Workflow and chart checks

· Same SHARED review prototype

All 41 institutions and 820 decision examples were checked. The 164 earlier panel choices now open their matching decision examples. Chart titles, units, input fields and plotted values are checked together. Shared input forms reuse the existing entry, upload and review controls.

These are prototype checks. A clear chart and correct arithmetic do not prove that a method is suitable for real use. Institutions still confirm the input sources, definitions, methods, roles and operating rules. Real API/device connections, permanent server storage and formal acceptance need their own evidence.

Full journeys tested on screen

Journey	Result
Enter parameters → save draft → submit → review → accept → matching chart	Tested with sample paddy-stage values and source references.
Upload CSV → check columns → save correction → review → updated chart	The earlier accepted values remain until the correction is accepted.
CSV, Excel, JSON, XML and GeoJSON previews	The same fields and values pass validation. Unsafe XML and another institution’s decision reference are rejected.
Read PDF, Word or text → check suggested fields → human review	Original evidence is retained. Scans and malformed documents do not pretend to supply readable values.
Accepted inputs → calculated fields → report → saved run and export	Uses the accepted source version. Data origin and source reference remain with results.
Layer type → GeoJSON record → technical review → authorization → publication → map/export	Uses existing definitions and the same record identity. Internal records stay out of public preview.

Registered SRS workflows

All 49 local workflow model checks pass, within the existing total of 100 model checks. This table is not a claim that every real service or production condition is accepted.

Reference	Workflow	Local check
DP-UC01	Register dataset	Passed
DP-UC02	Provide information	Passed
DP-UC03	Update information	Passed
DP-UC04	Validate and review data	Passed
DP-UC05	Manage descriptive information	Passed
DP-UC06	Manage data access	Passed
DP-UC07	View submission status	Passed
DP-UC08	Respond to data requests	Passed
DP-UC09	Review data usage and feedback	Passed
DM-UC01	Identify and submit problem	Passed
DM-UC02	Access relevant information	Passed
DM-UC03	Analyse problem	Passed
DM-UC04	Compare management options	Passed
DM-UC05	Review recommendations	Passed
DM-UC06	Consult stakeholders	Passed
DM-UC07	Record selected decision	Passed
DM-UC08	Review and record approval	Passed
DM-UC09	View decision status	Passed
DM-UC10	Review outcomes	Passed
DI-UC01	View assigned decisions	Passed
DI-UC02	Review implementation information	Passed
DI-UC03	Assess implementation feasibility	Passed
DI-UC04	Prepare implementation plan	Passed
DI-UC05	Coordinate institutions	Passed
DI-UC06	Record approval conditions	Passed
DI-UC07	Update implementation progress	Passed
DI-UC08	Submit field evidence	Passed
DI-UC09	Review intervention outcomes	Passed
DI-UC10	Record corrective actions	Passed
BF-UC01	View local information	Passed
BF-UC02	Access climate and farming advice	Passed
BF-UC03	Explore market opportunities	Passed
BF-UC04	View support and training	Passed
BF-UC05	Request suitable options	Passed
BF-UC06	Submit problems and feedback	Passed
BF-UC07	Participate in consultation	Passed
BF-UC08	View project activities	Passed
BF-UC09	Access PES information	Passed
BF-UC10	View personal participation status	Passed
PM-UC01	View project dashboard	Passed
PM-UC02	View interventions on GIS	Passed
PM-UC03	Monitor activities and milestones	Passed
PM-UC04	Monitor KPIs and outcomes	Passed
PM-UC05	Review beneficiary coverage	Passed
PM-UC06	Compare intervention options	Passed
PM-UC07	Coordinate stakeholders	Passed
PM-UC08	Review risks and delays	Passed
PM-UC09	Record corrective actions	Passed
PM-UC10	Generate project reports	Passed

What each institution’s charts show

Open an institution below, or download the full CSV. Each decision keeps its existing reference. Sample examples are clearly labeled; accepted samples remain samples. Earlier saved examples and reports are retained.

Land Use Policy Planning Department · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Prioritize divisions with material land-use change	Land change — Comparable change	ha	ha	View chart
Refer proposed developments overlapping constraints	Development screening — Proposed footprint and constraint overlap	ha	%	View chart
Commission missing divisional land-use plans	Planning coverage — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Investigate field and map classification disagreements	Field verification — Source and verification comparison	ha	ha	View chart
Shortlist land uses compatible with local conditions	Agricultural suitability — Site-assessment evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Refer land-conversion applications for determination	Land conversion — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Compare candidate settlement expansion areas	Settlement planning — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Prioritize investigations of uncultivated suitable land	Idle land — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Flag proposed activities overlapping mapped wetlands	Wetland protection — Proposed footprint and constraint overlap	ha	%	View chart
Refer activities inside reviewed river reservations	Riparian protection — Proposed footprint and constraint overlap	ha	%	View chart
Resolve unresolved tenure objections before planning	Tenure conflicts — Invitations, responses and unresolved concerns	participants	%	View chart
Identify fragmented agricultural holdings for coordination	Fragmentation — Composition of recorded observations	records	records	View chart
Review loss of agricultural land to built development	Urban expansion — Comparable change	ha	ha	View chart
Compare access improvements for isolated planning areas	Service access — Feasible route alternatives	minutes	minutes	View chart
Compare restoration land-use alternatives	Restoration planning — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Target detailed soil-loss assessment in planning units	Land degradation — Illustrative sheet and rill soil loss	t/ha/year	t/ha/year	View chart
Investigate differences between planned and actual use	Plan implementation — Target and achieved value	ha	ha	View chart
Resolve outstanding planning consultations	Public consultation — Invitations, responses and unresolved concerns	participants	%	View chart
Correct incomplete land-use layer metadata	Map documentation — Source documentation	evidence items	%	View chart
Schedule priority land-use map updates	Survey scheduling — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart

Natural Resources Management Centre · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Select land units requiring erosion-control assessment	Erosion — Illustrative sheet and rill soil loss	t/ha/year	t/ha/year	View chart
Compare contouring mulching and cover-crop alternatives	Conservation treatments — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Allocate survey effort across reviewed erosion classes	Erosion classes — Composition of recorded observations	records	records	View chart
Select sites for comparable soil-carbon monitoring	Soil carbon — Illustrative soil-carbon stock	t C/ha	t C/ha	View chart
Refer nutrient and acidity limitations for agronomic advice	Soil fertility — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Prioritize investigations of salinity-affected land	Salinity — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Select plots needing compaction management assessment	Soil compaction — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Compare practices to improve infiltration and runoff control	Infiltration — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Shortlist suitable farm water-harvesting locations	Water harvesting — Site-assessment evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Select improvements for low water productivity	On-farm irrigation — Harvest output per irrigation water	kg/m³	kg/m³	View chart
Prioritize connected watershed conservation interventions	Watershed treatments — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Follow up incomplete conservation works	Conservation inspection — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Issue evidence packages for local agricultural advisories	Agroclimate advice — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Repair incomplete soil and weather observation coverage	Monitoring network — Scheduled and valid observations	observations	%	View chart
Review limiting soil and climate factors for proposed crops	Crop suitability — Site-assessment evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Evaluate conservation practice outcomes	Demonstration trials — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart
Compare conservation cost per verified treated hectare	Conservation economics — Operating cost composition	LKR	LKR	View chart
Refer suspect agricultural soil samples for investigation	Soil contamination — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Target conservation guidance where adoption is low	Technical dissemination — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Review reproducibility of soil and land assessments	Model assurance — Independent reproduction comparison	result units	result units	View chart

Department of Agriculture · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Plan seed support around observed rice-category uptake	Seed adoption — Composition of recorded observations	records	records	View chart
Target crop production costs requiring intervention	Production costs — Operating cost composition	LKR	LKR	View chart
Prepare crop-stage irrigation recommendations	Paddy water need and effective rainfall by crop stage	mm/stage	m³/stage	View chart
Adjust sowing guidance using observed planting progress	Planting guidance — Target and achieved value	ha	ha	View chart
Compare varieties against local agronomic constraints	Variety selection — Site-assessment evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Prioritize locations with low comparable crop productivity	Yield gaps — Harvest output per harvested area	kg/ha	kg/ha	View chart
Prioritize field investigation of unusual pest incidence	Pest surveillance — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Refer crop disease cases for diagnosis and control advice	Disease management — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Prioritize seed lots awaiting required tests	Seed certification — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Plan seed procurement against seasonal demand	Seed supply — Available stock and delivery commitments	stock units	stock units	View chart
Refer soil-test-based nutrient requirements for review	Fertilizer advice — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Review proposed pesticide use against current conditions	Pesticide stewardship — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Target extension services to unmet farmer needs	Extension delivery — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Select crop stages needing loss-reduction measures	Post-harvest loss — Batch input and saleable output	kg	%	View chart
Compare machinery service options for crop operations	Mechanization — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Compare crop enterprises under resource constraints	Crop diversification — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Identify crop enterprises with weak gross margins	Farm income — Enterprise gross margin	LKR	LKR	View chart
Assess yield change following documented weather events	Weather losses — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart
Follow up farmers who received technical guidance	Advisory effectiveness — Service cohort progression	cases	%	View chart
Select crop technologies for further validation	Research trials — Independent reproduction comparison	result units	result units	View chart

