the presentation example

Community-Based Organizations and NGOs Documents and images prototype screen — Community-Based Organizations and NGOs. Prototype screen. Select the image to enlarge it.

What you can try

Open Documents and images. Check the institution name.
Use All files, Documents or Images to find a file. Open its preview or download the original.
Use a sample file to try Add file. Private is the starting choice. Public needs a source, permission to share and review.
Use Access preview to try the institution reviewer and Public visitor views.

Files added in the prototype stay in this browser. Public sharing is an access preview. Existing public reference links already work online.

What your institution needs to confirm

Does a separate library for your institution meet your needs?Should new files start as Private for the permitted institution team?Should Public access require a review of the file and sharing permission?What documents and images will you store? Give the file types, usual sizes and need for earlier versions.Which job roles may add files, read Private files and approve Public files?Which files must stay Private? What permission, licence or expiry rule is needed for Public files?What else should change in this library?

6. Data structure management

Data structure keeps the existing source tree, records, charts and map. Manage structure adds a place to propose changes to definitions.

Open this screen for Community-Based Organizations and NGOs See the presentation example

Community-Based Organizations and NGOs Data structure management prototype screen — Community-Based Organizations and NGOs. Prototype screen. Select the image to enlarge it.

What you can try

Open Data structure and choose Manage structure.
Use Add base domain for a main information area. Add inside creates a subject area, a nested subject, an entity type or a field under the right parent.
Give the definition a clear name, code and meaning. Reuse an existing definition when the meaning is the same.
For a field, check the data type, unit, required value, limits and missing-value rule. Save a Draft, then try the separate reviewer view.

An entity type means a kind of thing or event, such as a reservoir or an inspection. Drafts stay in this browser. A demo approval does not change real definitions, data, chart links or sharing rights.

What your institution needs to confirm

Do the existing main topics and subject areas match your institution’s work?Should definition changes stay Draft until the responsible reviewer checks them?Is it right to reuse the same entity type or field when its meaning is the same?Which main topics, subject areas, entity types or fields should we add or change?Which units, choices, limits, decimal places and missing-value rules must each new field use?Which job roles may edit definitions and review them? Who owns each main information area?When a meaning, unit or calculation changes, what review and version history does your institution need?

7. Users and access

User management shows example profiles for each institution. People and Roles and access let you review the proposed account screens.

Open this screen for Community-Based Organizations and NGOs See the presentation example

Community-Based Organizations and NGOs Users and access prototype screen — Community-Based Organizations and NGOs. Prototype screen. Select the image to enlarge it.

What you can try

Open User management and choose the institution. The rows are examples, not a list of your staff.
Use View access to check a role. An administrator title alone does not give access to Private files.
Try Preview invitation or Preview access change. Check the role, start date, optional end date and reason.
Review the example permissions and tell us which job roles should receive each one.

These are interface previews only. They create no account, send no email and change no access. Use example details in the preview. Institution verification does not grant a real permission.

What your institution needs to confirm

Do the proposed role names and responsibilities match your institution?Should access be limited to the assigned institution and the agreed dates?Should reading Private files need a separate permission, even for an administrator?Which job roles should view data, add files, review Public requests, edit definitions and manage users?Who should approve new access, set an end date or remove access when someone changes duties?Which user fields, roles or access checks are missing? Give role names rather than passwords or private account details.

9. Anything else we should change?

Which decisions or services are missing?Which forms or fields should change? Give the existing form reference where possible.What should change in the entry, checking, expert, map or report steps?Are the English, Sinhala and Tamil words clear? Give the screen name, current word and your suggested wording.Who should join the next review and what should happen next?

Use the Download answers button at the top of this page. Share the downloaded file or printed copy through your agreed review channel. Nothing is sent automatically.

Community-Based Organizations and NGOs

1. Check a decision

2. Try the inputs

3. Check each decision

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

Fictional worked example · 2025

4. Existing data forms for your institution

5. Documents and images

What you can try

What your institution needs to confirm

6. Data structure management

What you can try

What your institution needs to confirm

7. Users and access

What you can try

What your institution needs to confirm

8. Can you share data regularly?

9. Anything else we should change?