Department of Agrarian Development · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Target support to registered land not cultivated this season	Paddy utilization — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Review repeated farmer assistance before new allocation	Support overlap — Recorded support and possible overlaps	cases	%	View chart
Prioritize service areas with unmet crop water needs	Minor irrigation — Target and achieved value	m³	m³	View chart
Clear delayed farmer-service requests	Agrarian services — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Resolve conflicting parcel and cultivator records	Paddy register — Source and verification comparison	ha	ha	View chart
Refer unresolved cultivation-right disputes	Cultivation disputes — Invitations, responses and unresolved concerns	participants	%	View chart
Screen paddy conversion requests for formal determination	Land conversion — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Compare minor-tank rehabilitation alternatives	Tank rehabilitation — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Review organization registration and governance compliance	Farmer organizations — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Follow up unreconciled farmer-organization funds	Organization finance — Opening cash, receipts and payments	LKR	LKR	View chart
Prioritize verification of reported crop damage	Crop damage — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Refer complete subsidy applications for approval	Subsidy administration — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Plan timely distribution of approved farm inputs	Input distribution — Available stock and delivery commitments	stock units	stock units	View chart
Allocate staff to agrarian centres with workload gaps	Service centres — Required and usable capacity	service units	service units	View chart
Schedule communal minor-irrigation maintenance	Canal maintenance — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Improve representation in cultivation meetings	Farmer participation — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Refer encroachment concerns for field and legal review	Tank reservations — Proposed footprint and constraint overlap	ha	%	View chart
Review head-end and tail-end water-delivery differences	Irrigation equity — Target and achieved value	ha	ha	View chart
Schedule outdated farmer and land record checks	Registry updates — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Evaluate whether agrarian support improved cultivation	Service outcomes — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart

Irrigation Department · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Prepare additional irrigation allocation proposals	Paddy water need and effective rainfall by crop stage	mm/stage	m³/stage	View chart
Restore stale river and reservoir observations	Gauge operations — Scheduled and valid observations	observations	%	View chart
Prioritize canals with delivery shortfalls	Canal performance — Target and achieved value	m³	m³	View chart
Review storage consequences of proposed releases	Reservoir operation — Water balance components	m³	m³	View chart
Escalate dam inspection defects requiring engineering action	Dam safety — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Prepare response options from authorized hydrological evidence	Flood readiness — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Compare feasible drought water-allocation alternatives	Drought allocation — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Prioritize bathymetric surveys and desilting appraisal	Reservoir sedimentation — Comparable change	m³	m³	View chart
Prioritize repair packages within engineering and budget limits	Canal rehabilitation — Asset defects awaiting maintenance	days	days	View chart
Select drainage improvements for persistently waterlogged areas	Drainage — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Investigate saline intrusion affecting irrigated land	Salinity exclusion — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Schedule approved gate operations without conflicts	Gate scheduling — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Target schemes with low crop output per water delivered	Water productivity — Harvest output per delivered water	kg/m³	kg/m³	View chart
Flag proposed releases inconsistent with reviewed flow conditions	Environmental flows — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Require reproducible calibration before model use	Hydrological models — Independent reproduction comparison	result units	result units	View chart
Compare energy performance of lift-irrigation stations	Pumping systems — Delivered water per pump energy	m³/kWh	m³/kWh	View chart
Appraise reservoir rehabilitation cash-flow alternatives	Rehabilitation investment — Illustrative investment appraisal	LKR	LKR	View chart
Investigate delayed irrigation construction milestones	Construction delivery — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Prevent shortages of critical irrigation equipment spares	Spare parts — Available stock and delivery commitments	stock units	stock units	View chart
Correct missing metadata in published reservoir information	Public information — Source documentation	evidence items	%	View chart

Mahaweli Authority of Sri Lanka · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Review cropping plans against calculated water requirements	Crop water need and effective rainfall by crop stage	mm/stage	m³/stage	View chart
Correct system-level water-delivery shortfalls	Water delivery — Target and achieved value	m³	m³	View chart
Review linked-reservoir storage and transfer scenarios	Reservoir networks — Water balance components	m³	m³	View chart
Restore stale data feeds used in seasonal planning	Planning evidence — Scheduled and valid observations	observations	%	View chart
Compare agriculture energy and domestic-water allocations	Multi-sector allocation — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Prioritize demand-management options during shortages	Drought response — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Refer agricultural and commercial land requests for approval	Land allocation — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Review proposed uses against approved system plans	Land conversion — Proposed footprint and constraint overlap	ha	%	View chart
Investigate activities within tank and canal reservations	Reservation protection — Proposed footprint and constraint overlap	ha	%	View chart
Target livelihood support to uncovered eligible settlers	Farmer livelihoods — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Identify systems with low agricultural water productivity	System productivity — Harvest output per delivered water	kg/m³	kg/m³	View chart
Compare alternative cropping patterns for system plans	Crop diversification — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Prioritize Mahaweli infrastructure maintenance	Irrigation assets — Asset defects awaiting maintenance	days	days	View chart
Plan service capacity for settlement growth	Settlement services — Required and usable capacity	service units	service units	View chart
Select riparian and catchment restoration alternatives	Environmental restoration — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Review reservoir-use conflicts involving fisheries	Aquaculture coordination — Invitations, responses and unresolved concerns	participants	%	View chart
Prepare coordinated operating options during high inflows	Flood operations — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Escalate delayed system-development milestones	Investment delivery — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Resolve objections to system development proposals	Public consultation — Invitations, responses and unresolved concerns	participants	%	View chart
Reconcile inconsistent land and water system codes	System reporting — Vocabulary mapping coverage	source concepts	source concepts	View chart

Forest Department · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Investigate comparable forest-cover changes	Forest cover — Comparable change	ha	ha	View chart
Prioritize forest plots missing structural measurements	Forest inventory — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Target maintenance to poorly surviving planting cohorts	Restoration survival — Establishment and survival	plants	%	View chart
Assign unresolved forest-disturbance investigations	Forest alerts — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Prioritize fire prevention and preparedness locations	Fire preparedness — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Refer suspected forest encroachment for verification	Encroachment — Proposed footprint and constraint overlap	ha	%	View chart
Compare assisted regeneration and planting alternatives	Restoration selection — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Shortlist restoration species suited to site conditions	Species selection — Site-assessment evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Plan seedling production for approved planting demand	Nursery supply — Available stock and delivery commitments	stock units	stock units	View chart
Review seed and seedling provenance before deployment	Seed provenance — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Prioritize invasive-species control and follow-up	Invasive plants — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Prioritize forest catchments needing conservation action	Watershed protection — Illustrative sheet and rill soil loss	t/ha/year	t/ha/year	View chart
Review inventory evidence for carbon-stock estimates	Forest carbon — Comparable carbon-stock scenario	t C/ha	t C	View chart
Address gaps in community forestry participation	Community forestry — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Refer complete timber-use cases for formal determination	Timber authorization — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Schedule silvicultural work by stand condition	Plantation management — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Compare visitor demand with safe site capacity	Ecotourism — Required and usable capacity	service units	service units	View chart
Select comparable forest biodiversity surveys	Biodiversity monitoring — Observed richness and survey effort	observed species	observed species	View chart
Compare feasible patrol coverage routes	Patrol deployment — Feasible route alternatives	minutes	minutes	View chart
Correct inconsistent forest and compartment classifications	Forest records — Vocabulary mapping coverage	source concepts	source concepts	View chart

Department of Meteorology · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Prepare reviewed rainfall-anomaly evidence	Rainfall anomalies — Monthly rainfall and comparable baseline	mm	mm	View chart
Identify prolonged rainfall spells requiring advisory review	Dry and wet spells — Daily rainfall and spell evidence	mm	mm	View chart
Prioritize stations with incomplete observations	Station completeness — Scheduled and valid observations	observations	%	View chart
Determine where historical rainfall supports SPI analysis	Drought monitoring — Rainfall evidence for drought review	mm	mm	View chart
Investigate unusual maximum and minimum temperatures	Temperature extremes — Daily maximum temperature and baseline	°C	°C	View chart
Prepare official-warning review cases from accepted observations	Severe weather — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Review forecast errors before operational changes	Forecast verification — Forecast and verifying observation	mm	mm	View chart
Assess seasonal forecast performance across past seasons	Seasonal forecasts — Forecast and verifying observation	mm	mm	View chart
Select candidate locations for observation-network expansion	Station siting — Site-assessment evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Schedule calibration and repair of weather instruments	Instrument maintenance — Asset defects awaiting maintenance	days	days	View chart
Identify time series affected by station or instrument changes	Data homogenization — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Prioritize agricultural advisories by crop exposure	Agrometeorology — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Assess weather-input fitness for agricultural water estimates	Evapotranspiration — Source documentation	evidence items	%	View chart
Refer marine forecast exceptions for specialist review	Marine services — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Prioritize aviation meteorological service interruptions	Aviation services — Scheduled service and downtime	hours	%	View chart
Target awareness using verified lightning-risk evidence	Lightning exposure — Proposed footprint and constraint overlap	ha	%	View chart
Review long-term trends in homogeneous station records	Climate trends — Annual rainfall by observation period	mm/year	mm/year	View chart
Investigate disagreement between nearby and reference sensors	Observation reconciliation — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Clear delayed requests for permitted climate data	Climate requests — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Check source rights and approval before publishing products	Forecast publication — Access-permission review	requests	requests	View chart

Department of Export Agriculture · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Target export crops with weak enterprise returns	Crop economics — Enterprise gross margin	LKR	LKR	View chart
Prioritize feasible export-crop market development	Market opportunities — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Select processing stages with excessive spice losses	Post-harvest quality — Batch input and saleable output	kg	%	View chart
Prioritize crop-area combinations with weak productivity	Crop productivity — Harvest output per mature harvested area	kg/ha	kg/ha	View chart
Shortlist export crops suited to local soils and climate	Crop suitability — Site-assessment evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Plan certified planting-material supply	Planting materials — Available stock and delivery commitments	stock units	stock units	View chart
Investigate emerging export-crop pest and disease patterns	Plant health — Observed and baseline comparison	ha	ha	View chart
Refer spice quality results outside applicable specifications	Quality compliance — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Compare rehabilitation and replanting of ageing crop stands	Replanting — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Target export-crop growers lacking technical support	Extension coverage — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Review grower evidence for requested certification	Certification readiness — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Appraise investments in grading drying and processing	Value addition — Illustrative investment appraisal	LKR	LKR	View chart
Resolve broken links from export-crop lots to farms	Traceability — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Compare harvest windows against quality and market constraints	Harvest timing — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Compare shade water and soil adaptation practices	Climate adaptation — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Verify establishment outcomes after crop-development assistance	Subsidy follow-up — Establishment and survival	plants	%	View chart
Select export-crop research questions with evidence gaps	Research priorities — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Prioritize erosion control in sloping export-crop lands	Soil conservation — Illustrative sheet and rill soil loss	t/ha/year	t/ha/year	View chart
Reconcile inconsistent crop names and varieties	Grower records — Vocabulary mapping coverage	source concepts	source concepts	View chart
Evaluate export-crop support outcomes beyond participation	Programme evaluation — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart

Provincial Departments of Agriculture · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Target district-specific rice variety extension	Variety adoption — Composition of recorded observations	records	records	View chart
Allocate support by rainfed and irrigated cultivation needs	Irrigation classes — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Investigate high local farm production costs	Input costs — Operating cost composition	LKR	LKR	View chart
Adjust extension schedules to planting progress	Sowing progress — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Address differences between crop targets and accepted output	Provincial production — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Prioritize local pest investigation visits	Pest response — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Redistribute extension effort where service demand exceeds capacity	Extension staffing — Required and usable capacity	service units	service units	View chart
Match approved seasonal seed demand to valid stocks	Seed distribution — Available stock and delivery commitments	stock units	stock units	View chart
Schedule sampling where fertilizer advice lacks evidence	Soil testing — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Select comparable sites for technology demonstrations	Demonstration farms — Site-assessment evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Follow up training participants reaching verified adoption	Training outcomes — Service cohort progression	cases	%	View chart
Prioritize verification of provincial crop-loss reports	Crop damage — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Plan shared machinery services for uncovered farming areas	Mechanization access — Required and usable capacity	service units	service units	View chart
Compare irrigation-management practices on equivalent farms	Water-saving practices — Harvest output per irrigation water	kg/m³	kg/m³	View chart
Shortlist locally viable alternative crop programmes	Diversification — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Prioritize vegetable and fruit post-harvest support	Horticulture — Batch input and saleable output	kg	%	View chart
Reconcile provincial agriculture funding and verified activities	Budget delivery — Approved budget, commitments and payments	LKR	LKR	View chart
Address underserved smallholder and vulnerable farmer groups	Service inclusion — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Correct differences between district crop returns	Reporting consistency — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Evaluate provincial agricultural programmes	Provincial outcomes — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart

Project Management Unit · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Prioritize project outputs awaiting independent verification	Output verification — Service cohort progression	cases	%	View chart
Investigate spending ahead of verified physical progress	Delivery performance — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Resolve source reviews blocking required project reports	Reporting bottlenecks — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Coordinate overlapping interventions at the same sites	Intervention overlap — Recorded support and possible overlaps	cases	%	View chart
Compare work-plan alternatives within programme constraints	Annual planning — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Identify unfunded activities and unfulfilled co-financing	Funding commitments — Approved budget, commitments and payments	LKR	LKR	View chart
Prioritize procurements on the implementation critical path	Procurement scheduling — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Escalate contract milestone delays and unresolved deliverables	Contract performance — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Refer unresolved environmental and social risks	Safeguards — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Escalate overdue programme grievances through approved channels	Grievances — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Target gaps in access to project benefits	Participation equity — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Compare material scope-change alternatives before approval	Change control — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Block affected work with unmet mandatory approval conditions	Decision conditions — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Resolve dependency conflicts between implementing partners	Partner coordination — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Assess verified programme outcomes and attribution limits	Outcome evaluation — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart
Compare financial consequences of implementation scenarios	Risk financing — Illustrative investment appraisal	LKR	LKR	View chart
Identify assets lacking verified maintenance and ownership arrangements	Asset handover — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Select interventions for further testing or scaling	Learning and scaling — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Correct incomplete references in reporting evidence packages	Evidence catalogue — Source documentation	evidence items	%	View chart
Resolve outstanding financial technical and safeguard obligations	Project closure — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart

CIFOR-ICRAF and Research Partners · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Prioritize ecosystem types with comparable extent or condition decline	Ecosystem change — Comparable mapped ecosystem extent	ha	ha	View chart
Select comparable soil-carbon monitoring locations	Soil-carbon monitoring — Illustrative soil-carbon stock	t C/ha	t C/ha	View chart
Improve surveys with insufficient sampling effort	Biodiversity evidence — Observed richness and survey effort	observed species	observed species	View chart
Select defensible evidence for forest-carbon assessment	Forest-carbon estimates — Comparable carbon-stock scenario	t C/ha	t C	View chart
Compare landscape restoration opportunities	Landscape restoration — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Compare locally suitable tree-crop combinations	Agroforestry design — Site-assessment evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Select study designs capable of answering intervention questions	Research design — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart
Allocate field effort across environmental strata	Sampling allocation — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Resolve incompatible ecological concepts before combining datasets	Data harmonization — Vocabulary mapping coverage	source concepts	source concepts	View chart
Require independent validation of landscape models	Model validation — Independent reproduction comparison	result units	result units	View chart
Assess whether land-management changes affect water outcomes	Hydrological evidence — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart
Prepare separate physical service accounts	Ecosystem services — Physical ecosystem-service account	physical service units	physical service units	View chart
Compare livelihood conservation and water-management alternatives	Trade-offs — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Prioritize measurements driving carbon-estimate uncertainty	Carbon uncertainty — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Resolve conflicting scientific and community observations	Community knowledge — Invitations, responses and unresolved concerns	participants	%	View chart
Review whose knowledge and outcomes research represents	Gender and inclusion — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Sustain observation coverage beyond initial field campaigns	Long-term monitoring — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Determine which research outputs can be shared	Open science — Access-permission review	requests	requests	View chart
Prioritize evidence products requested by decision makers	Knowledge products — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Evaluate uptake and consequences of research recommendations	Research translation — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart

Sub-Watershed Integrated Delivery Teams · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Follow up assignments lacking accepted field evidence	Field assignments — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Schedule visits to unobserved monitoring sites	Monitoring coverage — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Prioritize unresolved community cases by agreed urgency	Community cases — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Resolve missing or conflicting locations of field activities	Spatial verification — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Compare community priorities for sub-watershed actions	Watershed plans — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Coordinate field works around seasonal and resource limits	Intervention scheduling — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Target visits to restoration cohorts with uncertain survival	Restoration follow-up — Establishment and survival	plants	%	View chart
Verify completed soil and water conservation treatments	Conservation works — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Refer local water-shortage evidence to responsible institutions	Water problems — Target and achieved value	households	households	View chart
Follow up adoption after field demonstrations	Farmer practice uptake — Service cohort progression	cases	%	View chart
Escalate verified hazard observations to competent authorities	Local hazards — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Redistribute assignments where field workload exceeds capacity	Team workload — Required and usable capacity	service units	service units	View chart
Check safeguards before starting field interventions	Safeguard conditions — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Plan shared field equipment and supply availability	Equipment logistics — Available stock and delivery commitments	stock units	stock units	View chart
Resolve objections to sub-watershed implementation plans	Community consultation — Invitations, responses and unresolved concerns	participants	%	View chart
Investigate deviations from agreed field work plans	Progress exceptions — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Select feasible routes for field monitoring visits	Access routes — Feasible route alternatives	minutes	minutes	View chart
Review overlapping field support to the same participants	Support duplication — Recorded support and possible overlaps	cases	%	View chart
Correct incomplete field records before review	Field form quality — Source documentation	evidence items	%	View chart
Assess whether completed interventions improved local outcomes	Local outcomes — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart

Survey Department · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Select the authoritative survey edition for a case	Boundary selection — Source documentation	evidence items	%	View chart
Investigate differences in registered and surveyed parcel area	Parcel reconciliation — Source and verification comparison	ha	ha	View chart
Identify terrain requiring detailed site survey	Terrain screening — Proposed footprint and constraint overlap	ha	%	View chart
Prioritize features needing ground verification	Field verification — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Prioritize pending cadastral survey requests	Cadastral backlog — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Schedule geodetic control inspection and restoration	Control network — Asset defects awaiting maintenance	days	days	View chart
Validate transformations before combining spatial datasets	Coordinate transformation — Independent reproduction comparison	result units	result units	View chart
Refer surveys failing approved accuracy specifications	Survey accuracy — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Schedule aerial imagery for priority mapping gaps	Aerial acquisition — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Support formal review of conflicting boundary evidence	Boundary disputes — Invitations, responses and unresolved concerns	participants	%	View chart
Prioritize map sheets with significant feature changes	Topographic updates — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Check required access and survey approvals	Survey permissions — Access-permission review	requests	requests	View chart
Select elevation datasets fit for intended analysis	Elevation products — Source documentation	evidence items	%	View chart
Identify areas needing authoritative boundary re-establishment	Encroachment surveys — Proposed footprint and constraint overlap	ha	%	View chart
Balance crew instrument and travel requirements	Survey resources — Required and usable capacity	service units	service units	View chart
Track survey products through independent checking	Map delivery — Service cohort progression	cases	%	View chart
Resolve inconsistent parcel identifiers across institutions	Land information — Vocabulary mapping coverage	source concepts	source concepts	View chart
Compare costs for equivalent survey work types	Survey cost — Operating cost composition	LKR	LKR	View chart
Clear delayed requests for permitted map products	Map distribution — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Retain superseded survey editions with traceable revisions	Historical integrity — Independent reproduction comparison	result units	result units	View chart

National Spatial Data Infrastructure · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Prioritize unavailable GIS services by user need	Published services — Scheduled service and downtime	hours	%	View chart
Request updates for outdated source metadata	Metadata currency — Scheduled and valid observations	observations	%	View chart
Resolve conflicting classifications between publishers	Semantic conflicts — Vocabulary mapping coverage	source concepts	source concepts	View chart
Restrict products using withdrawn source permissions	Withdrawn rights — Access-permission review	requests	requests	View chart
Check institutional agreements before publishing a source	Service onboarding — Access-permission review	requests	requests	View chart
Reject unverified spatial-reference transformations	Coordinate standards — Independent reproduction comparison	result units	result units	View chart
Prioritize gaps in fundamental geospatial datasets	National coverage — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Route invalid or inconsistent geometries for correction	Geometry quality — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Identify GIS endpoints missing approved response targets	Service performance — Scheduled service and downtime	hours	%	View chart
Review downstream effects of source schema revisions	Schema changes — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Identify products lacking traceable source versions	Data lineage — Source documentation	evidence items	%	View chart
Consolidate duplicate catalogue references without copying data	Duplicate catalogues — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Determine safe access and aggregation for restricted layers	Sensitive layers — Access-permission review	requests	requests	View chart
Prioritize services failing documented exchange requirements	Interoperability — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Assign source-feed failures to accountable custodians	Incident response — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Coordinate shared-layer refreshes with consumers	Update scheduling — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Improve discovery of poorly described geospatial resources	Catalogue discovery — Source documentation	evidence items	%	View chart
Verify cross-agency joins before publishing combined analyses	Spatial joins — Independent reproduction comparison	result units	result units	View chart
Prioritize dataset requests using recorded service demand	Usage requests — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Test recovery of essential catalogue and service metadata	Disaster resilience — Scheduled service and downtime	hours	%	View chart

Disaster Management Centre · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Prioritize districts with verified disaster impacts	Affected households — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Direct sector assessments where losses are greatest	Damage and loss — Operating cost composition	LKR	LKR	View chart
Address safe-centre capacity and accessibility gaps	Safe centres — Required and usable capacity	service units	service units	View chart
Target documented recovery needs lacking confirmed funding	Recovery funding — Approved budget, commitments and payments	LKR	LKR	View chart
Identify communities missing authorized warnings	Warning dissemination — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Compare feasible evacuation routes and shelter access	Evacuation planning — Feasible route alternatives	minutes	minutes	View chart
Allocate response resources against assessed needs	Emergency resources — Required and usable capacity	service units	service units	View chart
Review overlapping or missing relief deliveries	Relief distribution — Recorded support and possible overlaps	cases	%	View chart
Prevent critical shortages in emergency stores	Relief stocks — Available stock and delivery commitments	stock units	stock units	View chart
Resolve failures identified during preparedness exercises	Preparedness drills — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Compare mitigation proposals for exposed communities	Risk reduction — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Prioritize schools hospitals and utilities for risk assessment	Critical facilities — Proposed footprint and constraint overlap	ha	%	View chart
Identify areas awaiting reliable rapid damage assessments	Rapid assessments — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Resolve incompatible assignments across response agencies	Response coordination — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Escalate delayed reconstruction and rehabilitation work	Recovery progress — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Review changing disaster impacts across comparable events	Impact trends — Recorded affected households by observation period	households	households	View chart
Check whether local contingency plans remain usable	Contingency plans — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Verify authority and validity before publishing alerts	Public information — Access-permission review	requests	requests	View chart
Assess response effectiveness and unintended consequences	Response evaluation — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart
Reconcile duplicate disaster incident reports	Incident records — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart

National Building Research Organisation · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Refer proposed sites overlapping landslide hazard zones	Site clearance — Proposed footprint and constraint overlap	ha	%	View chart
Prioritize zones with outdated or incomplete hazard evidence	Hazard-map updates — Source documentation	evidence items	%	View chart
Prioritize exposed assets for site-specific investigation	Asset exposure — Proposed footprint and constraint overlap	ha	%	View chart
Investigate rainfall patterns associated with landslides	Rainfall investigations — Daily rainfall by observation period	mm/day	mm/day	View chart
Escalate observed cracks movement and drainage defects	Slope inspections — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Repair failed landslide-monitoring instruments	Monitoring systems — Scheduled and valid observations	observations	%	View chart
Compare engineering mitigation alternatives	Slope stabilization — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Refer relocation alternatives for competent determination	Relocation assessment — Invitations, responses and unresolved concerns	participants	%	View chart
Verify compliance with site-clearance conditions	Construction conditions — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Resolve conflicting ground-investigation results	Geotechnical evidence — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Prepare technical review of landslide-warning conditions	Early warning evidence — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Prioritize delayed geotechnical testing requests	Laboratory workload — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Prioritize assessment of unstable road cuts	Road slopes — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Schedule investigations after reported slope failures	Post-event inspection — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Compare options to reduce slope-related drainage problems	Drainage remediation — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Require validation of landslide susceptibility models	Model validation — Independent reproduction comparison	result units	result units	View chart
Evaluate stabilization performance after completion	Mitigation outcomes — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart
Identify developments needing additional terrain investigation	Land-use advice — Site-assessment evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Target exposed communities missing preparedness guidance	Community awareness — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Clear incomplete landslide assessment applications	Case administration — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart

Central Environmental Authority · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Investigate water samples exceeding applicable limits	Water pollution — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Prioritize river stretches lacking recent samples	Sampling coverage — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Follow up unverified environmental mitigation obligations	Mitigation compliance — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Investigate unusual changes in water-quality observations	Water anomalies — Observed and baseline comparison	mg/L	mg/L	View chart
Refer complete license applications to the competent authority	Environmental licensing — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Prioritize licenses nearing expiry with unresolved conditions	License renewal — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Screen project proposals for required assessment pathways	Environmental assessment — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Investigate measured air-quality departures from applicable limits	Air pollution — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Prioritize investigation of evidence-supported noise complaints	Noise complaints — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Target facilities with unresolved effluent-control failures	Industrial effluent — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Compare waste collection treatment and disposal options	Waste management — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Review traceability of hazardous-waste transfers	Hazardous waste — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Refer development pressure overlapping protected wetland evidence	Wetland conservation — Proposed footprint and constraint overlap	ha	%	View chart
Escalate unresolved pollution complaints	Public complaints — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Schedule inspections by approved pollution-risk priorities	Inspection targeting — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Coordinate investigation of reported pollution incidents	Incident response — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Target awareness programmes to documented compliance gaps	Environmental education — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Assess environmental recovery after remedial works	Restoration outcomes — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart
Review sample custody and analytical validity before action	Laboratory evidence — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Harmonize classifications without altering source meanings	Environmental records — Vocabulary mapping coverage	source concepts	source concepts	View chart

Department of Wildlife Conservation · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Improve comparable biodiversity surveys in protected areas	Survey coverage — Observed richness and survey effort	observed species	observed species	View chart
Prioritize unresolved wildlife conflict and rescue cases	Wildlife incidents — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Identify threatened-species habitats requiring protection review	Habitat exposure — Proposed footprint and constraint overlap	ha	%	View chart
Refer candidate conservation actions for specialist threat assessment	Threat reduction — Evidence required for specialist STAR appraisal	evidence items	%	View chart
Compare locally evidenced coexistence interventions	Human-elephant conflict — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Prioritize defects in approved protective fences	Fence maintenance — Asset defects awaiting maintenance	days	days	View chart
Review proposed activities affecting habitat connectivity	Wildlife corridors — Proposed footprint and constraint overlap	ha	%	View chart
Assign verified illegal-activity observations for authorized investigation	Poaching response — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Compare patrol routes for permitted priority areas	Patrol coverage — Feasible route alternatives	minutes	minutes	View chart
Select invasive-species management priorities	Invasive species — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Review visitor pressure against approved protected-area capacity	Visitor management — Required and usable capacity	service units	service units	View chart
Check research proposals against current permit requirements	Research permissions — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Determine safe release of wildlife location data	Sensitive information — Access-permission review	requests	requests	View chart
Compare restoration actions for degraded wildlife habitats	Habitat restoration — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Review population trends using comparable survey effort	Population monitoring — Observed richness and survey effort	observed species	observed species	View chart
Refer unusual mortality or illness clusters to specialists	Wildlife health — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Allocate licensed rescue resources against current demand	Rescue capacity — Required and usable capacity	service units	service units	View chart
Target conflict-affected communities lacking support	Community outreach — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Evaluate conservation outcomes and adverse effects	Conservation effectiveness — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart
Resolve conflicting protected-area and habitat labels	Protected-area records — Vocabulary mapping coverage	source concepts	source concepts	View chart

Department of Census and Statistics · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Identify crop variety and irrigation patterns needing analysis	Agricultural patterns — Survey observations and final weights	observed units	observed units	View chart
Select defensible geographic poverty and income comparisons	Poverty reporting — Survey observations and final weights	observed units	observed units	View chart
Determine whether estimates support district or divisional reporting	Small-area reporting — Survey observations and final weights	observed units	observed units	View chart
Identify publications affected by revised statistical series	Statistical revisions — Comparable change	ha	ha	View chart
Compare survey designs against precision and cost requirements	Survey design — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Target follow-up where survey response is incomplete	Nonresponse — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Resolve duplicate or missing units in statistical frames	Frame quality — Source and verification comparison	households	households	View chart
Correct inconsistent responses before statistical acceptance	Questionnaire quality — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Allocate enumerators to achieve survey coverage	Field deployment — Required and usable capacity	service units	service units	View chart
Review disclosure risk before publishing statistical tables	Confidentiality — Access-permission review	requests	requests	View chart
Determine whether series can be compared across revisions	Method comparability — Source documentation	evidence items	%	View chart
Prioritize delayed statistical releases and dependencies	Release scheduling — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Reconcile crop area yield and production estimates	Crop estimates — Survey observations and final weights	observed units	observed units	View chart
Investigate unusual observations before index compilation	Price statistics — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Review geographic differences using comparable labour definitions	Labour statistics — Survey observations and final weights	observed units	observed units	View chart
Identify population changes requiring denominator updates	Demographic change — Comparable change	people	people	View chart
Assess administrative datasets before statistical reuse	Administrative sources — Source documentation	evidence items	%	View chart
Prioritize permitted requests for statistical extracts	Data access services — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Independently reproduce published estimates and revisions	Reproducible estimates — Independent reproduction comparison	result units	result units	View chart
Resolve unmapped economic agricultural and geographic codes	Classification maintenance — Vocabulary mapping coverage	source concepts	source concepts	View chart

Water Resources Board · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Investigate wells showing sustained drawdown	Groundwater depletion — Depth to groundwater below the stated ground datum by observation period	m below ground	m below ground	View chart
Adjust monitoring to seasonal groundwater variation	Seasonal groundwater — Groundwater depth and seasonal baseline	m below datum	m below datum	View chart
Investigate wells exceeding applicable use-specific limits	Groundwater quality — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Select groundwater areas needing observation wells	Monitoring coverage — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Shortlist sites requiring detailed groundwater investigation	Borehole siting — Site-assessment evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Refer pumping-test results for safe-abstraction assessment	Pumping tests — Independent reproduction comparison	result units	result units	View chart
Compare recorded abstraction with reviewed aquifer budgets	Abstraction balance — Water balance components	m³	m³	View chart
Investigate contamination sources near supply wells	Well protection — Proposed footprint and constraint overlap	ha	%	View chart
Prioritize coastal groundwater salinity investigations	Saline intrusion — Groundwater electrical conductivity by observation period	µS/cm	µS/cm	View chart
Refer industrial groundwater requests for determination	Industrial abstraction — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Compare managed-recharge alternatives	Recharge options — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Investigate groundwater changes around extraction sites	Mining impacts — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart
Prioritize rehabilitation of poorly performing wells	Well rehabilitation — Asset defects awaiting maintenance	days	days	View chart
Clear delayed groundwater laboratory analyses	Laboratory turnaround — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Compare feasible groundwater contingency supplies	Drought supply — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Review unsuccessful drilling and cost patterns	Drilling performance — Successful boreholes per drilled boreholes	%	%	View chart
Restore failed groundwater loggers and calibration	Monitoring devices — Scheduled and valid observations	observations	%	View chart
Prepare permitted groundwater information releases	Public evidence — Access-permission review	requests	requests	View chart
Validate aquifer-model predictions before planning use	Aquifer models — Independent reproduction comparison	result units	result units	View chart
Resolve inconsistent well identifiers and construction metadata	Well registry — Source documentation	evidence items	%	View chart

National Water Supply and Drainage Board · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Prioritize systems with large unexplained water balances	Non-revenue water — Illustrative utility water balance	m³	m³	View chart
Target leakage investigations by service area	Leakage management — Illustrative utility water balance	m³	m³	View chart
Prioritize underserved areas for water-service appraisal	Service expansion — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Refer treated-water results outside applicable limits	Water quality — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Prioritize source-to-consumer hazards and controls	Water safety planning — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Compare peak demand with usable treatment capacity	Treatment capacity — Required and usable capacity	service units	service units	View chart
Investigate pressure outside reviewed operating conditions	Pressure management — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Prioritize pipe rehabilitation using verified asset condition	Pipe replacement — Asset defects awaiting maintenance	days	days	View chart
Select pumping systems for energy-efficiency appraisal	Pump efficiency — Delivered water per pump energy	m³/kWh	m³/kWh	View chart
Schedule verification of suspect customer and bulk meters	Meter replacement — Asset defects awaiting maintenance	days	days	View chart
Address recurrent and prolonged supply outages	Supply interruptions — Scheduled service and downtime	hours	%	View chart
Compare alternative sources under seasonal stress	Source security — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Prioritize delayed service-connection applications	Connection requests — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Escalate unresolved water and sanitation complaints	Customer complaints — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Prevent treatment interruptions from chemical shortages	Chemical supply — Available stock and delivery commitments	stock units	stock units	View chart
Investigate effluent performance against permit conditions	Wastewater treatment — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Prioritize investigation of sewer overflow risks	Sewer overflows — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Compare water-service investment alternatives	Capital investments — Illustrative investment appraisal	LKR	LKR	View chart
Target support to poorly functioning community water schemes	Community systems — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Resolve inconsistent asset and customer service-area references	Network records — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart

Geological Survey and Mines Bureau · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Refer proposed sites overlapping geological constraints	Geological constraints — Proposed footprint and constraint overlap	ha	%	View chart
Commission geological mapping in poorly covered catchments	Mapping coverage — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Select parcels requiring detailed geological investigation	Site investigation — Site-assessment evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Reassess site screening after geological-map changes	Map revisions — Comparable change	ha	ha	View chart
Refer complete mining applications for authorized determination	Mining licenses — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Investigate extraction differing from authorized quantities	Extraction monitoring — Target and achieved value	m³	m³	View chart
Verify rehabilitation obligations before closure review	Mine rehabilitation — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Identify extraction proposals needing hydrological and ecological review	River sand — Proposed footprint and constraint overlap	ha	%	View chart
Investigate documented quarry effects on nearby receptors	Quarry impacts — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Refer suspected unlicensed extraction for investigation	Illegal extraction — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Prioritize exploration using evidence and feasibility constraints	Mineral resources — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Review mining proposals affecting groundwater systems	Groundwater interactions — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Prioritize pending mineral and material analyses	Laboratory services — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Resolve analytical discrepancies before resource assessment	Sample integrity — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Check mineral transport documents against authorized sources	Transport permissions — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Schedule inspections according to approved risk priorities	Mine inspections — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Investigate differences in extraction-related payable and recorded receipts	Revenue reconciliation — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Escalate verified geohazard concerns to relevant specialists	Geohazard evidence — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Require reproducible mineral-resource estimation evidence	Resource estimates — Independent reproduction comparison	result units	result units	View chart
Improve discoverability and provenance of geological records	Geological catalogue — Source documentation	evidence items	%	View chart

Land Commissioner General's Department · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Prioritize unresolved state-land applications	Land applications — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Schedule lease and permit reviews before due dates	Lease reviews — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Target gaps in state-land record digitization	Digitization — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Address delays in administrative land requests	Processing performance — Service cohort progression	cases	%	View chart
Refer allocation cases with complete eligibility evidence	Land allocation — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Resolve conflicting state-land parcel records	Boundary reconciliation — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Reconcile assessed rents collections and outstanding balances	Lease revenue — Opening rent balance, charges and receipts	LKR	LKR	View chart
Prioritize overdue lease revenue cases	Arrears follow-up — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Refer non-compliance with recorded land-use conditions	Permit conditions — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Refer succession and transfer requests for determination	Succession cases — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Compare suitable state parcels for public facilities	Public-purpose land — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Resolve outstanding claims and objections before determination	Land disputes — Invitations, responses and unresolved concerns	participants	%	View chart
Review allocation requests overlapping protected reservations	Land reservations — Proposed footprint and constraint overlap	ha	%	View chart
Verify documentation for inter-agency land transfers	Institutional handover — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Refer suspected unauthorized occupation for investigation	Unauthorized occupation — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Request valuation updates where lease assessments are outdated	Valuation review — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Review whether allocated land serves approved purposes	Land-use effectiveness — Target and achieved value	ha	ha	View chart
Determine permitted release of land and applicant information	Record access — Access-permission review	requests	requests	View chart
Correct missing references in electronic land files	Document quality — Source documentation	evidence items	%	View chart
Allocate case-processing capacity across land offices	Office capacity — Required and usable capacity	service units	service units	View chart

HARTI · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Investigate large comparable farmgate wholesale and retail spreads	Price spreads — Comparable buying and selling quotations	LKR/kg	LKR/kg	View chart
Prioritize commodities with unusual price variability	Price volatility — Illustrative monthly price variation	LKR/kg	LKR/kg	View chart
Inform seasonal marketing using comparable historical patterns	Seasonal markets — Comparable wholesale price by observation period	LKR/kg	LKR/kg	View chart
Identify markets requiring closer price-distribution study	Market comparisons — Spread of comparable observations	records	records	View chart
Expand observations where price reporting is incomplete	Market coverage — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Compare documented food-basket costs across locations	Food affordability — Operating cost composition	LKR	LKR	View chart
Assess enterprise margins for policy research	Farmer returns — Enterprise gross margin	LKR	LKR	View chart
Identify value-chain stages requiring loss studies	Marketing losses — Batch input and saleable output	kg	%	View chart
Investigate persistent differences between connected markets	Market integration — Comparable buying and selling quotations	LKR/kg	LKR/kg	View chart
Evaluate agricultural policy outcomes with credible comparisons	Policy evaluation — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart
Investigate shifts in agricultural input expenditure	Input markets — Operating cost composition	LKR	LKR	View chart
Identify organizational barriers to collective marketing	Farmer organization research — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Review farm labour costs and labour-use differences	Land and labour — Area worked per labour input	ha/labour day	ha/labour day	View chart
Prioritize research on documented market supply shocks	Food supply disruptions — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Compare storage and handling options for perishables	Storage investments — Illustrative investment appraisal	LKR	LKR	View chart
Select agrarian research sampling strategies	Survey design — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Resolve contradictory market observations before release	Publication quality — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Target agrarian training to documented capability gaps	Training priorities — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Prioritize policy-analysis requests by decision deadlines	Research requests — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Independently reproduce agrarian research findings	Evidence reproducibility — Independent reproduction comparison	result units	result units	View chart

Export Development Board · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Prioritize products and destination markets for support	Export destinations — Composition of recorded observations	records	records	View chart
Identify excessive dependence on few export markets	Market dependence — Exposure by counterparty group	records	records	View chart
Target product groups contributing to export growth	Growth opportunities — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Investigate changing export unit values	Unit values — Export value per export quantity	LKR/kg	LKR/kg	View chart
Refer businesses to appropriate export-readiness support	Exporter readiness — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Identify unresolved market-entry requirements	Market access — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Compare proposed trade-promotion activities	Trade promotion — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Match verified exporter offers with buyer requirements	Buyer matching — Available supply and requested demand	kg	kg	View chart
Compare alternative products and markets under constraints	Export diversification — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Target support to regions with uncovered export potential	Exporter development — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Prioritize corrective support after shipment nonconformities	Quality failures — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Compare product branding and certification investments	Brand development — Illustrative investment appraisal	LKR	LKR	View chart
Evaluate realized outcomes of trade missions	Promotion outcomes — Service cohort progression	cases	%	View chart
Escalate unresolved exporter market-access cases	Trade barriers — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Target exporters needing digital market capability	Digital channels — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Review evidence supporting environmental product claims	Sustainable exports — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Compare export routes and delivery feasibility	Logistics constraints — Feasible route alternatives	minutes	minutes	View chart
Reconcile export-support commitments and verified delivery	Support funding — Approved budget, commitments and payments	LKR	LKR	View chart
Correct outdated or duplicate exporter profiles	Exporter directory — Source documentation	evidence items	%	View chart
Assess outcomes of export-development interventions	Export policy impact — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart

National Enterprise Development Authority · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Improve uptake of appropriate enterprise-support offers	Support uptake — Service cohort progression	cases	%	View chart
Follow trainees needing subsequent business assistance	Training progression — Service cohort progression	cases	%	View chart
Prioritize enterprise assistance cases waiting longest	Service delays — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Redirect outreach toward underserved target districts	Geographic reach — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Refer enterprise plans for financial and market appraisal	Business viability — Illustrative investment appraisal	LKR	LKR	View chart
Match enterprises to suitable finance-support pathways	Finance referral — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Allocate mentors to documented enterprise needs	Mentoring — Available supply and requested demand	kg	kg	View chart
Match enterprise products with verified buyer demand	Market linkages — Available supply and requested demand	kg	kg	View chart
Target follow-up to supported businesses at risk of closure	Enterprise survival — Establishment and survival	plants	%	View chart
Review changes in enterprise outcomes after assistance	Business performance — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart
Address gaps in access to enterprise opportunities	Women and youth support — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Refer complete enterprise-grant applications for determination	Grant administration — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Review potentially overlapping enterprise subsidies	Duplicate assistance — Recorded support and possible overlaps	cases	%	View chart
Prioritize training topics using verified capability gaps	Business skills — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Identify enterprises needing registration or compliance referrals	Formalization support — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Compare enterprise adaptation options	Climate resilience — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Allocate incubation services within facility and adviser limits	Incubation capacity — Required and usable capacity	service units	service units	View chart
Identify unfunded enterprise-support commitments	Programme finance — Approved budget, commitments and payments	LKR	LKR	View chart
Resolve inconsistent enterprise identities before reporting	Enterprise registry — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Select enterprise-support approaches for continuation or redesign	Programme effectiveness — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart

Industrial Development Board · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Match eligible industrial demand to available developed plots	Estate plots — Available supply and requested demand	kg	kg	View chart
Prioritize missing estate utilities and access infrastructure	Infrastructure readiness — Required and usable capacity	service units	service units	View chart
Verify enterprise outcomes following technical assistance	Support outcomes — Service cohort progression	cases	%	View chart
Resolve outstanding tenant-support requests	Estate requests — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Compare industrial modernization alternatives	Technology upgrades — Illustrative investment appraisal	LKR	LKR	View chart
Identify facilities with inefficient material and energy use	Resource productivity — Saleable output per process energy	kg/kWh	kg/kWh	View chart
Target technical support to recurring quality failures	Product quality — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Schedule technical training around verified skill needs	Industrial training — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Review proposed manufacturing projects against constraints	New enterprise appraisal — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Prioritize shared infrastructure maintenance	Estate maintenance — Asset defects awaiting maintenance	days	days	View chart
Follow up estate rent and lease-account discrepancies	Rent reconciliation — Opening rent balance, charges and receipts	LKR	LKR	View chart
Refer industrial environmental concerns to competent agencies	Pollution referrals — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Compare demand for shared industrial processing facilities	Common facilities — Required and usable capacity	service units	service units	View chart
Select feasible product-development support projects	Product development — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Reduce delays in technical testing and consultancy	Testing services — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Match industrial inputs by-products and buyer demand	Supply-chain linkages — Available supply and requested demand	kg	kg	View chart
Prioritize documented industrial safety concerns for specialist review	Worker safety — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Compare locations for new industrial-estate capacity	Estate expansion — Site-assessment evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Correct outdated plot and facility information	Estate catalogue — Source documentation	evidence items	%	View chart
Evaluate whether technical support improved enterprise performance	Industrial outcomes — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart

District Secretariats · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Escalate overdue district project milestones	District projects — Target and achieved value	days	days	View chart
Prioritize aging district service requests	Citizen services — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Coordinate investment in areas missing planned services	Intervention coverage — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Follow up missing or outdated divisional returns	District reporting — Scheduled and valid observations	observations	%	View chart
Compare district development priorities within resource limits	District planning — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Allocate district response resources against verified needs	Disaster coordination — Required and usable capacity	service units	service units	View chart
Identify district activities without confirmed financing	Funding coordination — Approved budget, commitments and payments	LKR	LKR	View chart
Resolve cross-agency land issues delaying public works	Land coordination — Invitations, responses and unresolved concerns	participants	%	View chart
Compare service access across district communities	Infrastructure access — Feasible route alternatives	minutes	minutes	View chart
Review overlapping assistance across district programmes	Beneficiary overlap — Recorded support and possible overlaps	cases	%	View chart
Escalate unresolved safeguards in district investments	Safeguard follow-up — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Target administrative support to overloaded divisions	Divisional capacity — Required and usable capacity	service units	service units	View chart
Resolve inter-agency grievances with clear ownership	District grievances — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Ensure affected groups are heard in district plans	Public consultation — Invitations, responses and unresolved concerns	participants	%	View chart
Address documented exclusion from district services	Programme inclusion — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Schedule district procurements affecting critical works	Procurement dependencies — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Verify ownership and maintenance of completed public assets	Asset handover — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Assess district programme outcomes with stated limitations	Outcome reporting — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart
Resolve district reporting boundary and code mismatches	Geographic consistency — Vocabulary mapping coverage	source concepts	source concepts	View chart
Close district coordination cases with unmet dependencies	Inter-agency decisions — Invitations, responses and unresolved concerns	participants	%	View chart

Divisional Secretariats · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Clear applications awaiting divisional administrative action	Administrative applications — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Address divisional services exceeding approved response targets	Service standards — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Target reported local programme-support gaps	Programme gaps — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Follow up incomplete village-level reports	Grama Niladhari returns — Scheduled and valid observations	observations	%	View chart
Prepare complete land cases for the competent authority	State-land referrals — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Prioritize verified local relief needs and avoid duplicate claims	Disaster relief — Recorded support and possible overlaps	cases	%	View chart
Route complete welfare cases to the responsible programme	Social-service referrals — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Identify document-verification gaps delaying certificates	Certificate services — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Compare village-development proposals	Local development — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Resolve local objections before administrative determination	Community consultation — Invitations, responses and unresolved concerns	participants	%	View chart
Schedule required inspections efficiently	Field inspections — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Reconcile approved assistance with disbursement evidence	Financial assistance — Approved budget, commitments and payments	LKR	LKR	View chart
Identify underserved villages and eligible groups	Service inclusion — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Assign unresolved local complaints to accountable offices	Citizen complaints — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Verify local works against approved scope	Project monitoring — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Prioritize maintenance referrals for local public assets	Public assets — Asset defects awaiting maintenance	days	days	View chart
Resolve contradictory household and land records	Data reconciliation — Source and verification comparison	households	households	View chart
Allocate staff to service desks with capacity shortages	Office workload — Required and usable capacity	service units	service units	View chart
Correct missing context in divisional statistical returns	Local reporting — Source documentation	evidence items	%	View chart
Track cases through responsible institutions to documented outcomes	Referral completion — Service cohort progression	cases	%	View chart

Grama Niladhari Officers · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Submit overdue required village reports	Field reporting — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Identify households needing consented follow-up or referral	Community observations — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Resolve incomplete or inconsistent village case reports	Case corrections — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Verify missing or uncertain locations of community assets	Asset locations — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Prioritize rapid verification of local disaster impacts	Disaster impacts — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Prepare evidence for authorized relief decisions	Relief referrals — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Flag possible repeated assistance for divisional review	Duplicate assistance — Recorded support and possible overlaps	cases	%	View chart
Schedule verification of reported household changes	Household updates — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Check required evidence before referring certificate requests	Certificate evidence — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Refer unmet needs through approved support channels	Vulnerable residents — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Escalate unresolved local complaints within jurisdiction	Community complaints — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Identify residents missing authorized emergency messages	Public warnings — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Ensure relevant residents can participate in consultations	Community meetings — Invitations, responses and unresolved concerns	participants	%	View chart
Refer damaged public assets to responsible maintainers	Local infrastructure — Asset defects awaiting maintenance	days	days	View chart
Report land-use concerns without making ownership determinations	Land observations — Proposed footprint and constraint overlap	ha	%	View chart
Plan feasible household and site follow-up routes	Field visits — Feasible route alternatives	minutes	minutes	View chart
Track referrals to verified service outcomes	Programme follow-up — Service cohort progression	cases	%	View chart
Check permitted use before sharing household information	Record privacy — Access-permission review	requests	requests	View chart
Correct local records assigned to inconsistent geographic codes	Boundary codes — Vocabulary mapping coverage	source concepts	source concepts	View chart
Identify recurring local service problems from feedback	Service feedback — Composition of recorded observations	records	records	View chart

Farmer Organizations · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Coordinate support for underused member farmland	Land use — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Review potentially overlapping assistance to members	Support fairness — Recorded support and possible overlaps	cases	%	View chart
Prepare evidence-based seasonal water requests	Crop water need and effective rainfall by crop stage	mm/stage	m³/stage	View chart
Escalate overdue collective farming requests	Service coordination — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Propose workable water rotations for member areas	Water rotations — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Investigate unequal delivery against agreed allocations	Tail-end equity — Target and achieved value	ha	ha	View chart
Plan joint input purchases against verified member demand	Collective inputs — Available stock and delivery commitments	stock units	stock units	View chart
Match aggregated produce with verified buyer requirements	Collective marketing — Available supply and requested demand	kg	kg	View chart
Allocate shared machinery without conflicting reservations	Machinery sharing — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Prioritize common tank and canal maintenance requests	Irrigation upkeep — Asset defects awaiting maintenance	days	days	View chart
Reconcile organization receipts expenses and balances	Group finance — Opening cash, receipts and payments	LKR	LKR	View chart
Resolve inconsistent or duplicate member records	Membership — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Address missing meetings audits and required disclosures	Governance — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Target member training to verified skill gaps	Training — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Compare collective responses to forecast water shortages	Drought plans — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Coordinate verification of shared crop-damage reports	Crop-loss evidence — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Compare collective storage and handling investments	Storage — Illustrative investment appraisal	LKR	LKR	View chart
Resolve member objections to collective plans	Participation — Invitations, responses and unresolved concerns	participants	%	View chart
Follow up members missing agreed information updates	Member communication — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Evaluate benefits and costs of group farming services	Collective outcomes — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart

Farmers · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Choose crops using transparent enterprise gross margins	Farm profitability — Enterprise gross margin	LKR	LKR	View chart
Plan irrigation needs for the proposed crop season	Paddy water need and effective rainfall by crop stage	mm/stage	m³/stage	View chart
Identify handling stages causing verified crop losses	Harvest losses — Batch input and saleable output	kg	%	View chart
Adjust planned planting against crop calendar and advice	Planting dates — Target and achieved value	days	days	View chart
Compare suitable crop and variety alternatives	Crop choice — Site-assessment evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Plan affordable crop inputs with actual cost assumptions	Input budgeting — Operating cost composition	LKR	LKR	View chart
Identify seasonal cash shortages before commitments	Cash needs — Opening cash, receipts and payments	LKR	LKR	View chart
Seek reviewed nutrient advice using valid soil tests	Soil advice — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Decide when to request specialist pest or disease diagnosis	Pest diagnosis — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Check proposed treatments against current authorized guidance	Safe crop protection — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Select seed lots with verified suitability and quality evidence	Seed purchase — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Schedule available labour around critical crop operations	Labour planning — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Compare hiring and ownership of farm machinery	Machinery choice — Illustrative investment appraisal	LKR	LKR	View chart
Compare buyer offers after costs and quality differences	Selling decisions — Comparable buying and selling quotations	LKR/kg	LKR/kg	View chart
Identify feasible buyers for available produce	Buyer matching — Available supply and requested demand	kg	kg	View chart
Compare feasible water-saving and crop-adaptation options	Drought adaptation — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Compare immediate sale with safe storage alternatives	Storage decisions — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Appraise proposed farm improvements under realistic scenarios	Farm investment — Illustrative investment appraisal	LKR	LKR	View chart
Prepare complete evidence for relevant farmer-support schemes	Support applications — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Identify missing records needed for reliable farm analysis	Farm recordkeeping — Source documentation	evidence items	%	View chart

Plantation Companies · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Target estate crop and seasonal cost drivers	Production economics — Operating cost composition	LKR	LKR	View chart
Evaluate soil and water-management practice outcomes	Soil and water — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart
Prioritize blocks for replanting or rehabilitation	Replanting areas — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Address gaps in verified worker-support coverage	Worker services — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Compare crops and cultivars for estate conditions	Crop suitability — Site-assessment evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Target maintenance to weak new-planting cohorts	Planting survival — Establishment and survival	plants	%	View chart
Prioritize conservation treatment in vulnerable estate blocks	Erosion control — Illustrative sheet and rill soil loss	t/ha/year	t/ha/year	View chart
Plan harvesting around maturity weather and capacity	Harvest scheduling — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Refer unusual plantation pest and disease patterns	Pest management — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Investigate poor conversion of harvest to saleable product	Processing efficiency — Saleable output per batch input	%	%	View chart
Target resource-efficiency improvements in estate operations	Energy and water — Product output per process energy	kg/kWh	kg/kWh	View chart
Investigate product lots failing applicable specifications	Product quality — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Compare estate adaptation investments	Climate resilience — Illustrative investment appraisal	LKR	LKR	View chart
Prioritize documented occupational hazards for competent review	Worker safety — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Identify estate communities with service deficits	Water and housing — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Schedule critical estate and factory equipment maintenance	Maintenance — Asset defects awaiting maintenance	days	days	View chart
Resolve breaks in estate product provenance	Traceability — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Review estate carbon-stock estimates and pool coverage	Carbon evidence — Comparable carbon-stock scenario	t C/ha	t C	View chart
Resolve concerns around estate development proposals	Community consultation — Invitations, responses and unresolved concerns	participants	%	View chart
Reconcile inconsistent block crop and land-use records	Estate classifications — Vocabulary mapping coverage	source concepts	source concepts	View chart

Plantation Workers/Community Groups · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Identify worker groups missing agreed services	Training and services — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Escalate unresolved worker and community issues	Issue follow-up — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Review overlapping assistance without exposing private identities	Programme overlap — Recorded support and possible overlaps	cases	%	View chart
Identify programmes lacking baseline and follow-up evidence	Verified outcomes — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart
Refer documented water-quality concerns to qualified services	Drinking water — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Prioritize community sanitation improvements	Sanitation — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Refer unsafe housing observations for qualified assessment	Housing safety — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Address gaps in access to appropriate childcare services	Childcare access — Required and usable capacity	service units	service units	View chart
Follow up access to qualified health services	Health referrals — Service cohort progression	cases	%	View chart
Select training topics aligned with livelihood needs	Skills development — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Compare feasible supplementary livelihood options	Livelihood alternatives — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Refer documented occupational safety concerns	Workplace concerns — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Compare travel barriers to essential community services	Service accessibility — Feasible route alternatives	minutes	minutes	View chart
Identify residents missing agreed preparedness arrangements	Disaster preparedness — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Ensure affected workers can respond to development proposals	Participation — Invitations, responses and unresolved concerns	participants	%	View chart
Prioritize repair referrals for shared facilities	Community facilities — Asset defects awaiting maintenance	days	days	View chart
Prepare evidence for authorized community-support decisions	Support eligibility — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Reconcile approved group contributions and expenditure	Community funds — Opening cash, receipts and payments	LKR	LKR	View chart
Improve delivery of agreed community information	Communication — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Determine safe sharing of sensitive community case information	Privacy and safeguarding — Access-permission review	requests	requests	View chart

Buyers and Traders · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Match available produce with compatible dated buyer demand	Supply matching — Available supply and requested demand	kg	kg	View chart
Compare procurement offers for equivalent product grades	Procurement prices — Comparable buying and selling quotations	LKR/kg	LKR/kg	View chart
Investigate wholesale and retail spreads after costs	Trading spreads — Comparable buying and selling quotations	LKR/kg	LKR/kg	View chart
Prioritize time-sensitive buyer orders	Delivery commitments — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Review supplier delivery performance using accepted records	Supplier reliability — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Refer received lots failing agreed quality specifications	Product acceptance — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Plan replenishment without overcommitting perishable stock	Stock management — Available stock and delivery commitments	stock units	stock units	View chart
Identify handling and storage stages with verified losses	Spoilage reduction — Batch input and saleable output	kg	%	View chart
Compare feasible collection and delivery routes	Transport planning — Feasible route alternatives	minutes	minutes	View chart
Compare storage with immediate sale under price uncertainty	Storage choice — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Identify cash gaps from buying and selling schedules	Trading cash flow — Opening cash, receipts and payments	LKR	LKR	View chart
Follow up overdue customer payments within agreed terms	Buyer payments — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Review exposure to a small number of buyers	Customer dependence — Exposure by counterparty group	records	records	View chart
Compare sourcing alternatives where supply is concentrated	Supplier dependence — Exposure by counterparty group	records	records	View chart
Adjust procurement exposure after reviewing price volatility	Price variability — Illustrative monthly price variation	LKR/kg	LKR/kg	View chart
Resolve missing provenance for traded lots	Traceability — Source and verification comparison	m³	m³	View chart
Compare candidate markets against logistics and demand	Market expansion — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Check evidence before entering supply agreements	Contract readiness — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Compare packaging options for losses cost and buyer needs	Packaging choices — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Correct inconsistent product grades and quantity units	Product catalogue — Vocabulary mapping coverage	source concepts	source concepts	View chart

Processors and Exporters · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Improve conversion of inputs into saleable output	Processing yield — Saleable output per batch input	%	%	View chart
Investigate high shipment cost per tonne-kilometre	Logistics costs — Operating cost composition	LKR	LKR	View chart
Investigate shipments outside approved temperature conditions	Cold chain — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Review export unit values and destination performance	Export performance — Export value per export quantity	LKR/kg	LKR/kg	View chart
Match processing demand to compatible supplier lots	Raw materials — Available supply and requested demand	kg	kg	View chart
Compare orders with usable processing capacity	Capacity planning — Required and usable capacity	service units	service units	View chart
Schedule batches around quality and delivery constraints	Production scheduling — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Prioritize product nonconformities for technical investigation	Quality assurance — Quality checks and unresolved exceptions	checks	%	View chart
Identify affected lots when a source defect is confirmed	Traceability and recall — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Select loss-reduction actions at processing bottlenecks	Food loss — Batch input and saleable output	kg	%	View chart
Target processes with high energy per saleable unit	Energy efficiency — Saleable output per process energy	kg/kWh	kg/kWh	View chart
Compare process water use and reuse alternatives	Water efficiency — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Prioritize critical equipment repairs and preventive work	Equipment reliability — Asset defects awaiting maintenance	days	days	View chart
Avoid using expired or quarantined materials	Inventory expiry — Available stock and delivery commitments	stock units	stock units	View chart
Check packaging against destination and buyer requirements	Packaging compliance — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Identify cash shortfalls across purchase production and payment cycles	Working capital — Opening cash, receipts and payments	LKR	LKR	View chart
Compare equipment and facility expansion investments	Expansion appraisal — Illustrative investment appraisal	LKR	LKR	View chart
Refer complete shipment documentation for required clearance	Export documentation — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Target technical training to process-quality and safety gaps	Workforce capability — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Correct missing units versions and batch references	Process records — Source documentation	evidence items	%	View chart

Banks and Finance Institutions · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Select investments for detailed cash-flow appraisal	Investment appraisal — Illustrative investment appraisal	LKR	LKR	View chart
Assess debt-service coverage under lender-defined scenarios	Repayment capacity — Debt-service coverage under the scenario	ratio	ratio	View chart
Identify gaps between required finance and confirmed commitments	Co-financing — Approved budget, commitments and payments	LKR	LKR	View chart
Compare investment viability under reviewed stress assumptions	Sensitivity — Illustrative investment appraisal	LKR	LKR	View chart
Refer climate-exposed financing cases for specialist assessment	Climate risk — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Evaluate documented environmental and social controls	Environmental and social risk — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Refer proposed green-finance classifications for verification	Green taxonomy — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Identify missing or contradictory borrower evidence	Credit evidence — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Compare repayment schedules with agricultural cash generation	Seasonal lending — Debt-service coverage under the scenario	ratio	ratio	View chart
Review sector geography and counterparty exposure concentration	Portfolio concentration — Exposure by counterparty group	records	records	View chart
Prioritize overdue cases for authorized engagement	Arrears management — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Refer collateral evidence gaps to qualified valuers and legal teams	Collateral review — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Verify prerequisites before authorized disbursement decisions	Disbursement conditions — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Review evidence supporting financed environmental and social outcomes	Impact claims — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart
Resolve financing applications stalled at required review stages	Application processing — Service cohort progression	cases	%	View chart
Refer guarantee requests against approved scheme criteria	Guarantee programmes — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Identify gaps in access to appropriate financing services	Financial inclusion — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Compare expected funding inflows with committed disbursements	Liquidity planning — Opening cash, receipts and payments	LKR	LKR	View chart
Compare financing alternatives for resilient farm and enterprise investments	Adaptation finance — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Determine permitted use and sharing of client data	Financial privacy — Access-permission review	requests	requests	View chart

PES Intermediaries · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Prioritize PES obligations due for independent verification	Verification schedule — Planned and actual task duration	days	days	View chart
Review claims for physically verified environmental services	Service delivery — Illustrative environmental-service payment proposal	LKR	LKR	View chart
Reconcile physical ecosystem services with separate monetary accounts	Service accounting — Physical ecosystem-service account	physical service units	physical service units	View chart
Compare verification cost per accepted service unit	Verification cost — Operating cost composition	LKR	LKR	View chart
Identify missing authority and governance before a PES pilot	Scheme readiness — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Refer participant applications against approved scheme criteria	Provider eligibility — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Assess whether proposed services exceed a credible baseline	Additionality — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart
Investigate displaced environmental impacts outside agreement areas	Leakage — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart
Review reversal risks and approved response arrangements	Permanence — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Compare feasible service agreements and provider obligations	Contract design — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Prepare payment proposals only from approved verified conditions	Payment proposals — Illustrative environmental-service payment proposal	LKR	LKR	View chart
Resolve disputes about agreed benefit-sharing arrangements	Benefit sharing — Invitations, responses and unresolved concerns	participants	%	View chart
Investigate overlapping environmental-service claims	Double counting — Recorded support and possible overlaps	cases	%	View chart
Select credible monitoring indicators and protocols	Monitoring design — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Identify gaps in finance for long-term service obligations	Funding sustainability — Approved budget, commitments and payments	LKR	LKR	View chart
Review food-security tenure and livelihood risks	Provider safeguards — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Escalate unresolved PES grievances through approved procedures	Grievances and appeals — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Check conflicts and independence of service verification	Independent review — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Compare renewal redesign and closure of PES agreements	Renewal decisions — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Resolve inconsistent service units and agreement references	Scheme records — Vocabulary mapping coverage	source concepts	source concepts	View chart

Universities and Researchers · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Select datasets suitable for spatial and temporal comparison	Dataset selection — Source documentation	evidence items	%	View chart
Compare validated soil and forest outcomes across interventions	Intervention research — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart
Identify biodiversity comparisons limited by survey design	Sampling limitations — Observed richness and survey effort	observed species	observed species	View chart
Prioritize scientific estimates awaiting independent assessment	Expert review — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Select questions aligned with institutional evidence gaps	Research questions — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Check research approvals before collecting restricted evidence	Ethics and permissions — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Compare designs for adequate precision and representation	Sampling design — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Require independent evidence before applying predictive models	Model validation — Independent reproduction comparison	result units	result units	View chart
Resolve contradictory measurements without altering originals	Data cleaning — Comparable recorded counts	records	records	View chart
Reproduce reported results from exact evidence versions	Reproducibility — Independent reproduction comparison	result units	result units	View chart
Match institutional research needs with qualified expertise	Research collaboration — Available supply and requested demand	kg	kg	View chart
Determine whether evidence supports causal claims	Causal interpretation — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart
Choose additional measurements that reduce material uncertainty	Uncertainty priorities — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Compare study proposals under budget and evidence constraints	Research funding — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Review consent rights and sensitivity before releasing data	Data publication — Access-permission review	requests	requests	View chart
Prevent loss of critical follow-up observations	Longitudinal studies — Establishment and survival	plants	%	View chart
Verify analytical controls supporting research measurements	Laboratory quality — Inspection evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Prepare evidence packages for specific institutional decisions	Knowledge transfer — Invitations, responses and unresolved concerns	participants	%	View chart
Evaluate use and effects of research outputs	Research outcomes — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart
Resolve inconsistent scientific variables and taxonomic labels	Scientific vocabulary — Vocabulary mapping coverage	source concepts	source concepts	View chart

Community-Based Organizations and NGOs · 20 decisions

Decision	Chart quantity	Plot unit	Result unit	Open
Target communities missing intended livelihood support	Livelihood reach — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Prioritize unresolved feedback and complaints	Community feedback — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Verify practical outcomes after community training	Training follow-up — Service cohort progression	cases	%	View chart
Escalate locations with prolonged community-service delays	Service delays — Pending cases and time waiting	days	days	View chart
Compare community priorities using inclusive evidence	Needs assessment — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Resolve barriers to meaningful community participation	Participation — Invitations, responses and unresolved concerns	participants	%	View chart
Prepare complete evidence for authorized programme selection	Beneficiary selection — Application evidence	evidence items	%	View chart
Coordinate complementary assistance and review potential duplication	Support overlap — Recorded support and possible overlaps	cases	%	View chart
Route sensitive concerns through authorized confidential channels	Safeguarding referrals — Access-permission review	requests	requests	View chart
Compare community-led adaptation alternatives	Climate adaptation — Cost of feasible planning alternatives	LKR	LKR	View chart
Prioritize repairs to shared livelihood and water assets	Community assets — Asset defects awaiting maintenance	days	days	View chart
Match volunteer capacity to approved community tasks	Volunteer deployment — Available supply and requested demand	kg	kg	View chart
Reconcile community grants and verified expenditure	Programme finance — Opening cash, receipts and payments	LKR	LKR	View chart
Identify feasible market links for community enterprises	Market access — Available supply and requested demand	kg	kg	View chart
Target communities lacking reliable safe service access	Water and sanitation — Service coverage and unmet need	eligible units	%	View chart
Address gaps in local warning and evacuation arrangements	Disaster preparedness — Hazard exposure and control evidence	controls	controls	View chart
Follow up participants lost from continuing support programmes	Programme retention — Establishment and survival	plants	%	View chart
Evaluate whether programmes produced sustained community benefits	Outcome evaluation — Treatment and comparison outcome change	percentage points	percentage points	View chart
Resolve unclear ownership of cross-organization actions	Partner coordination — Invitations, responses and unresolved concerns	participants	%	View chart
Improve completeness of consented community monitoring records	Community evidence — Source documentation	evidence items	%	View chart

Existing operational records and source assets are unchanged. No database deployment is part of this review update.